solr.request.SolrRequestHandler
On 6/24/2020 1:59 PM, Peter van de Kerk wrote:
> So I copied files from C:\solr-8.5.2\dist to C:\solr-8.5.2\server\lib
>
> But then I get error
>
>> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.
I'm migrating from solr v4.3.1 to v8.5.2 and using this guide:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/installing-solr.html
I can't get data-import handler to work. I wanted to create a new core and then
copy my old data-config fields into it to get me a quick start.
1. I ran command `solr crea
ments" should be "content"?
Secondly, in the Json example it says:
"The labelled relationship here is one child document but could have
been wrapped in array brackets."
However in the actual Json, the parent document (ID=1) with a labelled
relationship has two child documents (IDs 2 and 3), and they are
already in array brackets.
Is the documentation wrong or have I misunderstood it?
Thanks,
Peter
You can delete documents in SolrJ by using deleteByQuery. Using this you can
delete any number of documents from your index or all your documents depending
on the query you specify as the parameter. How you use it is down to your
application.
You haven't said if your application performs a full
Hi Oleksandr,
Thanks very much for help. Yes that jira looks like exactly our problem.
I'll give that a go tomorrow.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Oleksandr Drapushko [mailto:drapus...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 October 2019 19:52
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [EXT
commit. I'm
guessing that whatever is making the single document addition so inefficient is
also affecting the performance of our live solr cloud and contributing to the
100% cpu usage that we observe when adding new documents. Any help, advice or
insight would be appreciat
RPMs
for Java 11 (or 12/13) on CentOS.
Peter
On 12/10/2019 5:30 am, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 10/10/2019 11:01 PM, Peter Davie wrote:
I have just installed Solr 8.2.0 on CentOS 7.7.1908. Java version
is as follows:
openjdk version "11.0.4" 2019-07-16 LTS
Hi,
I have created the bug report in Jira and attached the patch to it.
Kind Regards,
Peter
On 12/10/2019 2:34 am, Joel Bernstein wrote:
This sounds like a great patch. I can help with the review and commit after
the jira is created.
Thanks!
Joel
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:06 AM Peter
dsPerNode=-1&collection.configName=test&name=test&action=CREATE&numShards=1&wt=json}
status=400 QTime=6001
2019-10-11 04:46:04.494 INFO
(OverseerCollectionConfigSetProcessor-72057977101680640-192.168.1.33:8983_solr-n_00)
[ ] o.a.s.c.OverseerTaskQueue Response ZK path:
/overseer/collection-queue-work/qnr-00 doesn't exist. Requestor
may have disconnected from ZooKeeper
2019-10-11 04:46:28.539 INFO (qtp195801026-22) [ ]
o.a.s.s.HttpSolrCall [admin] webapp=null path=/admin/metrics
params={wt=javabin&version=2&key=solr.jvm:os.processCpuLoad&key=solr.node:CONTAINER.fs.coreRoot.usableSpace&key=solr.jvm:os.systemLoadAverage&key=solr.jvm:memory.heap.used}
status=0 QTime=15
Any thoughts/suggestions?
Kind Regards,
Peter
cted":true,
"status":0,
"QTime":260,
"params":{
"q":"*:*",
"distrib":"false",
"positiveLabel":"1",
"field":"body",
"numTerms":"300",
"fq":["category:BUSINESS",
"role:train",
"{!igain}"],
"version":"2",
"wt":"json",
"outcome":"positive",
"_":"1569983546342"}},
"featuredTerms":[
"3",-0.0173133558644304,
"authority",-0.0173133558644304,
"brand",-0.0173133558644304,
"commission",-0.0173133558644304,
"compared",-0.0173133558644304,
"condition",-0.0173133558644304,
"continuing",-0.0173133558644304,
"deficit",-0.0173133558644304,
"expectation",-0.0173133558644304,
To my (admittedly inexpert) eye, it seems like this is producing more
reasonable results.
