nal Message -
> From: "Shawn Heisey"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:03:33 AM
> Subject: [MASSMAIL]Re: Trending functionality in Solr
>
> On 2/7/2015 9:26 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Is there a way to implement the trending functiona
and make a proper SOLR contribution
> :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
> On 08.02.15 05:26, S.L wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Is there a way to implement the trending functionality using Solr , to
>> give
>> the results using a query for
Folks,
Is there a way to implement the trending functionality using Solr , to give
the results using a query for say the most searched terms in the past hours
or so , if the most searched terms is not possible is it possible to at
least the get results for the last 100 terms?
Thanks
Great, this is the first example I have seen so far, I wish we could
include this in the Wiki. Thanks again!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> :
> : Thanks for giving multiple options , I ll try them out both ,but last
> time
> : I checked, having "+60SECONDS" as the defau
Thanks for giving multiple options , I ll try them out both ,but last time
I checked, having "+60SECONDS" as the default value for ttl was giving me
an invalid date format exception, I am assuming that would only be the
case if I use it with the default mechanism in schema.xml, but not when we
I am trying to use the DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactoryfactory in Solr
4.10.1 version.
I have included the following in my solrconfig.xml
id
timestamp
30
ttl
expire_at
Hi All,
I have a use case where I need to group documents that have a same field
called bookName , meaning if there are a multiple documents with the same
bookName value and if the user input is searched by a query on bookName ,
I need to be able to group all the documents by the same bookName to
you send.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:14 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a question regarding distrib=false on the Solr query , it seems
> that
> > the distribution is restricted across only the shards when the parameter
>
Hi All,
I have a question regarding distrib=false on the Solr query , it seems that
the distribution is restricted across only the shards when the parameter
is set to false, meaning if I query a particular node with in a shard with
replication factor of more than one , the request could go to an
omehow 5 of your servers are configured to
> > expect a different character than the server that works. I'm afraid
> > I don't know Tomcat well enough to direct you there, but take a
> > look here:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
> >
> > Sorry I can't
and tail the logs on all the servers. What we're looking for here is
> whether the sub-queries even make it to Solr or whether the problem
> is in your container.
>
> 3> If the sub-queries do NOT make it to the Solr logs, what is the query
> that the container sees? Is it
Hi All,
I am using SolrCloud 4.10.1 and I have 3 shards with replication factor of
2 , i.e is 6 nodes altogether.
When I query the server1 out of 6 nodes in the cluster with the below query
, it works fine , but any other node in the cluster when queried with the
same query results in a *HTTP Sta
to be taken for cloud setup. Please note that for both
> solutions, re-index is mandatory.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:15 PM, S.L
> wrote:
> Ahmet,
>
> Thank you , as the configurations in SolrCloud are uploaded to zookeeper ,
> are there
all about multivalued fields.
>
> I guess, A simple javascript that splits on whitespace and returns the
> produced array size would do the trick :
> StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory
>
>
>
> At this point you have a int field named word count.
> boost=div(1,wordC
Mikhail,
Thank you for confirming this , however Ahmet's proposal seems more simpler
to implement to me .
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> S.L,
>
> I briefly skimmed Lucene50NormsConsumer.writeNormsField(), my
> grained and flexible control over it.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:22 PM, S.L
> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Mikhail Thanks , I looked at the explain and this is what I see for the two
> different documents in questions, they have identical scores
Name:"iphon 4 s 16 gb"~1
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> It's worth to look into to check particular scoring values. But
> for most suspect is the reducing precision when float norms are stored in
> byte vals.
Anyone ?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:45 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a situation where I need to boost the score of a query if a field
> (imageURL) in the given document is non empty , I am using edismax so I
> know that using bq parameter would solve the problem. Ho
I have two documents doc1 and doc2 and each one of those has a field called
phoneName.
doc1:phoneName:"Details about Apple iPhone 4s - 16GB - White (Verizon)
Smartphone Factory Unlocked"
doc2:phoneName:"Apple iPhone 4S 16GB for Net10, No Contract, White"
Here if I search for
q=iphone+4s+16gb&qf
Hi All,
I have a situation where I need to boost the score of a query if a field
(imageURL) in the given document is non empty , I am using edismax so I
know that using bq parameter would solve the problem. However the field
imageURL that I am trying to boost on is not indexed , meaning (stored =
create a unique field, and configure the “dedupe”
> Processor to handle that.
>
>
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 12:02 PM, S.L wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure if this a case of XY problem.
> >
> > I have no control over the URLs to deduce an id from them , those are
> f
, or
try and generate a unique id filed for each document.
