Hi,
good feature to have,
maintaining top N would also require storing all the search queries
done so far and keep updating (or atleast in some time window).
having pluggable persistent storage for all time search queries would be great.
tell me how can I help?
-umar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12
me to get the result
>
> Thanks,
> Raju
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/custome-query-parser.-tp23321502p23321502.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Umar Shah
Rese
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Andrey Klochkov
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Andrey Klochkov
>> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Base on docs in the wiki I thought that the following qu
oducts have higher score than others. What I need and what
> function query seems have to do is to find ONLY socks and assign constant
> score to all of them. Isn't it correct? I took function query with constant
> value just as an example.
>
> --
gt; Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Umar Shah
Research Engineer
Wisdomtap Solutions India (P) Ltd.
---
Get WisdomRank for your products @ http://services.wisdomtap.com
View o
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : I am using the same folder to start solr/ jetty on many local machines
> : running same version of linux.
>
> if the same solr + jetty + solr.solr.home combination is working for you
> on other machines, then i don'
Hi,
I am experiencing a strange behavior while using the default example solr/
jetty container on a hosted ubuntu 7.10 linux machine
after running
java -jar start.jar
from the example folder, it just outputs 2 lines and hangs
2008-07-01 09:46:35.299::INFO: Logging to STDERR via
org.mortbay.log.
thanks Hoss,
once again.
-umar
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : I am using a servlet filter to alter the query parms sent to the solr ,
> : now I have a problem where I want to take some extra action (like drop
> some
> : query terms or filters
2008/6/9 Mihails Agafonovs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi!
>
> Some questions:
> 1) Is it possible to make Solr to use, for example, MySQL database,
> or it only supports *.xml files as a database?
you can use DataImportHandler to index from MySql (or other databases)
>
> 2) Is there a way to add da
outside via
a properties file or something similar)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks hoss,
>
> will surely do that.
>
> -umar
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Hi,
I am using a servlet filter to alter the query parms sent to the solr ,
now I have a problem where I want to take some extra action (like drop some
query terms or filters ) if the current query returns no reults.
Now my question is
How can i efficiently get the count of the results for a spec
thanks hoss,
will surely do that.
-umar
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : I am using function queries to rank the results,
> : if some/ allthe fields (used in the function ) are missing from the
> document
> : what will be the ranking behavior fo
Hi,
is there some way of limiting the results above some fixed threshold?
thanks in anticipation
-umar
Hi,
I am using function queries to rank the results,
if some/ allthe fields (used in the function ) are missing from the document
what will be the ranking behavior for such documents?
thanks
-umar
Hi,
I have a problem wherein
I have field 'type' which can have value A, B C,
I want to return facet count for each type but need only show one type of
result ( say with max count)
so if i have following counts
type:A = 300
type:B = 400
type:D = 100
I should only show type:B results (fq=type
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Savory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/5/21 Dan Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > One year between releases is a very long time for such a useful and
> > dynamic system. Are project leaders willing to (re)consider the
> > development process to pr
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:26 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> hi,Thank you for your reply.
>
> delete operation worked for both query and by id , can u plz help me out
> for
> analyzer (what u mean by default schema xml),i tried out by using 'filed
> name as text' even i didnt get
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:26 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> hi umar, thanks for ur reply ...
>
> As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well...
>
> i have two more question
> 1) how to delete an id in a solr
>
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMes
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 6:56 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> hello umar,
>
> Thank u so much for replying me.
>
> I have a requirement that i have to display first 10 values in jsp page .
> In
> that page itself i have (NEXT) button while clicking, it should query the
> next 10 reco
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:16 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> hi this is rekha,iam new to solr..
>
> I need to search the solr with limits,for example if we are going to get
> 100
> records ,those records should be seperated to 10 records each in seperate
> xml .can any one give me the
Hi,
I'm using the latest trunk code from SOLR .
I am basically using function queries (sum, product, scale) for my project
which are not present in 1.2.
I wanted to know if there is some decided date for release of Solr1.3.
If the date is far/ not decide, what should be the best practice to adopt
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Did you put a filter-mapping in web.xml?
>
>
> no,
> I just did that and i
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you put a filter-mapping in web.xml?
no,
I just did that and it seems to be working...
what is filter-mapping required for?
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Umar Shah <[EMAIL
x27;t see anything in the contents of the file..
thanks for your help
-umar
>
> Look at
>
> http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/05/10/servlet_filters.html?page=1for
> more details.
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ueries and then pass the processed text
to solr request handler and I need to pack this servlet class file into Solr
war file.