With this change in place, train() now produces:
"idfs_ds": [
0.6212826193303013,
0.6434237452075148,
0.7169578292536639,
0.741349282377823,
0.86843471069652,
1.0140549006400466,
1.0639267306802198,
1.0753554265038423,...
|"terms_ss": [ "â", "company", "market", "firm", "month", "analyst",
"chief", "time",|||...| I am not sure if I have missed anything, but this seems like it's
producing better outcomes. I would appreciate any input on whether I
have missed anything here before I proceed further (JIRA and submit a
patch). Kind Regards, Peter |
ot;score_d": 0.24253562092781067,
"id": "0003b45b-aab9-4635-8f93-903c6f492355"
},
{
"probability_d": 0.7310585786300049,
"score_d": 0.2773500978946686,
"id": "0008ecb1-3add-4ef5-85e1-736bf37a834b"
},
etc.
]}
}
Can anyone point out what am I doing wrong?
Peter
src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/de/GermanStemmer.java#L164
[2]
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/lucene/analysis/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/de/GermanNormalizationFilter.java#L31
-Original Message-
From: Doris Peter
Sent: Freitag, 19. Juli 2019 11:13
To
quot;
There seems to be nothing like this mapping file in the ICUFoldingFilter?
Exclusion is not enough
>>> Shawn Heisey 7/18/2019 3:08 PM >>>
On 7/18/2019 3:01 AM, Doris Peter wrote:
> So, the mappingCharFilter seems to be executed at first, no matter which
> pos
Hi,
another problem with the stemming:
Most of our texts are in German, so we use the GermanStemFilterFactory. But we
also use MappingCharFilterFactory where we map for example ä->ae.
But of course we want the stemming to turn for example 'häuser' into 'haus',
which the GermanStemFilterFactor
Hi, we have got some problems with the stemming of our ocr-texts:
We use the following configuration for our full-text-ocr field:
Now it seems, the StemFilter and wildcard queries don't work together.
When I search for
after it
in the index config
2> It is usually unnecessary to have the exact same parameters at both query
and index time for WDGFF. If you’ve split parts up at index time then mashed
them all back together, you can usually only split them up at query time.
3> try adding &debug=query to
other non-word characters, like ' or , for
example.
The strange thing about it is, that the Solr Analysis-Tool reports
a match for the first version, but when we send a Solr Query, we get no
result Documents.
Has anyone got an idea, what this could be?
Thank you very much in advance,
Doris Peter
ation.
Thanks again for your help.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley [mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 December 2018 04:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geofilt and distance measurement problems using
SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType field
erformance isn't good enough with radius.
Just wondering if there's something else wrong with our set up which is causing
this behaviour for rpt fields.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley [mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 December 2018 04:44
To: sol
Hi Tanya,
I think can have a stop filter applied to the query for your field type.
...
You should be aable to use the length filter for the second part of your
question.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Bompi [mailto:tanya.bo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13
ay or is the
SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType not suitable for doing radius searches on
points in this way?
Thanks in anticipation for any suggestions.
Peter Lancaster.
This message is confidential and may contain privileged information. You should
not di
hanks,
Peter
Peter Tyrrell, MLIS
Lead Developer at Andornot
1-866-266-2525 x706 / ptyrr...@andornot.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tyrrell
Sent: September 14, 2018 3:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Faceting with EnumFieldType in 7.1
Yes.
Peter Tyrrell, MLIS
Yes.
Peter Tyrrell, MLIS
Lead Developer at Andornot
1-866-266-2525 x706 / ptyrr...@andornot.com
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: September 13, 2018 8:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Faceting with EnumFieldType in 7.1
Was the document re-indexed in
acet.field=gradeLevel_enum&facet=on&fl=id,gradeLevel_enum&q=*:*&wt=json
Thanks for any insight.
