won't this replace *all* 0s ? ie, 1024 will become 124 ?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"The only people that never change are the stupid and the dead"
Jorge Luis Borges.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers ma
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:20:37 -0400
Joel Nylund wrote:
> Well I tried removing those 2 letters from stopwords, didnt seem to
> help, I also tried changing the field type to "text_ws", didnt seem to
> work. Any other ideas?
Hi Joel,
if your stop word filter was applied on index, you will have
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:15:44 -0700
"Robert Petersen" wrote:
> Thanks all, I figured there would be more talk about daemontools if there
> were really a need. I appreciate the input and for starters we'll put two
> slaves behind a load balancer and grow it from there.
>
Robert,
not taking away f
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 22:16:04 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> I have the following "curl" cmd to update and doing commit to Solr ( I have
> 10 xml files just for testing)
[...]
hello,
DIH supports XML, right?
not sure if it works with n files...but it's worth looking at it.
alternatively, u ca
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:54:07 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
[...]
> much on our setup.
>
> Like said we have file name "test.xml" which come from SQL output , we put it
> locally on the solr server under "/opt/test.xml"
>
> So, I need to execute the commands from solr system to add and update this to
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:56:03 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
> Norberto,
>
> Thanks, I think my questions is:
>
> >>why not generate your SQL output directly into your oracle server as a file
>
> What type of file is this?
>
>
a file in a format that you can then import into SOLR.
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:28:16 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
[...]>
> >upload the file to your SOLR server? Then the data file is local to your SOLR
> >server , you will bypass any WAN and firewall you may be having. (or some
> >variation of it, sql -> SOLR server as file, etc..)
>
> How we upload th
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:36:35 +0200
Marcus Herou wrote:
> Sharing some of our exports from DB to solr. Note: many of the statements
> below might not work due to clip-clip.
thx Marcus - but that's a DIH config right? :)
b
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"I respect faith,
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:02:28 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
> Norberto, Thanks for your input.
>
> What do you mean with "Have you tried connecting to SOLR over HTTP from
> localhost, therefore avoiding any firewall issues and network latency ? it
> should work a LOT faster than from a remote site."
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:28:51 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
> Norberto,
>
Hi Francis,
Please reply to the list, or keep it in CC.
> You saying:
>
> "Other alternatives are to transform the XML into csv and import it that way"
>
> How do you transfer that CSV file to Solr?
>
http://wiki.apache
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:12:58 +0800
James liu wrote:
> I use solr to search and index is made by lucene. (not
> EmbeddedSolrServer(wiki is old))
>
> Is it problem when i use solr to search?
>
> which the difference between Index(made by lucene and solr)?
Hi James,
make sure the version of Lucene
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:07:12 -0700
Francis Yakin wrote:
>
> We have several thousands of xml files in database that we load it to solr
> master The Database uses "http" connection and transfer those files to solr
> master. Solr then translate xml files to their lindex.
>
> We are experiencing
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:10:59 +0100
Ben wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> I'm not sure exactly how much context you need here, so I'll try to keep
> it short and expand as needed.
>
> The column I am faceting contains a comma deliniated set of vectors.
> Each vector is made up of {Make,Year,Model} e.g.
>
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
pof wrote:
>
> Hi, I am wanting to add document-level security that works as following: An
> external process makes a query to the index, depending on their security
> allowences based of a login id a list of hits are returned minus any the
> user are mea
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Perhaps an easier alternative is to index not the MS-Outlook files
> themselves, but email messages pulled from the IMAP or POP servers, if that's
> where the original emails live.
PST files ('outlook files') are local to the end
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:08:03 +1100
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We didn't notice any severe performance hit but :
> - data set isn't huge ( ca 1 MM docs).
> - reindexed nightly via DIH from MS-SQL, so we can use a separate cache layer
> to lower the
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:31:39 -0500
"Burton-West, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The approach to this problem used by Nutch looks promising. Has anyone
> ported the Nutch CommonGrams filter to Solr?
>
> "Construct n-grams for frequently occuring terms and phrases while
> indexing. Optimize phr
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:59:31 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > would it be faster to say q=user: AND highestuid:[ * TO *] ?
>
> Now that I read again what fq really did, yes, sounds like you're right.
you may want to compare them both to see which one is better... I just went
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:21:17 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I gave enough reasons above for why I don't like this
> solution. :) I also don't like adding new shared global state databases
> just for Solr. Solr should be the one shared global state database..
fair enough
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:02:16 +0200
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Timo,
>
[...]
