roperty. This is not
> > useful if two collection required two separate set of credentials and they
> > are parallelly accessed.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Thanks Marcus for your response.
Best,
Mark
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 4:50 PM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> I would stick to the query elevation component, it is pretty fast and
> easier to handle/configure elevation IDs, instead of using function queries
> for it. We have customers that set a
Thanks for the reply Markus!
I did try it.
My question specifically was (repasting here):-
Which is more recommended/ performant?
Note:- Assume that I have hundreds of ids to boost like this.
Is there a difference to the answer if docs to be boosted after the sort is
less?
Thanks!
Mark
On Wed
rt is
less?
Could someone please share your thoughts/experience?
Thanks!
Mark.
uating the words with each other,
word1 and word2, word1 and word3, word2 and word3, rather than phrase1 and
phrase2.
Are stop words removed when querying, I assume yes. ?
Thanks in advance
Mark
the words with each other.
Are stop words removed when querying, I assume yes. ?
Thanks in advance
Mark
e asking for
> help - likely they are in set it and forget it mode.
Oh, there are quite a few instances of Solr 4 out there as well. Many
of them will be moving to v7 or v8, probably starting in the next 6-12
months.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana Universi
Thanks!
Mark
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:56 AM Dave wrote:
> Agreed. Just a JavaScript check on the input box would work fine for 99%
> of cases, unless something automatic is running them in which case just
> server side redirect back to the form.
>
> > On Oct 27, 2020,
Hi Konstantinos ,
Thanks for the reply.
I too feel the same. Wanted to find what others also in the Solr world
thought about it.
Thanks!
Mark.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Konstantinos Koukouvis <
konstantinos.koukou...@mecenat.com> wrote:
> Oh hi Mark!
>
> Why would you
ipate is a
query like "1 inch screw" can have the important information "1" stripped
out if I tokenize it.
So what would be a good way to avoid single digit only and single letter
only queries, from the Solr end?
Or should I not do this at the Solr end at all?
Could someone please share your thoughts?
Thanks!
Mark
creating the elevateIds, thinking I can gain performance or they
remaining in the elevateIds does not cause any performance difference?
Thanks!
Mark
Hey, I'm new to configuring Solr. I'm trying to configure Solr with Rule Based
Authorization.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/rule-based-authorization-plugin.html
I have permissions working if I allow everything with "all", but I want to
limit access so that a site can only access its
k tells Solr where in the overall document
sequence to start working.
So yes, there *is* a better way.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
core.
You should find out what user account is used by the service script,
and 'chown' Solr's entire working directories tree to be owned by that
user. Then, refrain from ever running Solr as 'root' or the problem
may recur. Use the normal service start/stop mechanism fo
Thanks Colvin!
All the responses were helpful.
Best
Mark
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:06 AM Colvin Cowie
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> If queries taking 10 (or however many) seconds isn't acceptable, then
> either you need to a) prevent or optimize those queries, b) improve the
>
Thanks much Bram!
Best,
Mark
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:59 AM Bram Van Dam wrote:
> There are a couple of open issues related to the timeAllowed parameter.
> For instance it currently doesn't work on conjunction with the
> cursorMark parameter [1]. And on Solr 7 it doesn
Thanks Dominique!
So is this parameter generally recommended or not. I wanted to try with a
value of 10s. We are not using it now.
My goal is to prevent a query from running more than 10s on the solr server
and choking it.
What is the general recommendation.
Thanks!
Mark
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at
you think the above
scenario of valid count displayed in numFound, but doc list empty can ever
occur still, as there is more time before cut-off to retrieve at least one
doc ?
Thanks!
Mark
Makes sense.
Thanks much David!
Mark
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 12:13 AM David Smiley wrote:
> The general assumption in deploying a search platform is that you are going
> to front it with a service you write that has the search features you care
> about, and only those. Only this s
solrconfig, schema etc..)
Thanks!
Mark
h encryption.");
}
Rather than checking for an empty system property (which would indicate SLL is
off) its checking for a populated one which is what you get when SSL is on.
Should I raise this as a Jira bug?
