And in the case of both stored=true and docValues=true, Solr 8.x shall be
choosing the optimal approach by itself?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:15 AM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Erick. As indexed is not necessary, and docValues is more
> efficient than stored fields for function queries, so we sh
Thanks Erick. As indexed is not necessary, and docValues is more efficient
than stored fields for function queries, so we shall go with the
following:
3) indexed=false, stored=false, docValues=true.
Is my understanding correct?
Best,
Wei
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 5:24 AM Erick Erickson
, docValues=false
2) indexed=true, stored=false, docValues=true
3) indexed=false, stored=false, docValues=true
What would be the performance implications for these options?
Best,
Wei
-XX:G1MaxNewSizePercent=20
-XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=150
-XX:+DisableExplicitGC
-XX:+DoEscapeAnalysis
-XX:+ParallelRefProcEnabled
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions
Compared to previous Java 8 + CMS on 2 NUMA servers, P99 latency has
improved over 20%.
Thanks,
Wei
On Mon
Thanks Shawn. Looks like Java 11 is the way to go with -XX:+UseNUMA. Do you
see any backward compatibility issue for Solr 8 with Java 11? Can we run
Solr 8 built with JDK 8 in Java 11 JRE, or need to rebuild solr with Java
11 JDK?
Best,
Wei
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 6:44 PM Shawn Heisey wrote
My understanding is that current means whether there is data pending to be
committed.
Best,
Wei
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 5:09 PM Kayak28 wrote:
> Hello, Solr community:
>
>
>
> I would like to ask a question about the current icon on the core-overview
>
> under stat
tml,
seems Java 14 is not officially supported for Solr 8.
Best,
Wei
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:50 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/23/2020 7:42 PM, Wei wrote:
> > Recently we deployed solr 8.4.1 on a batch of new servers with 2 NUMAs. I
> > noticed that query latency almost d
Thanks Dominique. I'll start with the -XX:+UseNUMA option.
Best,
Wei
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 7:04 AM Dominique Bejean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This would be a Java VM option, not something Solr itself can know about.
> Take a look at this article in comments. May be it wil
inter is
appreciated.
Best,
Wei
) does
not work. Is it possible to stop solr from putting facet.query into filter
cache?
Thanks,
Wei
Hi Michael,
I also verified the patch in SOLR-14471 with 8.4.1 and it fixed the issue
with shards.preference=replica.location:local,replica.type:TLOG in my
setting. Thanks!
Wei
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:09 PM Phill Campbell
wrote:
> Yes, JVM heap settings.
>
> > On May 19, 2020,
Hi Phill,
What is the RAM config you are referring to, JVM size? How is that related
to the load balancing, if each node has the same configuration?
Thanks,
Wei
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:07 PM Phill Campbell
wrote:
> In my previous report I was configured to use as much RAM as possi
l Gibney
wrote:
> FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471
> Wei, assuming you have only TLOG replicas, your "last place" matches
> (to which the random fallback ordering would not be applied -- see
> above issue) would be the same as the "first place" matches selec
for shard requests are the first node in each shard
returned from the CLUSTERSTATUS api. Seems something wrong with shuffling
equally compared nodes when shards.preference is set. Will report back if
I find more.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:59 PM Wei wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I am meas
terms of filtering, sorting or faceting, how would query
performance compare between the two?
Thanks,
Wei
:TLOG
Nothing seems to cause the strange behavior. Any suggestions how to
debug this?
-Wei
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 5:42 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Wei:
>
> How are you measuring utilization here? The number of incoming requests or
> CPU?
>
> The leader for each shard are certai
idle. There
is no change in shard handler configuration:
3
3
500
What could cause the unbalanced internal distributed request?
Thanks in advance.
Wei
uce fewer counts.
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:11 AM Wei wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am excited to see Lucene 8 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed
> > improvement https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8135. My
> > question
> > is, how does it
on on this. Any
pointer is greatly appreciated.
Best,
Wei
til
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/solrj/src/java/org/noggit/JSONUtil.java
but seems it is not able to convert parts of the query response such as
facet. Are there any other options available?
Thanks,
Wei
wondering if
the commits could be caused by the leader initialed recovery process. Will
the Tlog leader do extra commits for the replica to sync up in recovery
process?
Best,
Wei
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:22 PM Wei wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> I observed that the update request rate dropped fr
Thanks! Looking forward to have this feature in Solr.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:30 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> Not yet:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:57 PM Wei wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see this lucene o
Hi,
I see this lucene optimization to disable hit counts for better query
performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8060
Is the feature available in Solr 8.3?
