nding on the query
string).
Thanks!
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
other solution was to set defaultOperator to
OR, but I wasn't sure how this would affect my other queries. Would
explicit AND operators now become OR operators?
Anyway, thanks to Erik for helping me troubleshoot this!
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com |
Sorry, what do you mean "explicit category rather than boolean expression"?
Type was not changed midstream - hasn't really been changed ever, really.
And I happen to have *just* reindexed, too.
Don't seem to have a default operator set. Not sure how to do it, either...
0 = fieldNorm(field=category_ids_im, doc=4268)
LuceneQParser
...
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Steven Ou wrote:
> Actually, I take that back. Using q instead of fq still produces the same
&
Actually, I take that back. Using q instead of fq still produces the same
problem. Somehow it's *less* inconsistent so at first glance it looked like
it fixed it. However, it does *not* fix it :(
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
third category id the
number of results *went down*. Which is consistently inconsistent, per se.
Adding an OR cannot, logically, reduce the number of results!
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Erik Hatcher
By turning fq=category_ids_im:(637+OR+639+OR+634) to
q=category_ids_im:(637+OR+639+OR+634)
it appears to produce the correct results. But... that doesn't seem to make
sense to me? Shouldn't it work just fine as a filter query?
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Off
0.0
0.0
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Steven Ou wrote:
> Heh, yeah, I bolded the numbers for emphasis. The field type follows.
>
> *Dynamically Created From Pattern:
> **_IM<http://192
: *(unstored field)
*Index Analyzer: *org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType$DefaultAnalyzer
*Query Analyzer: *org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType$DefaultAnalyzer
*Docs: *33730
*Distinct: *528
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Thu, Feb 9, 201
t
produces NO RESULTS!
Any ideas what might be wrong? Really appreciate any help!
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
thing about disabling caching, so I took
out the queryResultCache. Is that right?
What else do I need to do to get NRT working? Do I need to switch some
engine to Solr-RA? If so, how do I do that? Are there other caches I need
to disable?
Any help appreciated. Thanks.
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* |
Yeah, running Chrome on OSX and doesn't do anything.
Just switched to Firefox and it works. *But*, also don't seem to be
receiving confirmation email.
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
2011/12/12 vikram kamath
> The On
All the links on the download section link to http://solr-ra.tgels.org/#
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
2011/12/11 Nagendra Nagarajayya
> Steven:
>
> Not sure why you had problems, #downloads (
> http://solr-
(i.e. just use the normal Lucene
library)?
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Nagendra Nagarajayya <
nnagaraja...@transaxtions.com> wrote:
> Steven:
>
> Please take a look at Solr wi
up taking my site down
for a couple hours. I am very hesitant to upgrade to Solr 4 if it's not
necessary to get some sort of NRT functionality.
Can anyone help me? Thanks!
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
her 5 types.
As for RandomSortField + function queries... I'm not sure I understand how I
can use that to achieve what I need :-/
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> >
resented than
other types).
Anyone know if there's a way to do something like this in Solr?
Much appreciated. Thanks.
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
17 matches
Mail list logo