Mark ToddUnless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Reg
ust not worth the gain.
So, my wish-list for Solr includes either (a) abolish standalone so
the decision is taken out of my hands, or (b) port some of the
cloud-only APIs back to the standalone layer. I haven't spent a
moment's thought on how difficult either would be -- as I said, jus
. I could see calling it a "herd" or
suchlike.
Now I'll try to shut up again. :-)
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
of mastery.)
But this is an emotional issue, not a logical one. If doing X makes
people angry, and we don't want to make those people angry, then
perhaps we should not do X.
> i think it is better to use the metaphor of copying rather than one of
> hierarchy. language has so many (un
Primary / satellite?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oot cause,
> so the next best thing might be to check every 15 minutes or so if it's
> running and run it if it has stopped.
I've used Monit for things that must be kept running:
https://mmonit.com/monit/
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana Universi
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 02:47:57PM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/14/2020 1:13 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:11:40AM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >> On 4/16/2020 10:07 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> >>> I need to ask Solr 4.10 for the nam
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 03:13:07PM -0400, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Anyway, I'll be reading up on how to upgrade to 5. (Hopefully not
> farther, just yet -- changes between, I think, 5 and 6 mean I'd have
> to spend a week reloading 10 years worth of data. For now I don't
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:11:40AM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/16/2020 10:07 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> > I need to ask Solr 4.10 for the name of the unique key field of a
> > schema. So far, no matter what I've done, Solr is returning a 404.
> >
> > Thi
e
scrolling is *very* insensitive -- takes a lot of wheel motion to move
the panel just a bit.
(I'm aware that a lot of the things I complain about in "modern" web
sites are the things that make them "modern". So, I'm an old fossil. :-)
Firefox 68.7.0esr, Gento
; https://toolshed.wood.net:8443/solr/isw6_3/schema/uniquekey
>
> If that’s not the case you need to mention your collection. But in
> either case your collection name comes after /solr/.
Thank you. I think that's what I have now.
> > On Apr 16, 2020, at 12:07 PM, Mark H. Wood
w6_3/solr/statistics/schema/uniquekey'
So does this:
curl 'https://toolshed.wood.net:8443/isw6_3/solr/statistics/schema'
We normally use the ClassicIndexSchemaFactory. I tried switching to
ManagedIndexSchemaFactory but it made no difference. Nothing is
logged for the failed
aging-and-deep-paging/
Thank you for the links. I think these will be very helpful.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t on a full-sized copy of the live data has been
running for an hour and is still going, is it totally impractical
to expect that I can improve the process enough to give a response
to an ad-hoc query while-you-wait?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana
s only
divide the universe between those who can do nothing to your Solr and
those who can do *everything* to your Solr.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
you want to be rid of this dependency altogether, but at least
it may allow the spring-boot artifact to run, until the other problem
is sorted.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
olr-core is not the only artifact with that
dependency. The first thing I would do is examine the output of 'mvn
dependency:tree' to see what has dragged log4j-slf4j-impl in even when
it is excluded from solr-core.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana Uni
ntain the product, so I'm always creating and
destroying instances.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lot.
But seriously, you have a second chance here.
This mostly concerns SolrCloud. That’s why I recommend standalone mode. But
key people know why to do. I know it will happen - but their lives will be
easier if you help.
Lol.
- Mark
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 9:25 PM Mark Miller wrote:
>
you
don’t need too.
Mark
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 7:05 PM Dave wrote:
> I’m young here I think, not even 40 and only been using solr since like
> 2008 or so, so like 1.4 give or take. But I know a really good therapist if
> you want to talk about it.
>
> > On Nov 30, 2019, at 6:
college i would talk about past Mark screwing future Mark and too bad
for him. What did he ever do for me? Well, he got me again ;)
I’m out of steam, time and wife patentice.
Enough key people are aware of the scope of the problem now that you won’t
need me. I was never actually part of the
more than tangentially.
Mark
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
has ensured the end of the hobbyist. I hope that
changes too.”