For the later option UUID is not behaving as expected in SolrCloud and
_version_ field seems to be serving the need .
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 10:45 PM, S.L wrote:
> > We
is sent to the destination shard, it should be fine.
>
> Have you checked that out? I'm at a conference, so I can't
> check it out too thoroughly right now...
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Here is why I want to do th
er if there's something wonky going on with searching on large longs
> here.
>
> Feels like an XY problem to me though.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:45 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We know that _version_field is a mandatory fi
Hi All,
We know that _version_field is a mandatory field in solrcloud schema.xml,
it is expected to be of type long , it also seems to have unique value in a
collection.
However the query of the form
http://server1.mydomain.com:7344/solr/collection1/select/?q=*:*&fq=%28_version_:14846325489443800
in case of SolrCloud with out
using the uuid type or not having a per replica unique id?
The uuid in question is of type .
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:20 PM, S.L wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> So the issue here is I already have a doctorId
> defined in my schema.xml.
>
> If along with that
d as the key as you feed
> documents in, and you know that the uuid values you’re creating are unique,
> just change the field name and unique key name from ‘id’ to ‘uuid’. Or
> change the key name you send in from ‘uuid’ to ‘id’.
>
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 7:18 PM, S.L simpleliving...@gmail.c
Hi All,
I am seeing interesting behavior on the replicas , I have a single
shard and 6 replicas and on SolrCloud 4.10.1 . I only have a small
number of documents ~375 that are replicated across the six replicas .
The interesting thing is that the same document has a different id in
each one of
, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:18 PM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I previously reported due to no overlap in terms of the documets in the
> SolrCloud replicas of the index shards , I have turned off the replication
> and basically have there shards with a replication factor of 1.
>
> It
Hi All,
As I previously reported due to no overlap in terms of the documets in the
SolrCloud replicas of the index shards , I have turned off the replication
and basically have there shards with a replication factor of 1.
It obviously seems will not be scalable due to the fact that the same core
I am curious , how many shards do you have and whats the replication factor
you are using ?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:27 PM, AJ Lemke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a SOLR cloud instance that has been humming along nicely for
> months.
> Last week we started experiencing missing records.
>
> Admin
d
> if you don't, you then have to make sure to appropriately tune your Hadoop
> implementation to match what your Solr installation is capable of.
>
> On 10/28/14 12:39, S.L wrote:
>
>> Will,
>>
>> I think in one of your other emails(which I am not able to fi
tune your Hadoop
> implementation to match what your Solr installation is capable of.
>
> On 10/28/14 12:39, S.L wrote:
>
>> Will,
>>
>> I think in one of your other emails(which I am not able to find) you has
>> asked if I was indexing directly from MapReduce
hope it doesn't disappear
> altogether.
>
> G'luck
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:25 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Heavy Multi-threaded indexing and SolrCloud 4.10.1
rate of requests from the incoming multiple
threads.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> 2 naïve comments, of course.
>
>
>
> - Queuing theory
>
> - Zookeeper logs.
>
>
>
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: M
Oct 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:40 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > One is not smaller than the other, because the numDocs is same for both
> > "replicas" and essentially they seem to be disjoint s
gest ?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> > > > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > You may simply be overwhelming your cluster
the case?
> > >
> > > Otis
> > > --
> > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:59 PM,
erwhelming your cluster-nodes. Have you checked
> various metrics to see if that is the case?
>
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 2014, a
Folks,
I have posted previously about this , I am using SolrCloud 4.10.1 and have
a sharded collection with 6 nodes , 3 shards and a replication factor of 2.
I am indexing Solr using a Hadoop job , I have 15 Map fetch tasks , that
can each have upto 5 threds each , so the load on the indexing si
lr/home1/dyCollection1_shard2_replica1/data/index.2014101839463;
maxCacheMB=48.0 maxMergeSizeMB=4.0),segFN=segments_88t,generation=10685}
471904907 [RecoveryThread] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – newest
commit generation = 10685
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Shawn,
>
&
Shawn,
Just wondering if you have any other suggestions on what the next steps
whould be ? Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Shawn ,
>
>
>1. I will upgrade to 67 JVM shortly .
>2. This is a new collection as , I was facing a similar issue in 4.7
&g
active",
"core":"dyCollection1_shard3_replica2",
"node_name":"server1.mydomain.com:8082_solr",
"base_url":"http://server1.mydomain.com:8082/solr";,
"leader":"true"},
lusive* , , I did not find even a single common id in
those lists , I tried at least 15 manually ,it looks like to me that the
replicas are disjoint sets.