Thanks,
Wei
g for the time
out?
Also the bad tlog replica is not reachable at the time, so we did a
DELETEREPLICA command with collections API to remove it from the cloud.
Thanks,
Wei
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:52 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> How long are updates blocked and how did the tlog replica on
requests to the cloud are blocked? Does leader need
to wait for response from each replica to inform client that update is
successful?
Best,
Wei
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 9:59 AM Wei wrote:
> Thanks all. I debugged a bit and see timeAllowed does not limit stats
> call. Also I think it would be useful for solr to support a white list or
> black list of operations as Toke suggested. Will create jira for it.
> Currently seems the
Hi Mikhail,
Yes I have the timeAllowed parameter configured, still is this case it
doesn't seem to prevent the stats request from blocking other normal
queries. Is it possible to drop the request before solr executes it? maybe
at the jetty request filter?
Thanks,
Wei
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019
We are using solr 7.6.2 with a 10
shard cloud set up.
Is there a way to block certain solr queries based on url pattern? i.e.
ignore the stats.calcdistinct request in this case.
Thanks,
Wei
Any suggestion?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:03 PM Wei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding function query that operates on multi-value
> fields. For the following field:
>
> multivalued="true"/>
>
> Each value is a hex string representation of
operates on all values of the
field? Given color S in query, how to calculate the similarities between S
and C1/C2/C3 and find which one is the closest?
I checked https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/function-queries.html but
didn't see an example.
Thanks,
Wei
Hi, Maybe SOLR-12715&SOLR-12716 can help you.
Mark Thill 于2019年7月9日周二 上午2:42写道：
> My scenario is:
>
>- 60 GB collection
>- 2 shards of ~30GB
>- Each shard having 2 replicas so I have a backup
>- So I have 4 nodes with each node holding a single core
>
> My goal is to have autosc
Hi all，
I have a collection1 with 8 shards，each shard‘s replicationFactor=1.
I have an application adding 6000w document with infinite retry if any
Exception catch.
That is to say, finally it should be found 6000w docs when query=*:*.
Normally, all things good, but if in the same time, a
Thanks Erick for the clarification. How does the ps work for fq? I
configured ps=4 for q, it doesn't apply to fq though. For phrase queries in
fq seems ps=0 is used. Is there a way to config it for fq also?
Best,
Wei
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:51 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> q a
e the values for relate parameters such as
ps?
Thanks,
Wei
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 4:51 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/24/2019 5:37 PM, Wei wrote:
> > stored="true"/>
>
> I'm assuming that the asterisks here are for emphasis, that they are not
> actually pre
ream bar” and “vanilla ice cream” , but does not match
for “ice cold cream”.
The results seem neither exact match nor phrase match. What's the expected
behavior for fq on text fields? I have tried to look into the solr docs
but there is no clear explanation.
Thanks,
Wei
Hi all，
I use solr-7.3.1 release，when split a shard1 to shard1_0&shard1_1，
encountered OOM error，then shard1_0&shard1_1 publish a status as
recovery_failed.
How to deal with a shard in recovery_failed status？
Remove shard1_0&shard1_1 and then do split shard1 again?
Or any other way to retry?
Hi，
With current newest version, 9.0.0-snapshot，In
Builder.UnCompileNode.addArc() function，
found this line：
assert numArcs == 0 || label > arcs[numArcs-1].label: "arc[-1].label="
+ arcs[numArcs-1].label + " new label=" + label + " numArcs=" +
numArcs;
Maybe assert tips is ：
assert numArcs ==
completely separate query and updates, I think that I might need to have
the load-balancer set up to include only the PULL replicas. Is there any
other option?
Thanks,
Wei
segment just to add a 1G so
> having multiple segments < 20G is perfectly normal.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Mar 10, 2019, at 10:36 PM, Wei wrote:
> >
> > A side question, for heavy bulk indexing, what's the recommended setting
> > for auto commit? As th
A side question, for heavy bulk indexing, what's the recommended setting
for auto commit? As there is no query needed during the bulking indexing
process, I have auto soft commit disabled. Is there any side effect if I
also disable auto commit?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:22 PM Wei
10
20480
But in the end I see multiple segments much smaller than the 20GB limit.
In 7.6 is it required to explicitly set the number of segments to 1? e.g
shall I use
/update?optimize=true&waitSearcher=false&maxSegments=1
Best,
Wei
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:29 PM Erick Erickson
finished optimization to a single segment, however all the leader replicas
still have multiple segments. Previously inn the all NRT replica cloud, I
see optimization is triggered on all nodes. Is the optimization process
different with Tlog/Pull replicas?
