Re: support for Payload Feature of lucene in solr

ving your problem than adding payload support to Solr? Anyway, I don't >> see payload support before 1.5 >> >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Sumit Aggarwal >> wrote: >> >> Hey Nobel, >>> Any comments on Grant suggestion. >>> >>>

Re: support for Payload Feature of lucene in solr

Hey Nobel, Any comments on Grant suggestion. Thanks, -Sumit On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote: > Hi Walter, > I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload > feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own search >

Re: support for Payload Feature of lucene in solr

Hi Walter, I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own search server. For that i need payloads feature in solr itself. I raised a related question and got a message from *Grant* as * "**I added a new De

support for Payload Feature of lucene in solr

Hi, As i am new to solr and trying to explore payloads in solr but i haven't got any success on that. In one of the thread Grant mentioned solr have DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter which can store payloads at index time. But to make search on it we will require implementation of BoostingTermQuery exte

Re: Distributed Search in Solr

Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote: > > Hi, >> 1. Calls made to multiple shards are made in some concurrent fashion or >> serially? >> > > Concurrent > > 2. Any idea of algorithm followed for merging data? I mean

Distributed Search in Solr

Hi, 1. Calls made to multiple shards are made in some concurrent fashion or serially? 2. Any idea of algorithm followed for merging data? I mean how efficient it is? 3. Lucene provides payload concept. How can we make search using that in solr. My application store payloads and use search using our

Re: Index partitioning with solr multiple core feature

/solr/IndexPartitioning ? My actual concern is performance irrespective of implementation design considering a good scaling logic also for future . On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwa

Re: Index partitioning with solr multiple core feature

Shalin, at a time i will be doing search only on one entity... Also data will be indexed only to corresponding entity. Thanks, Sumit On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote: > Hi Shalin, > Yes i want to achieve a logical separation of indexes for performance > reason

Re: Index partitioning with solr multiple core feature

different applications theoritically Does solr provides any good support for index partitioning. Thanks, Sumit On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal >wrote: > > > I was tryin

Re: Index partitioning with solr multiple core feature

I forgot to mention i already have a partitioning to 3 different servers for each entity based on some unique int value. On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote: > I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core > feature. > So my solr.xm

Index partitioning with solr multiple core feature

I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core feature. So my solr.xml is like : Now using http://localhost:8983/solr/User/ or http://localhost:8983/solr/Group/ i am able to reach seperate partition for entity based search. Now question arises for entity based in

Re: Question on Facet Count

, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Sumit Aggarwal > wrote: > > > Hi Shalin, > > specifying facet.query='small'&facet.query=large will actually filter the > > result also.and it wont give me facet count for both at the same > > time... > > i will give total res

Re: Best and industry acceptable configuration for solr for large data

Can any one please give me some insight best/industry acceptable configuration for solr. My Requirement is : 1. Indexes scaled to 3 boxes. (What is best partitioning index strategies) 2. Replicated Index servers for each box... 3.. Each box will have than multiple index folders also based on type o

Re: Question on Facet Count

ress" and "large" Thanks, Sumit Thanks, Sumit On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar < > shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at

Re: Question on Facet Count

iki: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#head-1da3ab3995bc4abcdce8e0f04be7355ba19e9b2c > > Bill > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Sumit Aggarwal >wrote: > > > > > > > Suppose i wanted to search for red dress and i want to get facet

Re: Question on Facet Count

> > Suppose i wanted to search for red dress and i want to get facet count for > term size-medium, size-large... Basically i wanted to get facet count for > some predefined terms in result set. How can i do it? > once i got facet count now i want result set for red dress and size-medium. > i hope i

Question on Facet Count

Suppose i wanted to search for red dress and i want to get facet count for term size-medium, size-large... Basically i wanted to get facet count for some predefined terms in result set. How can i do it? once i got facet count now i want result set for red dress and size-medium. i hope i can achive