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 10:24 PM, S.L wrote:
>
>> Yes , I tried those two
I use the select request
handler ,so I cannot replace it with anything else , is that a problem ?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 9:26 PM, S.L wrote:
>
>> Look at the logging information I provided below , looks like the results
>>
anyone please let me know , how to solve this issue of intermittent no
results for a query ?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:15 PM, S.L wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> I have rerun the query by adding shards.info=true and debug= track. I
> have included the xml
rote:
> Try adding shards.info=true and debug=track to your queries ... these will
> give more detailed information about what's going behind the scenes.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:11 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > Erick,
> >
> > I have upgraded to SolrCloud 4.10
true
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Not, I'm not guaranteeing that it'll actually cure the problem, just
> that enough has changed since 4.7 that it'd be a good place to start.
>
> Things have been reported off and on, but they
eed to do to keep these in synch, so
> if you can capture what happened when things got out of synch we'll
> fix it. But a lot has changed in the last several months, so the first
> thing I'd do if possible is to upgrade to 4.10.1.
>
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On
dmin/cloud page.
And let's see your soft and hard commit settings please.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, S.L wrote:
> Eirck,
>
> 0> Load balancer is out of the picture
> .
> 1>When I query with *distrib=false* , I get consistent results as expected
>
ndexing" anyway? How are documents being fed
> to your system?
>
> Best,
> Erick@PuzzledAsWell
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:32 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Erick,
> >
> > I would like to add that the interesting behavior i.e point #2 that I
> > mentioned in m
search
is just failing as whole intermittently .
Also ,the collection is being actively indexed as I query this, could that
be an issue too ?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:24 PM, S.L wrote:
> Erick,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I tried your suggestions.
>
> 1 . When not using
, pointing it at successive
> nodes.
>
> Where is the first place problems show up?
>
> My _guess_ is that your load balancer isn't quite doing what you think, or
> your cluster isn't set up the way you think it is, but those are guesses.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
Hi All,
I am trying to query a 6 node Solr4.7 cluster with 3 shards and a
replication factor of 2 .
I have fronted these 6 Solr nodes using a load balancer , what I notice is
that every time I do a search of the form
q=*:*&fq=(id:9e78c064-919f-4ef3-b236-dc66351b4acf) it gives me a result
only
That makes perfect sense , thanks again!
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 7:08 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Thanks ,load balancer seems to be the preferred solution here , I have a
> > topology where I have 6 Solr nodes that support 3 shards with
client been
zookeeper aware?
Also for indexing ,which is not done from a Python client but is done using
Solrj, I will avoid the load balancers and do the indexing it via the
Zookeeper route.
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 2:29 PM, S.L wr
Right , but my query was to know if there are any Python clients which
achieve the same thing as SolrJ , or the approach one should take when
using Python based clients.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 08:47 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi
Hi All,
We recently moved from a single Solr instance to SolrCloud and we are using
pysolr , I am wondering what options (clients) we have from Python to
take advantage of Zookeeper and load balancing capabilities that SolrCloud
provides if I were to use a smart client like Solrj?
Thanks.
Hi All,
I get "No Live SolrServers available to handle this request" error
intermittently while indexing in a SolrCloud cluster with 3 shards and
replication factor of 2.
I am using Solr 4.7.0.
Please see the stack trace below.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServe
Hello All
If I set fetcher.threads.per.queue property to more than 1 , I believe the
behavior would be to have those many number of threads per host from Nutch, in
that case would Nutch still respect the Crawl-Delay directive in robots.txt and
not crawl at a faster pace that what is specified i
Hi All,
I am using the Direct Spell checker component and I have collate =true in
my solrconfig.xml.
The issue that I noticed is that , when I have a search term with upto two
words in it and if both of them are misspelled I get a collation query as
a suggestion in the spellchecker output, if I
I am not sure if that is doable , I think it needs to be taken care of at
the indexing time.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Gharbi Mohamed <
gharbi.mohamed.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Solr for searching magento products in my project,
> I want to know, is it possible for solr to
race the process if you`re running on Unix or changed
> the
> > log level in Solr to get more information logged
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: June-06-14 2:33 PM
> >
Anyone folks?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:25 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able
> to build up an index in Solr.
>
> But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not able to restart it.The server never
> spits o
Next time always make back up.
> On Jun 4, 2014 7:55 PM, "S.L" wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able
> > to build up an index in Solr.
> >
> > But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not a
Hi Folks,
I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able to
build up an index in Solr.
