regards,
> Shrikanth
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 3:48 PM, user 01 wrote:
>
> > Can some expert users please leave a comment on this ?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, user 01 wrote:
> >
> > > Using a single node Solr instance,
Can some expert users please leave a comment on this ?
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 2:54 AM, user 01 wrote:
> Using a single node Solr instance, I need to search for, lets say,
> electronics items & grocery items. But I never want to search both of them
> together. When I search for
7;t be able to now
make use of the fixed sort order?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013, at 11:09 PM, user 01 wrote:
> > Any way to store documents in a fixed sort order within the indexes of
> > certain fields(either the arrival ord
Any way to store documents in a fixed sort order within the indexes of
certain fields(either the arrival order or sorted by int ids, that also
serve as my unique key), so that I could store them optimized for browsing
lists of items ?
The order for browsing is always fixed & there are no further f
onfig.xml. Is there any way to iterate over
all categories & warm up the query for each ?
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> If you are asking to read from a file for warm up and if there is not a
> capability for what you want I can open a Jira issue and send a patch.
what's the way to warm up filter queries for a category field with 1000
possible values. Would I need to write 1000 lines manually in the
solrconig.xml or what is the format?
@Gora:
you understood the schema correctly, but I can't believe it's strange but i
think it is actually the recommended way.. you index your data but don't
store in a Search engine, you store your actual data in DB, which is the
right place for it. Data in SE should be just used for indexing. Isn't
Using a single node Solr instance, I need to search for, lets say,
electronics items & grocery items. But I never want to search both of them
together. When I search for electrnoics I don't expect a grocery item ever
& vice versa.
Should I be defining both these document types within a single sche
For geospatial search, I need to filter out all points outside of certain
radius from a certain point. No need for precise results, Approximation
will work for me! No sorting is required either. I see there are two
Spatial impls: LatLonType & SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType. But I am
sure which
I need to sort documents returned in order of (descending)score &
(descending)value of an int field within the document. How do I ensure
proper sort order as well as good performance ?
I don't need the sort-order defined by sort=score desc,intField desc. The
sort order needs to be somewhat like wh
10 matches
Mail list logo
