Sorry, I see that we are up to solr 4.6. I missed that.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:53 PM, hank williams <hank...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, I see that the "lotsofcores" stuff is for solr 4.4 and above. What > is the state of the 4.4 codebase? Could we start using it now? Is it safe? > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:33 PM, hank williams <hank...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Erick Erickson >> <erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> You probably want to look at "transient cores", see: >>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores >>> >>> But millions will be "interesting" for a single node, you must have some >>> kind of partitioning in mind? >>> >>> >> Wow. Thanks for that great link. Yes we are sharding so its not like >> there would be millions of cores on one machine or even cluster. And since >> the cores are one per user, this is a totally clean approach. But still we >> want to make sure that we are not overloading the machine. Do you have any >> sense of what a good upper limit might be, or how we might figure that out? >> >> >> >>> Best, >>> Erick >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:38 PM, hank williams <hank...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > We are building a system where there is a core for every user. There >>> will >>> > be many tens or perhaps ultimately hundreds of thousands or millions of >>> > users. We do not need each of those users to have “warm” data in >>> memory. In >>> > fact doing so would consume lots of memory unnecessarily, for users >>> that >>> > might not have logged in in a long time. >>> > >>> > So my question is, is the default behavior of Solr to try to keep all >>> of >>> > our cores warm, and if so, can we stop it? Also given the number of >>> cores >>> > that we will likely have is there anything else we should be keeping in >>> > mind to maximize performance and minimize memory usage? >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> blog: whydoeseverythingsuck.com >> > > > > -- > blog: whydoeseverythingsuck.com > -- blog: whydoeseverythingsuck.com