> The main problem is that before doing the search, I first have to check
> if there are any unindexed messages and then add them to Solr. This is
> done using a query like:
> - fl=uid
> - rows
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:59:50 -0500
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please submit your preferences for the solr logo.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394267/apache_solr_c_blue.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394263/apache_solr_a_blue.jpg
https:/
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:58:52 -0800 (PST)
RaghavPrabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Im using multiple cores and all i need to do is,to make the each core in
> secure manner. If i am accessing the particular core via url,it should ask
> and validate the credentials say Username & Password for each
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:26:02 +0100
"Aleksander M. Stensby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, then I suggest you index the field in two different ways if you want
> both possible ways of searching. One, where you treat the entire name as
> one token (in lowercase) (then you can search for aver
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With Distributed Search you are limited to # of shards * Integer.MAX_VALUE.
yeah, makes sense. And i would suspect since this is PER INDEX , it applies to
each core only ( so you could have n cores in m shards
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doc ID gaps are zapped during segment merges and index optimization.
>
thanks Otis :)
b
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think there is a limit other than your hardware and the internal Doc
> ID which limits you to 2B docs on 32-bit machines.
Hi Otis,
just curious is this internal doc ID reused when an optimise happen
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:45:40 -0800 (PST)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But for the first question, I am still not clear.
> I think to use the multicore feature we should inform the server. In the
> Jetty server, we are starting the server using: java
> -Dsolr.solr.home=multicore -jar start.jar
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:55:38 -0800 (PST)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Which all files do I need to edit to use the multicore feature?
> 2) Also, where can I specify the index directly so that we can point the
> indexed documents to a custom folder instead of jboss/bin?
Con, please check the
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:46:16 -0700
"Lance Norskog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now: a few hours later there are a different 100 "lastest" documents. How do
> I add those to the index so I will have 200 documents? 'full-import' throws
> away the first 100. 'delta-import' is not implemented. What
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:50:58 -0300
"Jorge Solari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> in the schema file.
or use Dismax query handler.
b
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok so straight by the admin part !
Hi Johanna - not sure what you mean by 'the admin part'.
> it should work .. so it doesn't
if you tell us what you did (what url you called) , what you expect to receive
back (samp
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:09:17 +0200
Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They came to such expectations seeing Solr's own Spellcheck at work -
> if it can suggest correct versions, it should be able to sanitize
> broken words in documents and search them using sanitized input. For
> me, t
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I implemented multi language search, but I didn't finished the website in
> PHP, how can I check it works properly?
maybe by sending to SOLR the queries you plan your PHP frontend to generate ?
___
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sunil Sarje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working with nightly build of Oct 17, 2008 and found the issue that
> something wrong with LuceneQParserPlugin; It takes + as OR
Sunil, please do not hijack the thread :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hi
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:28:23 +0300
christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hum. this mean I have to wait before I index new documents and avoid
> indexing when they are created (I have about 50 000 new documents
> created each day and I was planning to make those searchable ASAP).
you can a
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
prerna07 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The issue with synonym arise when i have number in synonym defination:
>
> ccc =>1,2 gives following result in debugQuery= true :
> MultiPhraseQuery(all:" (1 ) (2 ccc )
> 3")
> all:" (
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
prerna07 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, We want search on these incomplete words.
Look into the NGram token factory . works a treat - I don't think it's
explained a lot in the wiki, but has been discussed in this list in the past,
and you also have Java
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:11:07 -0700
Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been using Varnish (http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/) in front
> of our Solr servers, and have been seeing about a 70% hit rate for the
> queries. We're using SolrJ, and have seen no bad effects of the cache.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But in that case, while doing a full-import I am getting the following
> error:
>
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: QueryElevationComponent requires the
> schema to have a uniqueKeyField
Con, if you don't use the Que
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:27:30 -0700
Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep, you can "fake" it by only using fieldsets (qf) that have a
> > consistent set of stopwords.
>
> does that mean changing the query or changing the schema?
Jon,
- you change schema.xml to define which type each f
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : That's why I was wondering how Dismax breaks it all apart. It makes
> sense...I : suppose what I'd like to have is a way to tell dismax which
> fields NOT to : tokenize the input for. For these fields, it wo
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:58:14 +0530
Dinesh Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please tell me where to upload the files.
anywhere you have access to... your own website, somewhere anyone on the list
can access the files >you< want to share to address your problems :)
b
_
{B
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : : class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you meant is correct only. Please excuse for that I am new to solr. :-(
Con, have a read here :
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-solr1/
it helped me pick up the basics a while back. it refers to 1.2,
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you meant is correct only. Please excuse for that I am new to solr. :-(
hi Con,
nothing to be excused for..but you may want to read the wiki , as it provides
quite a lot of information that should answer your questions
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:32:05 +0530
Dinesh Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it OK to create whole index by Solr web-app?