Peter Tyrrell, MLIS
Lead Developer at Andornot
1-866-266-2525 x706 / ptyrr...@andornot.com<mailto:ptyrr...@andornot.com>
Right you are. I hadn't been known it during index-time
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:43 PM Erik Hatcher wrote:
> this is best done at index-time. (it seems like you're trying to avoid
> doing that though)
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 2018, at 5:36 AM, Peter Sh wrote:
>
I want to be able to parse "KEY:VALUE" pairs from my text and have a facet
representing distribution of VALUES
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:25 PM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Neither fl nor facet.field support functions, but facet.query is analogous
> to the latter. I do not understand what y
Can I use it in "fl" and "facet.field" as a function
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:33 AM Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The usual faceting works for all queries, facet.query=q:field:/[a-z]+$/
> will probably work too, i would be really surprised if it didn't. Keep in
> mind that my example does
can it be used in facets?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 11:24 Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is not really obvious in documentation, but the standard query parser
> supports regular expressions. Encapsulate your regex with forward slashes
> /, q=field:/[a-z]+$/ will work.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
>
I've got collection with a string or text field storing free-text. I'd like
to use some RexEx function looking for patterns like "KEY:VALUE" from the
text and use it for filtering and faceting.
Hi Arunan,
You can use a context filter query as described
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/suggester.html
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Arunan Sugunakumar [mailto:arunans...@cse.mrt.ac.lk]
Sent: 03 July 2018 12:17
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Filtering
collections
Best Regards
Peter Gylling Jørgensen
Findability Consultant
Mail: peter.jorgen...@findwise.com<mailto:peter.jorgen...@findwise.com>
Mobile: +45 42442890
Den 26. jun. 2018 kl. 13.55 skrev angeladdati
mailto:angeladd...@gmail.com>>:
Hi:
I have two sources to indexi
want to work if you simply use on both index and query.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Paul, Lulu [mailto:lulu.p...@bl.uk]
Sent: 29 March 2018 12:03
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Query redg : diacritics in keyword search
Hi,
The keyword search Carré returns values
Hi Raunak,
Are you using a stop word file? That might be why you're getting 0 results
searching for "OR".
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: RAUNAK AGRAWAL [mailto:agrawal.rau...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 March 2018 07:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to e
Hi!
I'm still pretty new to Solr and I want to use the vector Scoring plugin (
https://github.com/saaay71/solr-vector-scoring/network) but unfortunately,
it does not seem to work for newer Solr versions.
I tested it with 6.6 to verify its functionality, so it seems to be broken
because of the upg
one please confirm if Solr 7 authentication does/doesn't support
distributed/sharded searches?
Many thanks,
Peter
dmin/CollectionAdmin/Configset etc.
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/25/2018 1:28 PM, Peter Sturge wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if 7.2.1 solrj had native support for the
>> security/authentication endpoint? I couldn't find anything in
well documented).
Thanks,
Peter
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I managed to get it working by specifying it in the requestHandler /select
section in solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
AND
Your other suggestions will be also useful for everyone with a similar
question. Thanks!
Peter
On Wed, Feb
fying a default q.op parameter? Really
don't want to have to include it in *every* query, that kinda defeats its
purpose...
Thanks,
Peter
Shouldn't the query just be something like title: "to order this report" and
then it will work.
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeet Kumar [mailto:sanjeetkumar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 January 2018 06:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Got unexpected results.
Hi,
I am using Solr-6.4
Hi,
We'be been using JPRofiler (www.ej-technologies.com) for years now.
Without a doubt, the most comprehensive and useful profiler for java.
Works very well, supports remote profiling and includes some very neat heap
walking/gc profiling.
Peter
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Walter Unde
Hi Ruby,
The documentation says that threshold is available for the
HighFrequencyDictionaryFactory implementation. Since you're using
DocumentDictionaryFactory I guess it will be ignored.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: ruby [mailto:rshoss...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 November
heers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: ruby [mailto:rshoss...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 November 2017 19:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Phrase suggester - field limit and order
I'm using the BlendedInfixLookupFactory to get phrase suggestions. It returns
the entire field content.
Hello all,
Is it possible to highlight the results of subqueries?
Thanks,
-Peter
--
Peter Eichman
Senior Software Developer
University of Maryland Libraries
peich...@umd.edu
quot;field2" then use "field2:[1 TO 100];
but if there is no "field2", then use "field3:[1 TO 100].
Something like:
?q=*:*&fq=if(exists(field1),field1:[1 TO 100],if(exists(field2),field2:[1 TO
100], field3:[1 TO 100]))
But is this does not work.
Is it even possible?