Best,
Wei
uestion directly though, no. Split-shard creates two
> > new subshards, but it doesn't do anything to remove or cleanup the
> > original shard. The original shard remains with its data and will
> > delegate future requests to the result shards.
> >
> > Hope that h
Hi,
If I split shard1 to shard1_0,shard1_1， Is the parent shard1 will
never be clean up？
Best,
Tinswzy
bump..
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:53 AM Wei wrote:
> Thanks Thomas. You mentioned "Also there is no need for the
> FlattenGraphFilter", that's quite interesting because the Solr
> documentation says it's mandatory for indexing:
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/gu
Thanks Thomas. You mentioned "Also there is no need for the
FlattenGraphFilter", that's quite interesting because the Solr
documentation says it's mandatory for indexing:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_6/filter-descriptions.html. Is there
any more explanation for this
dvance for you input.
Thanks,
Wei
ej...@eolya.fr>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are the powerfull JMeter obviously and also SolrMeter (
> > https://github.com/tflobbe/solrmeter).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Dominique
> >
> >
> > Le jeu. 20 déc. 2018 à 03:17, zhenyua
Hi all,
Is there a common tool for SOLR benckmark? YCSB is not very
suitable for SOLR. Currently, Is there a good benchmark tool for SOLR?
Best, TinsWzy
Hi all,
I indexed 4810 documents，and make some kill processes tests.
After all indexed done, I query all many time, and found the numFound is
not the same number. OutPut Example:
"responseHeader":{ "zkConnected":true, "status":0, "QTime":8, "params":{ "q
":"*:*", "_":"1544171213624"}}, "res
there
are more than 1 segments. Is the optimize command async? What is the best
approach to validate that optimize is truly completed?
Thanks,
Wei
Also I notice this issue is still open:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10816
Does that mean we still need to have stored=true for uniqueKey?
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:14 PM Wei wrote:
> I see there is also a docValuesFormat option, what's the default for this
> setting?
I see there is also a docValuesFormat option, what's the default for this
setting? Performance wise is it good to set docValuesFormat="Memory" ?
Best,
Wei
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:55 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Yes, "the most efficient possible" is associated wit
the uniqueKey field need to be
always docValues? Since it is used in the first phase of distributed
search.
Thanks,
Wei
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 8:30 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> 2. "it depends". Solr will try to do the most efficient thing
> possible. If _all_ the fields are
Solr
retrieve id from docValues instead of stored field? if fl= id, title,
score, both id and title are single value field:
Do I need to have all fields stored="false" docValues="true" to make solr
retrieve from docValues only? I am using Solr 6.6.
Thanks,
Wei
Thanks everyone! I checked the system metrics during the optimization
process. CPU usage is quite low, there is no I/O wait, and memory usage is
not much different from before the docValues change. So I wonder what
could be the bottleneck.
Thanks,
Wei
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:38 PM Erick
maxMergeAtOnceExplicit because the default 30
could be too low:
100
But it doesn't seem to help. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Wei
Hi all，
I found it is too troublesome to start a solr mini cluster in my
project，the MiniSolrCloudCluster has too many properties related to the
folders of Solr Source Project. Is there a simple way to start a mini solr
cluster out of Solr Project，such as in my custom Project？
to solr， it will
retry to solr infinitely。
If write to solr is failed，and server was kill，I can use the
transaction log of the true data store to replay and write to solr again。
Shawn Heisey 于2018年9月19日周三 下午10:38写道：
> On 9/18/2018 8:11 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
Walter Underwood
> > wun...@wunderwood.org
> > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> >
> >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 7:11 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>add solr document with overwrite=false will keepping multi version
>
Hi all,
add solr document with overwrite=false will keepping multi version
documents，
My question is ：
1. How to search newest documents？with what options？
2. How to delete old version < newest version documents?
for example:
{
"id":"1002",
"name":["james"]
Hi all，
Does solr support rollback or any method to do the same job？
Like update/add/delete a document, can I rollback them？
Best~
TinsWzy
requests per
second.
Shawn Heisey 于2018年9月18日周二 下午12:07写道：
> On 9/17/2018 9:05 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> > Is that means： Small amount of shards gains better performance？
> > I also have a usecase which contains 3 billion documents，the collection
> > contains 60 shard now. Is th
Is that means： Small amount of shards gains better performance？
I also have a usecase which contains 3 billion documents，the collection
contains 60 shard now. Is that 10 shard is better than 60 shard?
