Actually I retract last comment - the patch on SOLR-2066 looks like it could
work after all...it gets further but then dies in the
HighlightComponent..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-rant-about-field-collapsing-tp3222798p3229194.html
Sent from the Solr
is message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-rant-about-field-collapsing-tp3222798p3228835.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is because it is trying to use the "response". Very similar
to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2270
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-rant-about-field-collapsing-tp3222798p3228753.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
no check at present for "grouped" in the NamedList,
> so the solrj client gets no results back when searching with grouping
> parameters. I assume I can add this on my local working copy and all will
> be
> well?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://luce
n my local working copy and all will be
well?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/A-rant-about-field-collapsing-tp3222798p3225361.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hancement but as SOLR-236
> had been 3-4 years in progress and SOLR-2524 did not exist at the time it
> seemed pretty safe to assume that the same problem was not being fixed in 2
> totally different ways!
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
.nabble.com/A-rant-about-field-collapsing-tp3222798p3222798.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