Thanks,
Peter
I am looking for lessons learned or problems seen when building a Solr index
from AEM using a Solr cluster with content passing through an ELB.
Our configuration is AEM 6.1 indexing to a cluster of Solr servers running
version 4.7.1. When building an index with a smaller data set - 4 million
it
s far as I know you've been able to have different similarities per field in
solr for a while now. https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Similarity
Cheers,
Peter Lancaster.
-Original Message-
From: Webster Homer [mailto:webster.ho...@sial.com]
Sent: 08 August 2017 20:39
To:
hen I ingest data I don't see data appearing on the follower in the log.
It really seems like the data isn't being sent from the leader. As I said it
could easily be something stupid that I've done along the way but I can't see
what it is.
Thanks again,
Peter.
-Original
page
together.
However, when we add highlighting, only the main document in each collapsed
set has highlighted snippets in the "highlighting" section of the response.
Is there a way to tell Solr to use the full result set, and not the
collapsed one, when highlighting?
Thanks.
-Peter
like Solr, it's easier to
accidentally 'let it run free'. If you're using Solr for db rather than
search, you will need a secure front-end.
Joy and good will to all, regardless of what tool you choose!
Peter
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I read t
document has a field
"price_owner_float" then use that, otherwise use the field
"price_customer_float").
This gives a syntax error:
fq=if(exists(price_owner_float),price_owner_float,price_customer_float):[100 TO
200]
Thanks,
Peter
I need to improve user experience on facets calculation.
Let’s assume we’ve got a time partitioned collections.
Partition1, Partition2, Partition3 …..
AliasAllPartitions unify all partitions together.
Running facets on AliasAllPartitions is very heavy synchronous operation,
user have to wait a lot
should
have been more.
Thanks,
-Peter
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/14/2017 9:57 AM, Peter Matthew Eichman wrote:
> > I am running Solr 6.4.0, and while I am attempting to index my Fedora
> > 4 data, I keep getting warning messages in my
, are you sure its
> present?
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Peter Matthew Eichman
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am running Solr 6.4.0, and while I am attempting to index my Fedora 4
> > data, I keep getting warning messages i
l.java:589)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Thanks,
-Peter
--
Peter Eichman
Senior Software Developer
University of Maryland Libraries
peich...@umd.edu
hi all:
I was using solr 3.6 and tried to solve a recall-problem today , but
encountered a weird problem.
There's doc with field value : 均匀肤色, (just treated that word as a symbol
if you don't know it, I just want to describe the problem as exact as
possible).
And below was the analysis
Thanks, we will look into the feasibility of a Solr upgrade. If not, is
there anything in 4.10 that would allow us to do something similar, or
would we be stuck with denormalizing our data at index time?
-Peter
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> https://issues.apache.
Hi Mikhail,
I've turned on DEBUG level logging, but I still only see the main request
logged, and no requests for the subqueries.
Could it be a version issue? We are running Solr 4.10.
Thanks,
-Peter
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Peter,
> Subquery shou
"https://fcrepolocal/fcrepo/rest/pcdm/8a/d9/c7/62/8ad9c762-4391-428d-b1ad-be5ac3e06c42";
]
}
]
}
}
Is $row.pcdm_members the right way to refer to the pcdm_members field
of the current document in the subquery? Is the multivalued nature of
the field a problem? I have t
ot;members.q": "{!terms f=id v=$row.pcdm_members}",
"wt": "json",
"_": "1483641932207"
}
},
"response": {
"numFound": 1,
"start": 0,
"docs": [
{}
]
}
}
Any pointers on what I am missing? Are there any configuration settings in
solrconfig.xml that I need to be aware of for subqueries to work?
Thanks,
-Peter
--
Peter Eichman
Senior Software Developer
University of Maryland Libraries
peich...@umd.edu
t seem to matter,
but now it certainly does. thx :)
--
CUL8R, Peter.
www.desk.nl
Your excuse is: It is a layer 8 problem
seems solr tries to use the datasource named "web" (the BinURLDataSource)
instead of the configured "db" datasource (the JdbcDataSource). am I doing
something wrong, or is this a bug ?