Shawn Heisey 于2018年9月18日周二 上午12:04写道：
> On 9/17/2018 7:04 AM, KARTHICKRM wrote:
> > Dear SO
;
> }
>
> Got it now? :)
>
> Petr
> ______
> > Od: "zhenyuan wei"
> > Komu: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Datum: 03.09.2018 11:21
> > Předmět: Re: Is that a mistake or bug?
> >
> >
ach server
will only host 2 of the 5 shards( 2 JVMs per server, each JVM have one
replica from different shards). Is it useful to set preferLocalShards=true
in this case?
Thanks,
Wei
ot;:0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
&q
ot;:0.0},
"facet_module":{
"time":0.0},
"mlt":{
"time":0.0},
"highlight":{
"time":0.0},
"stats":{
"time":0.0},
"expand":{
&
Hi ，
I am curious “How long does a query q=field1:2312 cost , which
exactly match only one document? ”， Of course we just discuss no
queryResultCache with match in this situation.
In fact my QTime is 150ms+， it is too long.
;
> The only line that could be improved, is probably replacing
> "Boolean.FALSE" by simply "false", but that is really a minor thing...
>
> Regards
>
> PB
> ______
> > Od: "zhenyuan wei&quo
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:09 AM zhenyuan wei wrote:
>
> > Yeah，got it~. So the QueryResult.segmentTerminatedEarly maybe a boolean,
> > instead of Boolean, is better， right?
> >
> > Mikhail Khludnev 于2018年9月3日周一 下午1:36写道：
> >
> > > It's neit
in result output. see
> ResponseBuilder.setResult(QueryResult).
> So, if cmd requests early termination, it sets false by default, enabling
> "false" output even it won't be the case. And later it might be flipped to
> true.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:57 AM zheny
#x27;? I cannot find more relevant
documentation on how to configure and customize 'snitch'.
Thanks,
Wei
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 9:30 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> You need to provide a "snitch" and define a rule appropriately. This
> is a variant of "rack awareness"
Hi all,
I saw the code like following:
QueryResult result = new QueryResult();
cmd.setSegmentTerminateEarly(params.getBool(CommonParams.SEGMENT_TERMINATE_EARLY,
CommonParams.SEGMENT_TERMINATE_EARLY_DEFAULT));
if (cmd.getSegmentTerminateEarly()) {
result.setSegmentTerminatedEarly(Boolean.FAL
for defining the physical host?
Thanks,
Wei
as you want.
>
> The node placement rules are primarily intended for automated or very large
> setups. Manually placing replicas is simpler for limited numbers.
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 8:10 PM Wei wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Shawn. When using multiple Sol
Oh ~ my fault！Sorry for that， I should say somebody，like me~
Bram Van Dam 于2018年8月29日周三 下午3:28写道：
> On 28/08/18 08:03, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> > But this is not a common way to do so, I mean, nobody want to ADDREPLICA
> > after collection was created.
>
> I wouldn't say "nobody"..
>
Pretty cool，here creates an issue to put this discussion into practice.
issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12713
Best,
TinsWzy
Erick Erickson 于2018年8月28日周二 下午11:51写道：
> Patches welcome.
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018, 23:03 zhenyuan wei wrote:
>
> > But this is n
d you can have as many replicas per Solr instance
> as makes sense.
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:48 PM zhenyuan wei wrote:
> >
> > @Christopher Schultz
> > So you mean that one 4TB disk is the same as four 1TB disks ?
> > HDFS、cassandra、
xplain
Christopher Schultz 于2018年8月28日周二 上午11:16写道：
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Shawn,
>
> On 8/27/18 22:37, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > On 8/27/2018 8:29 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> >> I found the “solr.data.dir” can only config a single directory.
&g
写道：
> On 8/27/2018 8:29 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> > I found the “solr.data.dir” can only config a single directory. I
> > think it is necessary to be config multi dirs，such as
> > ”solr.data.dir:/mnt/disk1,/mnt/disk2,/mnt/disk3" ， due to one disk
> overload
>
Hi all,
I found the “solr.data.dir” can only config a single directory. I
think it is necessary to be config multi dirs，such as
”solr.data.dir:/mnt/disk1,/mnt/disk2,/mnt/disk3" ， due to one disk overload
or capacity limitation. Any reason to support why not do so？
Best,
TinsWzy
@Shawn Heisey Yeah, delete "write.lock" files manually is ok finally。
@Walter Underwood Have some performace evaluation about Solr on HDFS vs
LocalFS recently?