> If not than ,How can I create index?
>
> I have attached some file that create index now.
>
Dinesh,
you sent the same email 2 1/2 hours ago. sending it again will not g
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be more specific:
> I have the data-config.xml just like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
hi guys,
I may have missed it ,but is it possible to tell the solr.ShingleFilterFactory
the minimum number of grams to generate per shingle? Similar to
NGramTokenizerFactory's minGramSize="3" maxGramSize="3"
thanks!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Ask not what's in
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if you change ps from 100 to 1 and comment out that ord function?
>
>
Otis, I think what I am after is what Hoss described in his last paragraph in
his reply to your email last year :
http://ww
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the table we will be having various column names like CUSTOMER_NAME,
> CUSTOMER_PHONE etc. If we use the default schema.xml, we have to map these
> values to some the default values like cat, features etc. this will cause
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:45:34 -0400
Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing to stop you from breaking up the tsv/csv files into multiple
> tsv/csv files.
Absolutely agreeing with you ... in one system where I implemented SOLR, I
have a process run through the file system and lazily pick
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if you change ps from 100 to 1 and comment out that ord function?
>
>
> Otis
Hi Otis,
no luck - without " " :
smashing pumpkins
smashing pumpkins
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((genre:smash^0.2 | title
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:46:57 -0400
Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. You will def see a speed increasing by avoiding http (especially
> doc at a time http) and using the direct csv loader.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
and the obvious reason that if, for whatever reason,
Hello,
I've seen references to this in the list, but not completely explained...my
apologies if this is FAQ (and for the length of the email).
I am using dismax across a number of fields on an index with data about music
albums & songs - the fields are quite full of stop words. I am trying to
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:39:44 -0700
"Chris Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So finally I modified the Lucene ShingleFilter class to add an
> "outputUnigramIfNoNgram option". Basically, if you set that option,
> and also set outputUnigrams=false, then the filter will tokenize just
> as in
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:46:54 +0530
"Jacob Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a testing suite to gauge the performance of solr
> searches. To do so, I'd like to be able to find out what keywords
> will get me search results. Is there anyway to programaticaly do this
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:53:39 +0530
"Sanjay Suri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my field values has the name "R__ikk__nen" which contains a special
> characters.
>
> Strangely, as I see it anyway, it matches on the search query 'x' ?
>
> Can someone explain or point me to the solution/doc
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:17:12 +
zzh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think this is a stupid method, because the search conditions is too
> long, and the search efficiency will be low, we hope you can help me to solve
> this problem.
Hi,
IMHO,a long set of conditions doesn't make it stupid. Yo
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to store two independent datas in solr index. so I decided to create
> two index.But that's not possible.so i go for multicore concept in solr
> .can u give me step by step procedure to create multicore in solr
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But still i cant maintain two index.
> please help me how to create two cores in solr
What specific problem do you have ?
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Always listen to experts. They'll
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to index two different files in solr.(for ex) I want to store
> two tables like, job_post and job_profile in solr. But now both are stored
> in same place in solr.when i get data from job_post, data come from
>
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:15:21 +0300
Aleksey Gogolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm new to solr and I need to make a search suggest (like google
> suggestions).
>
Hi Aleksey,
please search the archives of this list for subjects containing 'autocomplete'
or 'auto-suggest'. that sho
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:11:47 +0200
Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Launching a multicore solr with dataimporthandler using a mysql driver,
> (driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver") works fine if the mysql connector jar
> (mysql-connector-java-5.0.7-bin.jar) is in the classpath, either jdk
> c
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:21:53 -0700
"Lance Norskog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the ZFS (Silicon Graphics
> originally) is great for really huge files.
hi Lance,
You may be confusing Sun's ZFS with SGI's XFS. The OP referred, i think, to
ZFS.
B
_
{Beto|Nor
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:09:11 -0700
"Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought if I used to copy my string field to a text
> field then I can search for words within it and not limited to the
> entire content. Did I misunderstand that?
but you need to search on the fields that are defined
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:58:50 -0300
"Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A tiny but really explanation can be found here
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
thanks Alexander - indeed, quite short, and focused on shingles ... which , if
I understand corr
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:18:12 +1200
"Gene Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this interpreted as meaning, there are 10 documents that will match
> with 'car' in the title, and likewise 6 'boat' and 2 'bike'?
Correct.
> If so, is there any way to get counts for the *number times* a value
>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:23:48 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
> "Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will help you?
>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
"Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will help you?
> Why don't you use the HTTP interface SOLR provides?