--
CUL8R, Peter.
www.desk.nl
Your excuse is: Communist revolutionaries taking over the ser
I've got an exception below running
curl --data-urlencode
'expr=search(EventsAndDCF,q="*:*",fl="AccessPath",sort="AccessPath
asc",qt="/export")' "http://localhost:8983/solr/EventsAndDCF/stream";
Solr responce:
{"result-set":{"docs":[
{"EXCEPTION":null,"EOF":true}]}}
My collection EventsAndDCF exi
first time Apache makes
the slightest change to the structure of the spell check index.
If anyone has any insights to offer I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
Peter S. Lee
int, since I have not seen any
documentation nor configuration settings for this feature, I am ready to take
it as truth that Solr does NOT include this functionality. However, I thought I
should ask the mailing list to see if I've missed something.
Thank you!
Peter S. Lee, Software Enginee
ookeeper nodes, then yes, you should
> have HA.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 05:48 PM, Peter Tan wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> > Appreciate you helping me to clear this up.
> >
> > For replicationFactor = 1, that means only keeping one copy of
, correct?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> There is no HA with a single replica for each shard. Replication factor
> must be at least 2 for HA.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Peter Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi Jack, What hap
Hi Jack, What happens when there is only one replica setup?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Solr Cloud provides HA when you configure at least two replicas for each
> shard and have at least 3 zookeepers. That's it. No deck or detail document
> is needed.
>
>
>
> -- Jack
Great - can't wait to try this out! Many thanks for your help on pointing
me towards this new faceting feature.
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It will not be an impediment, if you have a flat docume
ould be
an impediment to nested facets, but I don't know enough about them to know
for sure.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mmm let's say that nested facets are a subset of Pivot Facets.
> if pivot face
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
I did have a look at pivots, and they could work in a way. We're still on
Solr 4.3, so I'll have to wait for sub-facets - but they sure look pretty
cool!
Peter
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> w
e values for
'users' are in which group. If the number of doc hits is very large (can
easily be in the 100's of thousands) it's not practical to iterate through
the docs looking for unique values.
This Use Case necessitates the unique values within each group, rather than
the total doc hits.
Is this possible with grouping, or inconjunction with another module?
Many thanks,
+Peter
e values for
'users' are in which group. If the number of doc hits is very large (can
easily be in the 100's of thousands) it's not practical to iterate through
the docs looking for unique values.
This Use Case necessitates the unique values within each group, rather than
the total doc hits.
Is this possible with grouping, or inconjunction with another module?
Many thanks,
+Peter
he same shard. The typical approach for this is to use
> composite Id routing to ensure that documents with the same collapse
> field land on the same shard.
>
> We should make this clear in the documentation.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Mon,
>From my reading of the solr docs (e.g.
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
>and https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping), I've
>been under the impression that these two methods (result grouping and
>collapsing query parser) can
ies file as described in:
http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.2.7.v20150116/configuring-logging.html
.
A 404 would suggest that Solr hasn't loaded, possibly due to missing
mappings in the xml. You can run netstat -a on your Windows box to see if
Solr is listening on port 8983.
Thanks,
P
nt in webdefault.xml - this tells jetty which apps are using
which realms:
A web application name
/*
default-role
Your realm.properties should then have user account entries for the role
similar to:
admin: some-cred, default-role
Hope this helps,
Peter
O
Try adding the "start" call in your jetty.xml:
Realm Name
/etc/realm.properties
5
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, O. Klein wrote:
> Yeah I can't get it to work on Jetty 9 either on Linux.
>
> Just trying to password protect the admin pages.
>
>
izing
Solr to receive credentials and use them for authentication to remote
instances - SOLR-1861 is an old implementation for a previous release, and
there has been some significant refactoring of SearchHandler since then,
but the concept works well for distributed queries.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Ju
eads obviously to
Invalid path string
\"/configs/newspapers//netapp/dokubase/seeval/dicts/stopwords/stopwords_de.txt\"
caused by empty node name specified @20"
Is there any way to prevent Zookeeper from doing so?
Thanks in advance,
best regards
Peter
Hello,
Thinking to combine the output provided from the IndexBasedSpellChecker
with the language rules from the languagetool(languagetool.org).
