Hi all,
The way the indexing works on our system is as follows:
We have a separate "staging" server with a copy of our web app. The
clients will index a number of documents in a batch on the staging
server (this happens about once a week), then they play with the results
on the staging server
This is similar to a problem I've been having. It's pretty easy to just
limit the user to 200 pages when the results are sorted by relevance,
but if they are sorted alphabetically, then that doesn't work. It would
be nice if there were a "limit=2000" parameter to the solr call that is
applied t
Is there, or will there be, a screencast of this available?
I'm sorry to have missed it.
Tom Hill wrote:
In this introductory technical presentation, renowned search expert Mark
Bennett, CTO of Search Consultancy New Idea Engineering,
will present practical tips and examples to help you quickl
I'm not sure if this is what you mean, but we do all our indexing on a
non-public server so we can test it. Only when everyone is satisfied do
we put it on the public server.
To do that we just tar up the "index" folder and scp it to the server.
To install it, we stop solr, untar it, and start
her wrote:
Paul,
Inline below...
On Nov 9, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Paul Rosen wrote:
If I could just create the desired URL, I can probably work backwards
and construct the correct ruby call.
Right, this list will always serve you best if you take the Ruby out of
the equation. solr-ruby, while cool
that matters.
I'd like the search to put all of the objects that contain genre
"Citation" below the 10 objects that do not contain that genre.
I've read the various pages on boosting, but since I'm not actively
searching on the field that I want to put a boost value on
find that the text matched was later in the doc.
Jake
-Original Message-
From: Paul Rosen [mailto:p...@performantsoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 4:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why doesn't highlighting work on this document?
I have a puzzling case t
Are there any pitfalls to storing an arbitrary text file in the same
directory as the solr index?
We're slinging different versions of the index around while we're
testing and it's hard to keep them straight.
I'd like to put a readme.txt file in the directory that contains some
history about
Is there any difference to the relevancy score for a document that has
been added directly to an index vs. the same document that got into the
index because of a merge?
In other words, I'd like to build my index in pieces (since people in
different cities will be working on parts of it), but I
tor]
hash[:df] = @params[:default_field]
Does this make sense? Should this be changed in the next version of the
solr-ruby gem?
Paul Rosen wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using solr-ruby 0.0.7 and am having trouble getting Sort to work.
I have the following statement:
req = Solr::Request::St
gardless of the method).
You can get the old behavior bt adding either of the parameters
"facet.method=enum" or "f.content.facet.method=enum"
We'll add something to the release notes.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Paul Rosen wrot
(using solr 1.4 nightly; solr-ruby 0.0.7)
I am attempting to do an auto-complete with the following statement:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(
:start => 0, :rows => 0, :shards => [ 'resources', 'exhibits'],
:query => "*:*", :filter_queries => [ ],
:facets => {:fields => [ "content" ], :min
Hi all,
I'm using solr-ruby 0.0.7 and am having trouble getting Sort to work.
I have the following statement:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(:start => start, :rows => max,
:sort => [ :title_sort => :ascending ],
:query => query, :filter_queries => filter_queries,
:field_list => @field_lis
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
The path on the wiki page was wrong. You need to use the adminPath in the
url. Look at the adminPath attribute in solr.xml. It is typically
/admin/cores
So the correct path for you would be:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=mergeindexes&core=merged&ind
Hi,
I've been trying to experiment with merging, but have been running into
some problems.
First, I'm using ruby and the solr-ruby-0.0.7 gem. It looks like there
is no support in that gem for merging. Have I overlooked something?
Second, I was attempting to just follow the instructions in
ldAliasesAndGlobsInParams
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Paul Rosen wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to request all fields in an object EXCEPT a particular one?
In other words, the following pseudo code is what I'd like to express:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(:start => page*size,
Hi,
Is there a way to request all fields in an object EXCEPT a particular
one? In other words, the following pseudo code is what I'd like to express:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(:start => page*size, :rows => size,
:query => my_query, :field_list => [ ALL EXCEPT 'text' ])
Is there a way
Sorry for the long delay in responding, but I've just gotten back to
this problem...