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
Yes. That is our biggest advantage. Being Apache. Almost no one seems to be
employed to help other contributors get their work in at the right level,
and all the money has ensured the end of the hobbyist. I hope that changes
too.
Thanks for the note.
Mark
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:55 PM Paras
The people I have identified that I have the most faith in to lead the
fixing of Solr are Ishan, Noble and David. I encourage you all to look at
and follow and join in their leadership.
You can do this.
Mark
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
getting to fix things.
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
y I found nothing in solr cloud worth changing from standalone
> for, and just added more complications, more servers, and required becoming
> an expert/knowledgeable in zoo keeper, id rather spend my time developing
> than becoming a systems administrator
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 3
This is your queue to come and make your jokes with your name attached. I’m
sure the Solr users will appreciate them more than I do. I can’t laugh at
this situation because I take production code seriously.
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
And if you are a developer, enjoy that Gradle build! It was the highlight
of my year.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:00 AM Mark Miller wrote:
> If you have a SolrCloud installation that is somehow working for you,
> personally I would never upgrade. The software is getting progressively
to work on it in any real fashion since 2012. I’m
sorry I couldn’t help improve the situation for you.
Take it for what it’s worth. To some, not much I’m sure.
Mark Miller
--
- Mark
http://about.me/markrmiller
018/11/20/apache-solr-hadoop-authentication-plugin-ldap.html
ADS also uses Kerberos, and Solr has a Kerberos authN plugin. Would
that help?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indiana
re needed. The best one can usually do is to reduce the
frequency at which some credential must be entered manually.
Solr supplies several authentication mechanisms besides BasicAuth.
Would one of those serve?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue U
n error,
> please do not read, print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use
> the information. Please delete this email and attachments, without reading,
> printing, copying, forwarding or saving them, and notify the Sender
> immediately by reply email. No confidentiality
Hello Michael,
Thank you for pointing that out.
Today I am planning to try this out along with the insights Shawn had
shared.
Thanks!
Mark.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:21 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Another thing to check is that I believe the configuration you posted
Hello Shawn,
Thank you so much for the detailed response.
It was so helpful!
Thanks!
Mark.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:40 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/16/2019 3:51 AM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> > I am trying to understand the socket time out and connection time out i
then increase the values to maybe 1000 ms and
1500 ms respectively
and see lesser time out error messages?
I am trying to understand how these parameters can be put to good use.
Thanks!
Mark
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 03:45:21PM -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/9/2019 3:07 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> > Did I miss something, or is there no way, using SolrJ, to enumerate
> > loaded cores, as:
> >
> >curl 'http://solr.example.com:8983/solr/admin/co
Thank you Jan for the reply.
I will try it out.
Best,
Mark.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:29 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I have never used such settings, but you could check out
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/common-query-parameters.html#segmentterminateearly-parameter
> which w
it returns only
partial results.
That is how I came across the "timeAllowed" and wanted to check on it.
Also was curious to know whether "shardHandler" could be used to work in
those lines or it is meant for a totally different functionality.
Thanks!
Best,
Mark
On Sun, Aug
curious to know different ways if any n SOLR to restrict/ limit a time
consuming query from processing for a long time.
Thanks!
Mark
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 2:15 PM Mark Robinson
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have the following questions please:-
>
> In solrconfig.xml I created a new "/se
Did I miss something, or is there no way, using SolrJ, to enumerate
loaded cores, as:
curl 'http://solr.example.com:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=STATUS'
does?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W
that shardHandler has nothing
to restrict a query once fired against Solr?
Could someone pls share your views?
Thanks!
Mark
, "node":"#ANY"}]
If I set my cluster-policy rules back to [] and try to restore it then
successfully restores my collection exactly how I expect it to be. It
appears that having any cluster-policy rules in place is affecting my
restore, but the "error getting replica locations" is strange.
Any suggestions?
mark
s. I can't seem to get it
to add the replica to the shard that is left with the single replica.
Any suggestions on a policy to keep this balanced?
Mark
My thought is that “greater than” and “less than” are generally undefined for
n-dimensional points where n>1.