But How would I ensure that my servlet is called instead of solr request
handler?
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Can you point me to some documentation?
> :
> chain.doFilter( myRequest, response );
>
> And you have MyServletRequestWrapper that extends ServletRequestWrapper.
> Then you can get|set q* parameters through getParameter() method.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Koji
>
>
>
Hi,
Due some requirement I need to transform the user queries before passing it
to the standard handler in Solr, can anyone suggest me the best way to do
this.
I will need to use a transfomation class that would provide functions to
process the input query 'qIn' and transform it to the resultant
.
>
> (It is hard for developers who are very familiar with a system to write
> good documentation for beginners, alas.)
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 8-May-08, at 11:44 PM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
> thanks mike,
>>
>> some how it was not evident from the wiki example, or i w
thanks mike,
some how it was not evident from the wiki example, or i was too presumptious
;-).
-umar
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7-May-08, at 11:40 PM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> That would be sufficient for my
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7-May-08, at 5:01 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values
>> for
>> ranking the results,
>> can I also
Hi,
I want to use result of a function query based on multiple field values for
ranking the results,
can I also return the value of the computed function along with other fields
of the documents returned.
thanks in anticipation
-umar
oblems or just wondering if there
> will be a performance problem?
>
> -Grant
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:08 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to know what would be the performance of SOLR for the following
>> scenario:
>> the docum
Hi,
I wanted to know what would be the performance of SOLR for the following
scenario:
the documents contain say 200 fields with
say 100 of the fields (containing numbers)
and rest containing short strings of 40-50 character length.
the sparseness of the data can be assumed to be as approximately
hi,
a related question:
is there some way where we can specify action based on
whether field A exists or not?
-umar
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If every document will definitely have a value for both fields, you can
> do...
>q
Hi,
If i through a query at the solr index , is there a mechanism where i can
find out which fields matced the query... (score of that match).
Example:
for Fields A,B and C,
if query q has term1 term2 term3
Field A matches term1 term 2
Field C matches term3
can i get component scores of the whol
If you want this behavior then the field type should not be 'text'.
for default fieldtype=text there are many filters applied before the values
are indexed, this includes stemming (reducing the word to root word,
removing s in ur case.
try using fieldtype=string instead. this will match strictly t
Thanks!
I'll have a look at that.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> : I am computing a sorted rank list and returning a slice (for pagination)
> but
> : have to recompute the result for each request, although the actual q
> : parameter and fq would be
thanks ryan
seems like this would be helpful.
will try it out.
thanks again.
-umar
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> : > 2. Augment the documents with a field value -- this is a bit more
> : > complex and runs the risk of name collisions with field
ate,
I'm okay, to resolve name collision , how do I add the field.. any specific
methods to do that?
> If #1 works, go with that...
>
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
> > thanks ryan for the reply.
> >
> > I have looked at
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
> -- you can programatically change the response at runtime.
>
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2008, at 3:38 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to know whether we can append a field (Fdyn say) t
Hi,
it took me some but I implemented the required function by developing a
custom plugin for our specific example. However Now I have another issue:
I am computing a sorted rank list and returning a slice (for pagination) but
have to recompute the result for each request, although the actual q
p
Hi,
I wanted to know whether we can append a field (Fdyn say) to each doc in the
returned set
Fdyn is computed as some complex function of the fields stored in the index
during the runtime in SOLR.
-umar
On 3/21/08, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : I am investigating to implement an aggregate average function for a
> document
>
> : and require help for the same.
>
>
> First off: please don't repost the same email with a different subject
> (on either solr list) just because you do
Hi,
I am investigating to implement an aggregate average function for a document
and require help for the same.
The problem is that I have documents containing manufacturer, product,
rating (m,p,r)
and i want to find the top manufacturers for product (p1,p2,...) can be
around 10 to 20 products
Hi,
I have a problem of returning an list of results which is sorted on a
average of ranks returned from aggregates.
the qury would be something like ?
q=product:p1+product:p2+product:p3; sort score desc
To explain Supose I have documents with fields Product, Manufacturer, Rank
and I want to return
- Solr - Nutch
>
> - Original Message
> From: Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2008 7:03:32 AM
> Subject: Re: ranking on Multivalued fields
>
> Hi Otis,
>
> thanks for the reply,
>
> consid
matext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> From: Umar Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2008 1:17:35 AM
> Subject: ranking on Multivalued fields
>
> Hi,
>
> I
y for the
category:X
thanks
Umar Shah
48 matches
Mail list logo