I got the solr 1.4 nightly and the problem went away, so I guess it is a
solr 1.3 bug.
Thanks for all the input!
Lance Norskog wrote:
Paul, can you create an HTTP url that does this exact query? With
multip
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
I've done a few experiments with searching two cores with the same schema
using the shard syntax. (using solr 1.3)
My use case is that I want to have multiple cores because a few different
people will be man
Hi,
I've done a few experiments with searching two cores with the same
schema using the shard syntax. (using solr 1.3)
My use case is that I want to have multiple cores because a few
different people will be managing the indexing, and that will happen at
different times. The data, however, i
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
Hi again,
I've mostly gotten the multicore working except for one detail.
(I'm using solr 1.3 and solr-ruby 0.0.6 in a rails project.)
I've done a few queries and I appear to be able to get hits f
Hi again,
I've mostly gotten the multicore working except for one detail.
(I'm using solr 1.3 and solr-ruby 0.0.6 in a rails project.)
I've done a few queries and I appear to be able to get hits from either
core. (yeah!)
I'm forming my request like this:
req = Solr::Request::Standard.new(
2009 at 1:57 AM, Paul Rosen wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to set up solr 1.3 to use multicore but I'm getting some puzzling
results. My solr.xml file is:
When I start up solr, everything looks normal until I get this line in the
log:
INFO: [resources] Opening new SolrCo
Hi All,
I'm trying to set up solr 1.3 to use multicore but I'm getting some
puzzling results. My solr.xml file is:
dataDir="solr/resources/data/" />
dataDir="solr/exhibits/data/" />
dataDir="solr/reindex_resources/data/" />
When I start up solr, everything looks normal until I g
lhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1')
because it has a "?" in it.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
With solr-ruby, simply put the core name in the URL of the
Solr::Connection...
solr = Solr::Connection.new('http://localhost:8983/solr/core_name')
Erik
On Sep 9,
Hi Matt,
What kinds of things were you hoping to find when looking for multicore
support in either solr-ruby or rsolr?
I have a couple of uses for it:
1) Search and merge the results from multiple indexes:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:898
Hi all,
I'd like to start experimenting with multicore in a ruby on rails app.
Right now, the app is using the solr-ruby-rails-0.0.5 to communicate
with solr and it doesn't appear to have direct support for multicore and
I didn't have any luck googling around for it.
We aren't necessarily we
That sounds very similar to my use case, too. (Mentioned in the recent
thread "Updating a solr record"). So +1 on allowing updates!
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Don,
I started work on fixing this a while back. However I plan to
resume again soon. Basically one would be able to update fields
to a pa
Hi Eric,
I think I understand what you are saying but I'm not sure how it would work.
I think you are saying to have two different indexes, each one has the
same documents, but one has the hard-to-get fields and the other has the
easy-to-get fields. Then I would make the same query twice, once
solr because I just can't create the
record the same way as I originally did.
(Besides the time involved in crawling all those websites, some of them
only allow us access for a limited amount of time, so to reindex, we
need to call them up and schedule a time for them to whitelist us.)
I realize there is no way to update particular fields in a solr record.
I know the recommendation is to delete the record from the index and
re-add it, but in my case, it is difficult to completely reindex, so
that creates problems with my work flow.
That is, the info that I use to create a so
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Paul Rosen wrote:
You can see the problem here (at least until it's fixed!):
http://nines.performantsoftware.com/search/saved?user=paul&name=poem
Hi Paul - that project looks familiar! :)
Hi Erik! I should hope so! And I'
I'm trying to sort, but I am not always getting the correct results and
I'm not sure where to start tracking down the problem.
You can see the problem here (at least until it's fixed!):
http://nines.performantsoftware.com/search/saved?user=paul&name=poem
If you sort by Title/Ascending, you ge
33 matches
Mail list logo