Wondering if this is already implemented ?
Thanks,
Peter
SHARD doesn't seem ideal. If a shard reaches a
> certain
> > size, it would be better for us to simply add an extra shard, without
> > splitting.
> >
>
> True, and you can do this if you take explicit control of the document
> routing, but...
> that's quite t
Yes, totally agree. We run 500m+ docs in a (non-cloud) Solr4, and it even
performs reasonably well on commodity hardware with lots of faceting and
concurrent indexing! Ok, you need a lot of RAM to keep faceting happy, but
it works.
++1 for the automagic shard creator. We've been looking into doing
> As of 4.10, commits/optimize etc are executed in parallel.
Excellent - thanks.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Peter Keegan
> wrote:
> >
> > > A distributed up
tPan.534d8d6d.74b0dc51.13a79@airmetal.local%3E
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Peter Keegan
> wrote:
> >
> > If a timeout occurs, does the distributed update then go to the next
>
uests only. The socket and
> connection timeout inside the shardHandlerFactory section apply for
> inter-shard search requests.
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Peter Keegan
> wrote:
>
> > Btw, are the following timeouts still supported in solr.xml, and do th
27; actions did result
in an orderly shutdown of the replica which caused the Solr-leader to get
an exception and update the live_nodes, gracefully.
So now, the timeouts should only play a backup role.
Thanks for the help,
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
>
auto
scaling shutdown is that you can't log into the 'vanishing machine' to view
the logs.
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
>
> : No, I wasn't aware of these. I will give that a try. If I stop the Solr
> : jetty service manually, things r
ZK version 3.4.5 and Solr 4.6.1
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, that should solve the hung threads on the leader.
>
> When you stop the jetty service then it is a graceful shutdown where
> existing req
Btw, are the following timeouts still supported in solr.xml, and do they
only apply to distributed search?
${socketTimeout:0}
${connTimeout:0}
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Peter Keegan
wrote:
> No, I wasn't aware of these. I will give that a try. If I
sion, but the Solr
leader never gets notified. This seems like a bug in ZK.
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you have distribUpdateConnTimeout and distribUpdateSoTimeout set to
> reasonable values in your solr
threads are waiting on a response from the
terminated replicas, but I would have expected an IOException to occur. Any
ideas on what may be happening?
Thanks,
Peter
ed' issue. To
filter Terms would, in the worst case, mean looking up a great many items.
For now, I'm going with the TermsComponent added to the standard
searchhandler. The drawback is you get back all terms that match the
terms.regex, even those not necessarily in the results.
Many thanks,
P
t these back as facets, but getting them back at all
would be great.
Is it possible to have the query return which term(s) from 'raw' actually
matched the value in 'action'?
Maybe an extended TermsComponent to add only matched terms to the response
payload or similar?
Many thanks,
Peter
Hi
Is it possible to formulate a Solr query which finds all documents which have
the same value in a particular field?
Note, I don't know what the value is, I just want to find all documents with
duplicate values.
For example, I have 5 documents:
Doc1: field Name = Peter
Doc2: field
For anyone looking to do this sort of facet intersecting, here's my query:
127.0.0.1:8983/solr/net/select?q=*:*&fl=dest&fl=src&facet=true&fq={!join
from=addr to=dest
fromIndex=targets}*&facet.field=src&facet.field=dest&facet.mincount=1&facet.limit=-1&facet
ess it's like taking two
facet lists (1 for addr, 1 for dest), intersecting them and returning the
result:
List 1:
a
b
c
d
e
f
List 2:
a
a
g
z
c
c
c
e
Resultant intersection:
a (2)
c (3)
e (1)
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Peter Sturge [pe
need the documents themselves, only the list of
unique values that are the intersection of 'dest' and 'addr'.
Can anyone help shed some light on how best to do this?
Many thanks,
Peter
I'm seeing 9X throughput with 1000 docs/batch vs 1 doc/batch, with a single
thread, so it's certainly worth it.
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> And Walter has also been around for a _long_ time ;)
>
> (sorry, couldn't resist)
&
over it.
Peter
1 - 100 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
