Sorry, what do you mean "explicit category rather than boolean expression"?
Type was not changed midstream - hasn't really been changed ever, really.
And I happen to have *just* reindexed, too.
Don't seem to have a default operator set. Not sure how to do it, either...?
--
Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
*ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Extremely odd.
>
> Hmmm... other things to try:
>
> * query on an explicit category, rather than in a boolean expression
> * try a different field type than sint (say just int, or string)
> * shouldn't matter (since you're using "OR" explicitly) but double check
> the default operator in schema.xml
> * reindex (was the field type ever changed mid-stream?)
>
> Definitely something fishy here. Nothing obvious pops out yet.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 19:53 , Steven Ou wrote:
>
> > Actually, I take that back. Using q instead of fq still produces the same
> > problem. Somehow it's *less* inconsistent so at first glance it looked
> like
> > it fixed it. However, it does *not* fix it :(
> > --
> > Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >
> > *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> > steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Steven Ou <steve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, keeping all other filter queries the same, changing fq=
> >> category_ids_im:(637+OR+639) to fq=category_ids_im:(637+OR+639+OR+634)
> >> causes results to not show up.
> >>
> >> In fact, I took out *all* other filter queries. And while I wasn't able
> >> to reproduce it exactly, nonetheless when I added the third category id
> the
> >> number of results *went down*. Which is consistently inconsistent, per
> >> se. Adding an OR cannot, logically, reduce the number of results!
> >> --
> >> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >>
> >> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> >> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, certainly should work fine as a filter query... I was merely
> trying
> >>> to eliminate variables from the equation. You've got several filters
> and a
> >>> q=*:* going on below, so it's obviously harder to pinpoint what could
> be
> >>> going wrong. I suggest continuing to eliminate variables here, as more
> >>> than likely some other filter is causing the documents you think should
> >>> appear to be filtered out.
> >>>
> >>> Erik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 19:24 , Steven Ou wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> By turning fq=category_ids_im:(637+OR+639+OR+634) to
> >>>> q=category_ids_im:(637+OR+639+OR+634)
> >>>> it appears to produce the correct results. But... that doesn't seem to
> >>> make
> >>>> sense to me? Shouldn't it work just fine as a filter query?
> >>>> --
> >>>> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >>>>
> >>>> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> >>>> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Steven Ou <steve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I don't really know how to analyze the debug output... Here it is for
> >>> the
> >>>>> full query I'm running, which includes other filter queries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <lst name="debug">
> >>>>> <str name="rawquerystring">*:*</str>
> >>>>> <str name="querystring">*:*</str>
> >>>>> <str name="parsedquery">MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*)</str>
> >>>>> <str name="parsedquery_toString">*:*</str>
> >>>>> <lst name="explain"/>
> >>>>> <str name="QParser">LuceneQParser</str>
> >>>>> <arr name="filter_queries">
> >>>>> <str>type:Event</str>
> >>>>> <str>displayable_b:true</str>
> >>>>> <str>category_ids_im:(637 OR 639 OR 634)</str>
> >>>>> <str>end_datetime_dt:[2012\-02\-10T00\:17\:52Z TO *]</str>
> >>>>> <str>{!geofilt}</str>
> >>>>> </arr>
> >>>>> <arr name="parsed_filter_queries">
> >>>>> <str>type:Event</str>
> >>>>> <str>displayable_b:true</str>
> >>>>> <str>
> >>>>> category_ids_im:637 category_ids_im:639 category_ids_im:634
> >>>>> </str>
> >>>>> <str>end_datetime_dt:[1328833072000 TO *]</str>
> >>>>> <str>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> SpatialDistanceQuery(geofilt(latlonSource=coordinates_lls(double(coordinates_lls_0_coordinate),double(coordinates_lls_1_coordinate)),latCenter=37.7561438,lonCenter=-122.4325682,dist=50.0,latMin=37.30648363225355,latMax=38.20580396774645,lonMin=-123.0013021058511,lonMax-121.86383429414894,lon2Min=-180.0,lon2Max180.0,calcDist=true,planetRadius=6371.009))
> >>>>> </str>
> >>>>> </arr>
> >>>>> <lst name="timing">
> >>>>> <double name="time">1.0</double>
> >>>>> <lst name="prepare">
> >>>>> <double name="time">1.0</double>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">1.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="process">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.MoreLikeThisComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.HighlightComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.StatsComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> <lst name="org.apache.solr.handler.component.DebugComponent">
> >>>>> <double name="time">0.0</double>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> </lst>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> >>>>> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Steven Ou <steve...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Heh, yeah, I bolded the numbers for emphasis. The field type
> follows.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Dynamically Created From Pattern: **_IM<
> >>> http://192.168.1.30:8080/solr/admin/schema.jsp#>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Field Type: *SINT <http://192.168.1.30:8080/solr/admin/schema.jsp#
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Schema: *Indexed, Multivalued, Omit Norms
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Index: *(unstored field)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Index Analyzer: *org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType$DefaultAnalyzer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Query Analyzer: *org.apache.solr.schema.FieldType$DefaultAnalyzer
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Docs: *33730
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *Distinct: *528
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> >>>>>> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Erik Hatcher <
> erik.hatc...@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What type of field is category_ids_im?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And I'm assuming that the *'s below are for emphasis and not really
> >>> in
> >>>>>>> your query?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Try your query in the q parameter and turn on debug
> >>> (&debugQuery=true)
> >>>>>>> and see how your query is parsing. That'll likely tell all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Erik
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 18:42 , Steven Ou wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hey guys, I'm stumped - hope someone can help!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Basically, I'm running a filter query that filters by category
> (e.g.
> >>>>>>>> fq=category_ids_im:(637 OR 639 OR 634)). However, it often
> produces
> >>> no
> >>>>>>>> results whatsoever even though each individual query *does*
> produce
> >>>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So, for example, fq=category_ids_im:*637* produces
> >>>>>>>> results. fq=category_ids_im:*639* produces results.
> >>>>>>>> fq=category_ids_im:*634* produces
> >>>>>>>> results. Even fq=category_ids_im:(*637* OR *639*) produces
> results,
> >>> as
> >>>>>>> well
> >>>>>>>> as fq=category_ids_im:(*639* OR *634*).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> BUT as soon as I do fq=category_ids_im:(*637* OR *639* OR *634*),
> it
> >>>>>>>> produces NO RESULTS!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Any ideas what might be wrong? Really appreciate any help!
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Steven Ou | 歐偉凡
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> *ravn.com* | Chief Technology Officer
> >>>>>>>> steve...@gmail.com | +1 909-569-9880
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
