Does your feature definitions and the feature names used in the model match?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:17 AM Amjad Khan wrote:
> Yes, I did.
>
> I can see the feature that I created by this
> schema/feature-store/exampleFeatureStore and it return me the features I
> created. But issue is when I
Hi All,
>From the past few months there has been a steady increase in the Solr
response time in our application, yes there are enhancements and index size
increase.
How to approach this issue to find the root cause for this slow and
constant increase? What parameters to check?
Any pointers on thi
Hi Ilay,
I am still on Solr 6.6.0 and did not patch the grouping fix.
I implemented a temporary workaround solution to have 2 async request from
the web application 1st with grouping 2nd without grouping and merged the
results.
This solution worked for my case as we were getting grouping results f
Here is the stacktrace
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Failed to create new
ManagedResource /schema/model-store of type
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore due to:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
org.apache.solr.ltr.model.ModelException: Model type does not exis
Hi Alessandro,
I figured the issue, the model was using a feature which was not in the
features file. The error was very generic so was hard to find this.
Thank you,
Roopa
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Hi Roopa,
> that model changed name few times, which Apach
one to diagnose the
> problem.
>
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:15 PM, spoonerk wrote:
> > Please unsubscribe me. I have tried and tried but still get emails
> >
> > On Mar 9, 2018 10:19 AM, "Roopa Rao" wrote:
> >
> >&
Is there a way to patch the fix to use a external model to Solr 6.6 ?
Thanks,
Roopa
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:30 PM, tapan1707 wrote:
> Could you elaborate a little bit more? Otherwise, I think that you might be
> experiencing the same issue reported in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SO
Thank you, this is exactly what I am facing.
There is a mention of increasing jute.maxbuffer in the Jira I will try that
option.
Thanks,
Roopa
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:30 PM, tapan1707 wrote:
> Could you elaborate a little bit more? Otherwise, I think that you might be
> experiencing the same
what is the way to configure the model size for LTR? We have about 3MB
model and Solr is not holding this model as a ManagedResource.
How can this be configured?
Thanks,
Roopa
Trying to upload a simple MultipleAdditiveTreesModel, however I am getting an
error
"msg":"org.apache.solr.ltr.model.ModelException: Model type does not exist
org.apache.solr.ltr.model.MultipleAdditiveTreesModel"
Root cause seems to be a syntax error in the model file?
I did copy this from the ex
Hi -
There was an error in one of the feature definition in Solr LTR
features.json file and I modified and uploaded it to Solr. I can see that
the definition change is uploaded correctly using the feature store url such
as
http://servername/solr/techproducts/schema/feature-store/myFeatureStore
I
xposed
> directly to the web). In that proxy, the query parameters can be broken
> down and filtered as desired (I examine authorities granted to a session to
> control even which indexes are being searched) before passing the modified
> url to solr. The coding of the proxy obviously
Hi,
I want to enable or disable a SolrFeature in LTR based on efi parameter.
In simple the query should be executed only if a parameter is true.
Any examples or suggestion on how to accomplish this?
Functions queries examples are are using fields to give a value to. In my
case I want to execute
Hi,
Is it possible to specify the synonyms file as a variable, set a default
synonym file and passing the file name from the request? If so, is there an
example of this?
Such as,
Thanks,
Roopa
I see okay, thank you.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> I see,
> According to what I know it is not possible to run for the same field
> different query time analysis.
>
> Not sure if anyone was working on that.
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> -
> ---
> Alessan
can get the synonyms from the analysis chain, however
tokens are individual tokens and not phrases. So, I am stuck at how to
construct a correct query based on the synonym tokens and positions.
Thank you,
Roopa
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> So, I would end up with ~6 c
So, I would end up with ~6 copy fields with ~8 synonym files so that would
be about 48 field/synonym combination. Would that be a significant in terms
of index size. I guess that depends on the thesaurus size, what would be
the best way to measure this?
Custom parser:
This would take the file name
Thank you, Alessandro,
I was trying these options before replying.
Yes, I am looking to generate a score for a query with synonym expansion
(not binary feature)
I can go with the "title" field and have that include the synonyms in
analysis. Only problem is that the number of fields and number of
I am trying to use synonyms expansion as a feature in LTR
Any input on a feature using synonym expansion providing a field and the
synonym file would be helpful.
Thanks,
Roopa
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
LTR
> Merge 1) & 2) in web app.
> Doing a performance test now. Since there are only 10 results for these
> queries and the queries are executed in parallel, I don't foresee any
> problems.
>
> Thanks!
> Roopa
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Roopa Rao
with no grouping + LTR
Merge 1) & 2) in web app.
Doing a performance test now. Since there are only 10 results for these
queries and the queries are executed in parallel, I don't foresee any
problems.
Thanks!
Roopa
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An
Hi,
Any guidance on this would be helpful.
Thank you,
Roopa
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
> Thank you for looking into it further.
> We recently ported over to 6.6 version solely to use LTR feature as it is
> critical for us.
>
> Since
com> wrote:
> Hi Roopa, unfortunately I can't port the patch to the branch_6_6, but
> soon I'll update to upstream. Sorry about that.
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > I merged the code from the bloomberg maste
.
Could you please provide your input if master-solr-8776 is compatible with
branch_6_6?
If this is not the case then how to proceed with using fix in
master-solr-8776 with branch_6_6 can a new patch be created for this?
Thank you,
Roopa
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> Hi Di
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1471.
>
>
> Could you please give your input on how to apply this ticket as a patch for
> branch_6_5 ?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Roopa
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roopa Rao wrote:
>
> > Hi Diego,
> >
> > Thank
file
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1471.
Could you please give your input on how to apply this ticket as a patch for
branch_6_5 ?
Thank you,
Roopa
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roopa Rao wrote:
> Hi Diego,
>
> Thank you, I will
ery.
> I opened a jira item time ago
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776) and I would be happy
> to receive feedback on that. You can find the code here
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/162.
>
> Cheers,
> diego
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:1
Hi,
I am using grouping and LTR together and the results are not getting
re-rank as it does without grouping.
I am passing &rq parameter.
Does LTR work with grouping on?
Solr version 6.5
Thank you,
Roopa
28 matches
Mail list logo