Shawn Heisey 于2018年8月28日周二 上午4:10写道：
> On 8/26/2018 7:47 PM, zhenyuan wei wrote:
> > I found an exception w
Thanks Bernd. Do you have preferLocalShards=true in both cases? Do you
notice CPU/memory utilization difference between the two deployments? How
many servers did you use in total? I am curious what's the bottleneck for
the one instance and 3 cores configuration.
Thanks,
Wei
On Mon, A
Erickson 于2018年8月27日周一 上午11:41写道：
> Because HDFS doesn't follow the file semantics that Solr expects.
>
> There's quite a bit of background here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8335
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 6:47 PM zhenyuan wei
will be
able to get better CPU utilization on multi-core server?
Thanks,
Wei
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 4:37 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/26/2018 12:00 AM, Wei wrote:
> > I have a question about the deployment configuration in solr cloud. When
> > we need to increase the number of
Hi all，
I found an exception when running Solr on HDFS。The detail is：
Running solr on HDFS，and update doc was running always，
then，kill -9 solr JVM or reboot linux os/shutdown linux os，then restart all.
The exception appears like：
2018-08-26 22:23:12.529 ERROR
(coreContainerWorkExecutor-2-thr
per host, and have multiple cores(shards) in the
same solr instance.
Which would be better performance wise? For the first option I think JVM
size for each solr instance can be smaller, but deployment is more
complicated? Are there any differences for cpu utilization?
Thanks,
Wei
I got the debug info like this. It turns out that queryNorm is
negative so the total solr score is negative too. It is not really a
problem for me. But I'm curious why it can even be negative after
reading its definition (1/sumOfSquaredWeights)?
-1.1151254E-4 = (MATCH) product of:
-0.0032338637
Hi All，
I am confuse about How to hit filterCache？
If filterQuery is range [3 to 100] , but not cache in FilterCache，
and filterCache already exists filterQuery range [2 to 100],
My question is " Dose this filterQuery range [3 to 100] will fetch DocSet
from FilterCache range[2 to 100]" ?
Count on filterCache, find alternatives to
> wildcard query and more.
>
> But all in all, I'd be very very satisfied with those low response times
> given the size of your data.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
&
Thanks for your detail answer @Shawn
Yes I run the query in SolrCloud mode, and my collection has 20 shards,
each shard size is 30~50GB。
4 solr server, each solr JVM use 6GB, HDFS datanode are 4 too, each
datanode JVM use 2.5GB。
Linux server host are 4 node too，each node is 16 core/32GB RAM/1600G
I have 4 solr server, each allocated 6GB。My dataset on HDFS is 787GB, 2 billion
documents totally，each document is 300 Bytes。 Follow is my cache related
configuration。
20
200
zhenyuan wei 于2018年8月23日周四 下午5:41写道：
> Thank you very much to answer. @Jan Høydahl
> My query is simple
ponent spends the most time?
> With shards.info=true you see what shard is the slowest, if your index is
> sharded.
> With echoParams=all you get the full list of query parameters in use,
> perhaps you spot something?
> If you start Solr with -v option then you get more verbose logg
Hi all，
I do care query performance, but do not know how to find out the reason
why a query so slow.
*How to trace one query？*the debug/debugQuery info are not enough to find
out why a query is slow。
Thanks a lot~
Hi,
Does anyone know what the default scorer for 4.10 is? BM25 or classic
tf-idf?
I have been trying to change that, in cloud mode. I have managed to change
the schema.xml in the zookeeper to add the following lines:
The commented line was also tried. So I have tried different syntax, usin
Thanks Mikhail! Is traditional facet subject to timeAllowed?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> One note: enum facets might be stopped by timeAllowed.
>
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 1:45 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> > Hello, Wei.
> >
> > "
Expansion and Document
collection" . Does that mean Solr will not abort the request if
timeAllowed is exceeded during the scoring process? What are the components
(query, facet, stats, debug etc) this metric is effectively used?
Thanks,
Wei
Hi all,
My solr version is release7.3.1, and I follow the solr 7.3.0 ref guide to
config ganglia
reporter in solr.xml as below:
..
emr-header-1
8649
than start solr service and encounted the execption like:
2018-07-11 17:47:31.246 ERROR (main) [ ] o.a
btw, is there any difference if the fq field is a string field vs test
field?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Wei wrote:
> Thanks Erick and Andrea! If my default operator is OR, fq=
> my_text_field:(Jurassic park the movie) is equivalent to
> my_text_field:(Jurassic
> OR pa
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