Is (45,45) > (-45,-45)? If you’re talking about distance from (0,0) they’re
“equal”. If you’re talking about distance from some arbitrary point then they
are not necessarily “equal”; wh
On further reading it seems that maybe
&boost=map(popularity_d,0,0,1) might work
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 8:56 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/27/2019 8:54 PM, Mark Sholund wrote:
>> qf=title^5 description^5 _text_
>>
>> And now I want to include additional boost
a map function would get me around
that and it seemed to until I noticed that the qf parameter was being ignored.
Maybe I can use bf instead.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 8:56 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/27/2019 8:54 PM, Mark Sholund wrote:
>> qf=title^5 de
No responses yet, is my question unclear or is this not possible?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:54 PM, Mark Sholund
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using the following to boost based on field content.
>
> qf=title^5 description^5 _text_
>
> And now I want to include additiona
that the score is the same regardless of whether qf is
included or not - this renders qf irrelevant to my query.
Can I do both of these boostings? A multiplicative boost on the fields is
acceptable if that’s possible and simplifies an answer.
- Mark-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version
I noticed this yesterday as well. The toString() and jsonStr() (in later
versions) of SolrJ both include things like
toString():
{id=id=[foo123](https://www.nga.mil/careers/studentopp/Pages/default.aspx), ...}
or
jsonStr():
{"id":"id=[foo123](https://www.nga.mil/careers/studentopp/Pages/default
All,
THIS EMAIL IS PHISHING AND IMPERSONATED MY EMAIL ADDRESS.
PLEASE IGNORE!
Mark
From: Mark Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 1:29:09 PM
Subject: Invoice 6873 from Sobek Digital Hosting and Consulting, LLC 26.06.19
Hi,
Mark used box to share INV
Hi,
Mark used box to share INV-6873
Kindly press REVIEW DOCUMENT
<https://app.box.com/s/st6swhttif7gyh6lzr522ddrsbwjxzj1> to access the secure
document
Please let us know if there is any skipped invoices.
Thank you
Mark V. Sullivan
CIO & Application Architect
Sobek Digit
Hello,
First time poster here so sorry for any formatting problems. I am sorry if
this has been asked before but I've tried several version of SolrJ
(6.5.1-8.1.1) with the same result.
I am runing the following example code and am seeing odd output.
String id = "foo123";
int popularity=1;
Solr
ive as
much context as will fit the available space, and don't worry about
the rest.
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Disregard my previous response. When I reindexed, something went wrong and
so my Lucene database was empty, which explains the immediate results and 0
results. I reindexed again (properly) and all is working find now. Thanks
for the help.
Mark
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 10:40 AM Erick Erickson
sttime listed as one of
the index items. The two rows (Index Analyzer and Query Analyzer) show the
same thing: org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType$DefaultAnalyzer, though I'm
not certain of the implications of this.
I have not attempted your &debug=query suggestion just yet...
Mark
On Fri, Jun 7,
2 minutes and returns 356 records. So something is not quite right, and
I'm too new at this to understand where I went wrong.
Mark
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:52 AM Andrea Gazzarini
wrote:
> Hi Mark, you are using a "range facet" which is a "query-shape" feature,
> it doe
this do? I used +1DAY, but I really have
no idea the purpose of this. I haven't found any documentation that
explains this well.
Mark
a
field using DatePointField. So, how can I determine the set of Java
types that is accepted as a new field value for a field whose field
type's class attribute is X? And where should I have read that?
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University -
We have a SolrCloud cluster (of 3 nodes) running solr 6.4.2. Every night,
we delete and recreate our whole catalog. In this process, we're
simultaneously running a query which recreates the product catalog (which
includes child documents of a different type) and a query that creates a
third documen
xample code that come with the solr
> > distribution, (SolrExampleTests.java), document timestamp fields are
> > added using the same AddField call I am attempting to use, so I am
> > very confused.
> >
> > Thanks for any advice!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill
> >
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 7:10 PM Ken Krugler
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I’ll have a completely new, rebuilt index that’s (a) large, and (b)
> already sharded appropriately.