But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not able to restart it.The server never
spits out the server startup time in seconds in the logs,nor does it print any
error messages in the cata
the exact
> query you are using? How is the spellcheck field analyzed? If you're
> using stemming, then "wrangle" and "wrangler" might be stemmed to the same
> word. (by the way, you shouldn't spellcheck against a stemmed or otherwise
> heavily-analyzed fie
.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > OK, I just realized that "wrangle" is a proper english word, probably
> thats
&g
e of it in the index should'nt
Solr suggest me "wrangler" ?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:00 PM, S.L wrote:
> I do not get any suggestion (when I search for "wrangle") , however I
> correctly get the suggestion wrangler when I search for wranglr , I am
> using the Direc
you’re looking for, or
> is it deemed correctly spelled?
>
> Have you tried another spellChecker impl, for troubleshooting purposes?
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Sat, M
Anyone ?
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:33 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a small test index of 400 documents , it happens to have an entry
> for "wrangler", When I search for "wranglr", I correctly get the collation
> suggestion as "wrangler", h
Hi All,
I have a small test index of 400 documents , it happens to have an entry
for "wrangler", When I search for "wranglr", I correctly get the collation
suggestion as "wrangler", however when I search for "wrangle" , I do not
get a suggestion for "wrangler".
The Levenstien distance between wr
Perhaps someone here will know what the
> problem is.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:36 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
&g
combine or break words in one shot. That is, it cannot
> detect that "mob lie" should become "mobile".
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Satu
Anyone ?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> I am using Solr wordbreak spellchecker and the issue is that when I search
> for a term like "mob ile" expecting that the wordbreak spellchecker would
> actually resutn a suggestion for "mobile" it break
I am using Solr wordbreak spellchecker and the issue is that when I search
for a term like "mob ile" expecting that the wordbreak spellchecker would
actually resutn a suggestion for "mobile" it breaks the search term into
letters like "m o b" I have two issues with this behavior.
1. How can I ma
direction of your question but it is really
> good, secure and flexible to do such kind of things at your client (a java
> client or not). On the other *if *you let people to access your Solr
> instance directly it causes some security issues.
>
> Thanks;
> Furkan KAMACI
>
>
; solve this with Solrj?
>
> Thanks;
> Furkan KAMACI
>
>
> 2014-04-12 18:34 GMT+03:00 S.L :
>
> > Hello fellow Solr users,
> >
> > I am using the default select request handler to search a Solr core , I
> > also use the eDismaxquery parser.
> >
>
Hello fellow Solr users,
I am using the default select request handler to search a Solr core , I
also use the eDismaxquery parser.
1.
I want to integrate this with the spellchecker search component so that
if a search request comes in the spellchecker component also gets called
and I
Hi All,
I want to suggest the correct phrase if a typo is made while searching and
then search it using eDismax parser(pf,pf2,pf3), if no typo is made then
search it using eDismax parser alone.
Is there a way I can combine these two components , I have seen examples
for eDismax and also for Spell
:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Thanks Ahmet, I would definitely look into this . I appreciate that.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> Yes, it has spellcheck.collate parameter. I mean it has lots of
>> parameters and with correct combination of paramete
<
> simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It only works for a single word search term and not multiple word search
> term.
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "William Bell"
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Subject: eDi
t, and
> boost pf3 higher than pf2.
>
> You could try using the complex phrase query parser for the third case.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:08 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
;t make a lot of sense to prematurely focus
> on a solution when you haven't clearly defined your use cases.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:13 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and
ion before the problem is understood.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 6:14 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
>
> Jacks Thanks Again,
>
> I am searching C
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+
> Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
>
> The focus on mm may indeed be a classic "XY Problem" - a premature focus
> on a solution without detailing the problem.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S
t match on the top level of a query.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 2:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am planning to use the eDismax query
Hi All,
I am planning to use the eDismax query parser in SOLR to give boost to
documents that have a phrase in their fields present. Now there is a mm
parameter in the edismax parser query , since the query typed by the user
could be of any length (i.e. >=1) I would like to set the mm value to 1 .
I have a 8GB machine , and I commit for each and every document that is
added to Solr, not sure if I am missing anything here , but it seems I
could use auto commit from your response , in that case do I not need to
call the commit call , can you please point me to a resource that explains
this ?
T
Hi All,
I am running a single Solr instance with version 4.4 with Apache
Tomcat 7.0.42 ,I am aslo running a Nutch instance with about 20
threads and each thread is committing a document in the Solr index
using the Solrj API , the version of Solrj API I
use is 4.3.1 , can anyone please let me know
90 matches
Mail list logo
