t; does the regex and adds a field has_credit_card_number:true.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Jul 28, 2020, at 11:50 AM, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> >
> > Let's say I have a text field that
Let's say I have a text field that's been indexed with the standard
tokenizer, and I want to match the docs that have credit card numbers in
them (this is for altruistic purposes, not nefarious ones!). What's the
best way to build a search that will do this?
Searching for " " see
Hi All,
I'm attempting to connect to the metrics api in solrj to query metrics from
my cluster. Using the CloudSolrClient, I get routed to one node, and get
metrics only from that node.
I'm building my request like this:
GenericSolrRequest req = new GenericSolrRequest(METHOD.GET,
"/admin/met
Hey Emmanuel,
If you're using Java, I'd highly suggest using solrj, it'll do the work
that you need it to do:
SolrRequest req ;//create a new request object
req.setBasicAuthCredentials(userName, password);
solrClient.request(req);
If that doesn't work for you for some reason, you need to base64
Hi Webster,
When we upgraded from 7.5 to 8.1 we ran into a very strange issue:
https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stored-field-values-don-t-update-after-7-gt-8-upgrade-td4442934.html
We ended up having to do a full re-index to solve this issue, but if you're
going to do this upgrade I would lov
Hi All,
Something we learned recently that might be useful to the community.
We're running solr in docker, and we've constrained each of our containers
to have access to 10G of the host's ram. Also, through `docker stats`, we
can see the Block IO (filesystem reads/writes) that the solr process is
Actually I should clarify: we stop solr on one of the nodes, wait for the
other node to become the leader, and then start solr back up on the one
that was stopped.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 09:41, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> We've seen this type of deadlock pretty often. Our recourse is to
We've seen this type of deadlock pretty often. Our recourse is to restart
solr on only one of the nodes, this seems to force the leader election to
take place and it soon stars rebuilding.
Let me know if you try that and it works... Wouldn't mind another
validation point that this happens to other
Hi Joe,
We fought with Solr on HDFS for quite some time, and faced similar issues
as you're seeing. (See this thread, for example:"
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201812.mbox/%3cCABd9LjTeacXpy3FFjFBkzMq6vhgu7Ptyh96+w-KC2p=-rqk...@mail.gmail.com%3e
)
The Solr lock files
le
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 15:30, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a collection that was created on Solr 7.5, and then Solr was
> upgraded to 8.1 . After the upgrade, we're seeing that the stored values of
> the fields of documents that existed before the upgrade aren&#x
Hi All,
We have a collection that was created on Solr 7.5, and then Solr was
upgraded to 8.1 . After the upgrade, we're seeing that the stored values of
the fields of documents that existed before the upgrade aren't being stored
when the record is updated, even though the indexed value is.
For ex
Hi Boban,
First of all: I agree with Walter here. Because the bottleneck is during
indexing on the leader, a basic round robin load balancer will perform just
as well as a custom solution. With far less headache. A custom solution
will be far more work than it's worth.
But, should you really want
We've seen the same thing on solr 7.5 by doing:
- create a collection
- add some data
- stop solr on all servers
- delete all contents of the solr node from zookeeper
- start solr on all nodes
- create a collection with the same name as in the first step
When doing this, solr wipes out the p
an you share the Solr HDFS configuration settings that you tested
> with? Blockcache and direct memory size? I'd be curious just as a
> reference point.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:31 AM lstusr 5u93n4
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
>
There's some variance to the
results, but the averages are representative of the times we're seeing.
Thanks for reading!
Kyle
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 14:14, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> > What OS is it on?
> CentOS 7
>
> > With yo
Hi Guys,
> What OS is it on?
CentOS 7
> With your indexes in HDFS, the HDFS software running
> inside Solr also needs heap memory to operate, and is probably going to
> set aside part of the heap for caching purposes.
We still have the solr.hdfs.blockcache.slab.count parameter set to the
defaul
still just a copy operation.
>
> All the above is just things that I've seen go wrong, by no means
> exhaustive. I've seen a lot of Solr installations, and never seen one
> be stable with that much disparity between index size and available
> RAM so part of this is "the
he system comes back
online and I can kill it again. :D
Thanks for all your help!
>
> In summary, this seems on the surface to be an extremely undersized
> system, and unless and until you properly size it you'll have problems
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Wed, Dec
ot sure why it can't locate the core, because it's there in
${SOLR_HOME} and also exists on hdfs...
Thanks!
Kyle
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 13:12, lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> We do have logs. Grepping for peersync, I can see
>
> solr | 2018-12-05 0
fore
solr has been launched on the other servers.
Kyle
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 12:58, Kevin Risden wrote:
> Do you have logs right before the following?
>
> "we notice that the nodes go into "Recovering" state for about 10-12 hours
> before finally coming alive."
>
Hi All,
We have a collection:
- solr 7.5
- 3 shards, replication factor 2 for a total of 6 NRT replicas
- 3 servers, 16GB ram each
- 2 billion documents
- autoAddReplicas: false
- 2.1 TB on-disk index size
- index stored on hdfs on separate servers.
If we (gracefully) shut down solr
rite=false option (assuming you're not
> > assigning _version_ yourself)?
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:57 AM lstusr 5u93n4
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have a scenario where I'm trying to
Hi All,
I have a scenario where I'm trying to enable batching on the solrj client,
but trying to see how that works with Optimistic Concurrency.
>From what I can tell, if I pass a list of SolrInputDocument to my solr
client, and a document somewhere in that list contains a `_version_` field
that
econd field
> "level_count" set to 3. Now your secondary search becomes
> "q=whatever&fq=category:Books/NonFic&fq=level_count:2".
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:24 AM lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
> >
> >
Hi,
I have a schema that has a descendent_path field as configured in the
PathTokenizerHierarchyFactory docs:
Using the example in the docs: *For example, in the configuration below a
query for Books/NonFic will match documents indexed with values like
Books/Non
there are issues with autoAddReplicas or other types of failovers
> if there are different home folders.
>
> I've run Solr on HDFS with the same basic configs as listed here:
>
> https://risdenk.github.io/2018/10/23/apache-solr-running-on-apache-hadoop-hdfs.html
>
> Kevin Risden
&g
Hi All,
Here's a question that I can't find an answer to in the documentation:
When configuring solr cloud with HDFS, is it best to:
a) provide a unique hdfs folder for each solr cloud instance
or
b) provide the same hdfs folder to all solr cloud instances.
So for example, if I have two solr
caling-auto-add-replicas.html#using-cluster-property-to-enable-autoaddreplicas
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 3:27 AM lstusr 5u93n4 wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have a solr cloud running 3 shards, 3 hosts, 6 total NRT replicas, and
> > the data director on hdfs.
Hi All,
We have a solr cloud running 3 shards, 3 hosts, 6 total NRT replicas, and
the data director on hdfs. It has 950 million documents in the index,
occupying 700GB of disk space.
We need to completely power off the system to move it.
Are there any actions we should take on shutdown to help t
29 matches
Mail list logo
