Hi,
I'm trying to search within a rectangle using the Filtering by an Arbitrary
Rectangle method, by query below doesn't return any results, I know that items
are present within that area.
http://drupalvm.local:8983/solr/cars/select?&q=:&fq=locs_computed_location:[51.996461924257,-4.770558354898
Hello,
I'm having problems with a polygon search on location data. I've tried to
enable the JTS and Polygons from
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spatial+Search but I get the
following error when I load solr
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
org.apache.solr.co
ldnt say "committers
will be addressing this sometime soon", right?
I'm worried as we need to make a practical decision here and it sounds like
maybe we should stick with solr for now... is that what you are saying?
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hank:
&
Super helpful. Thanks.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/4/2013 12:34 PM, hank williams wrote:
>
>> Ok one more simple question. We just upgraded to 4.6 from 4.2. In 4.2 we
>> were *trying* to use the rest API function "create" to create c
_very_ casual test I found about 1000 cores/second were found in
> discovery mode. While they aren't loaded if they're transient, it's still a
> consideration if you have 10s of thousands.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:33 PM, hank william
Sorry, I see that we are up to solr 4.6. I missed that.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:53 PM, hank williams wrote:
> Also, I see that the "lotsofcores" stuff is for solr 4.4 and above. What
> is the state of the 4.4 codebase? Could we start using it now? Is it safe?
>
>
> On
Also, I see that the "lotsofcores" stuff is for solr 4.4 and above. What is
the state of the 4.4 codebase? Could we start using it now? Is it safe?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:33 PM, hank williams wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
>
ny sense
of what a good upper limit might be, or how we might figure that out?
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, hank williams wrote:
>
> > We are building a system where there is a core for every user. There
> will
> > be many tens or perhaps
We are building a system where there is a core for every user. There will
be many tens or perhaps ultimately hundreds of thousands or millions of
users. We do not need each of those users to have “warm” data in memory. In
fact doing so would consume lots of memory unnecessarily, for users that
mig
Hi,
I'm trying to build a facet search, but I'm having some difficulties.
I can do a free text search over things, but I can build exact queries.
I know that I have a result that has this data
iraq treatment of children hong
kongiraq treatment of
children hong kong
If I do a free text search for a keyword over all my fields using the query
winston churchill
town:*winston churchill* OR label:*winston churchill* OR name:*winston
churchill* OR office:*winston churchill*
I get plenty of results. But If I want to filter the searches down to towns. So
Winston Ch
Great, thank you.
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:42:13 +0100
> From: r@solr.pl
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: facet query
>
> Hello!
>
> Try facet.mincount=1, that should help.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rafał Kuć
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Elas
Hi, is there a way with facets to say, return facets that are not 0? I have
&facet=true&facet.field=office&facet.field=name as my facet parameters, and
with some of my queries it brings back people that have a value of 0.
Thanks
13 matches
Mail list logo