>
> In that case, using the merge API isn’t great, in that it would take
> significant time and temporarily
the long term way to do this would be to create a collection and then
use the merge API or something to merge your index into the empty
collection.
- Mark
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 5:25 PM Ken Krugler
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Wondering if anyone has experience (this is with Solr 6.6) in s
as a single
success/fail unit.
- Mark
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:25 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> bq. But don't forget a final client.add(list) after the while-loop ;-)
>
> Ha! But only "if (list.size() > 0)"
>
> And then there was the memorable time I forgot the &quo
to use them as infrequently as your use case
allows.
- Mark
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:49 AM Shivam Omar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help in understanding solr soft commits. As soft commits are
> about visibility and are fast in nature. They are advised for nrt use
> cases.
t
side and know where it should end up.
Optimally, you want sendDirectUpdatesToShardLeadersOnly to be true
configured with the correct id field.
- Mark
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:54 AM Bernd Fehling
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> while going from single core master/slave to cloud multi core/node
&g
Yeah, the project should never use built in serialization. I'd file a JIRA
issue. We should remove this when we can.
- Mark
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 9:39 PM Will Currie wrote:
> Premise: During an upgrade I should be able to run a 7.3 pull replica
> against a 7.2 tlog leader. Or
Thanks much Steve for the suggestions and pointers.
Best,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Not sure about the advisability of pursuing UIMA - I’ve never used it with
> Lucene or Solr - but soon-to-be-released Solr 7.3, will include OpenNLP
&
Hi All,
Is it still advisable to pursue UIMA or can some one pls advise something
else to check on related to SOLR and NLP?
Thanks!
Mark
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Robinson
Date: Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:21 PM
Subject: UIMA-SOLR integration
To: solr-user
as getting error with OPEN
CALAIS so was relying only on AlchemyAPI only.
Any immediate help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Mark
which core the log comes from.
How can I tell which core is receiving the offending requests?
Many thanks in advance!
Mark
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Susheel Kumar
> > wrote:
> > > I have used PatternReplaceFilterFactory in some of these situations.
> e.g.
> > > below
> > >
> > >
> > > class="solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory" pattern
gt; Best,
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Mark Johnson
> wrote:
> > Is it possible to configure Solr to treat text that matches a regex as a
> > phrase?
> >
> > I have a database full of products, and the Title and Description fields
> > are tex
Is it possible to configure Solr to treat text that matches a regex as a
phrase?
I have a database full of products, and the Title and Description fields
are text_en, tokenized via the StandardTokenizerFactory. This works in most
cases, but a number of products have names like:
- Vitamin A
- Vi
ion different
> cases, you can go wild. Here's a partial
> list:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/
> Understanding+Analyzers%2C+Tokenizers%2C+and+Filters,
> see the "Tokenizer", "Filters" and CharFilters" links. There are 12
> tokenizers list
Wow, that's really powerful! Thank you!
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Charlie Hull wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Open Source Connection's excellent www.splainer.io might also be useful to
> help you break down exactly what your query is doing.
>
> Cheers
>
> Cha
(or collection) from the drop-down>>analysis
> That shows you exactly how Solr/Lucene break up text at query and index
> time
>
> add &debug=query to the URL. That'll show you how the query was parsed.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:52 AM,
efinition because of copyField. Your
> original fields may be strings.
>
> Remember to reload core and reminded when you change definitions.
>
> Regards,
>Alex
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2017 9:15 AM, "Mark Johnson"
> wrote:
>
> > Forgive me if I'm missing
Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious -- I'm new to Solr, but I can't
seem to find an explanation for the behavior I'm seeing.
If I have a document that looks like this:
{
field1: "aaa bbb",
field2: "ccc ddd",
field3: "eee fff"
}
And I do a search where "q" is "aaa ccc", I get t
the ZK connection is a basic feature from day
one.
Mark
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:34 AM Manohar Sripada
wrote:
> Thanks Erick! Should I create a JIRA issue for the same?
>
> Regarding the logs, I have changed the log level to WARN. That may be the
> reason, I couldn't get
1 - 100 of 2253 matches
Mail list logo