>
> Anyways, if you need to develop a web service (SOAP compliant) to access
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:07:19 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because i use chinese character, for example "ibm___"
> solr will parse it into a term "ibm" and a phraze "_ __"
> can i use solr to query with a term "ibm" and a term "_" and a term
> "__
hi :)
does anyone have a .wsdl definition for the example bundled with SOLR?
if nobody has it, would it be useful to have one ?
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Intelligence: Finding an error in a Knuth text.
Stupidity: Cashing that $2.56 check you got.
I spe
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:33:02 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the name field is text,which is analysed, i use the query
> "name:ibmT63notebook"
why do you search with no spaces? is this free text entered by a user, or is it
part of a link which you control ?
PS: please dont top-po
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:34:56 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually we have commit and optimize as separate request parameters
> defaulting to true for both full-import and delta-import. You can add a
> request parameter optimize=false for delta-import if you want to c
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:14:32 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
Please do not hijack mail threads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Ask not what's inside
Hi again,
I see in the DIH wiki page :
[...]
full-import [..]
commit: (default 'true'). Tells whether to commit+optimize after the operation
[...]
but nothing for delta-import... I think it would be useful , a 'commit'
(default=true) , 'optimize' (default=false) for the delta-import - these sh
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:22:26 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is only SpellCheckComponent that you are interested in, then see
> SOLR-622.
>
> You can add this to your SCC config to rebuild SCC after every commit:
> true
ah great stuff , thanks Shalin.
B
Guys + gals,
just a question of form - would DIH itself be the right place to implement a
"URLS to call after successfully completing a DIH full or partial load" - for
example, to rebuild spellchecker when new items have been added? Or should
that be part of my external process (cron -> shell
hi guys,
First of all, thanks for DIH - it's great :)
One thing I noticed during my tests ( nightly, 2008-08-16) is that, if the DB
is not available during SOLR startup time, the whole core won't initialise .-
the error is shown below.
I was wondering,
1) would it be possible to have DIH bomb o
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:36:32 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi :)
> I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure
> i
> had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
> wiki) on latest n
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:34:47 -0400
"Steven A Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The kind of filter Walter is talking about - a generalized language-aware
> character normalization Solr/Lucene filter - does not yet exist. My guess is
> that if/when it does materialize, both the Solr and th
( 2 in 1 reply)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:59:21 -0700
Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stripping accents doesn't quite work. The correct translation
> is language-dependent. In German, o-dieresis should turn into
> "oe", but in English, it shoulde be "o" (as in "co__perate" or
> "M__tle
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:21:13 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SpellCheckerRequestHandler is now deprecated with Solr 1.3 and it has
> been replaced by SpellCheckComponent.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
which works quite well with dismax.
B
__
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:26 -0700
"Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
> `category`. Is there a way to do this?
of course. Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax (in
particular, follow the link to Lucene syntax..
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:44:42 -0400
"Steven A Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solr is Unicode aware. The ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory handles diacritics
> for the ISO Latin-1 section of the Unicode character set. UTF (do you mean
> UTF-8?) is a (set of) Unicode serialization(s), and once Sol
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:53:12 -0400
"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What happens if I issue:
> >
> > 1
> > 1new
> >
> >
> > will
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:50 -0700
Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the
> > add happens before delete, in which case i end up with no more doc
> > id=1 ?
>
> As long as you are sending these requests on the same thread
hi :)
I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure i
had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
wiki) on latest nightly build, i cannot see any sign of it being loaded or use,
although the classpath seems to be pointing to them (see b
Hello :)
I *think* i know the answer, but i'd like to confirm :
Say I have
1old
already indexed and commited (ie, 'live' )
What happens if I issue:
1
1new
will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the add happens
before delete, in which case i end up with no more doc
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Vj Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i also sends tag as well.
maybe you need
instead of
?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a
good idea. It is h
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:25:34 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:41:08 -0300
> "Scott Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I currently have multiple documents that i would like to index but i would
> > like to c
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
SoupErman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I needed to run a search with a query containing the word "not", so I removed
> "not" from the stopwords.txt file. Which seemed to work, at least as far as
> parsing the query. It was now successfully searching for tha
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
matt connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do I file a bug report?
https://issues.apache.org/jira
thanks!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be very
sele
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2 Tokenizers?
i wondered about that too, but didn't have the time to test...
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Always listen to experts. They'll t
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:21:28 -0400
"Ian Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to preserve case for the data, but not for indexing, I have
> created two fields. One is type Author that is defined as:
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true">
>
>
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:02:51 -0400
Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a
> school project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked
> out font or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business
> type
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:58:42 -0300
Leonardo Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm looking for a Ferrari. CarStore says that there are 5 ads for
> Ferrari, but one ad has 2 Ferraris being sold, the other ad has 3
> Ferraris and all the others have 1 Ferrari each, meaning that there are
> 5 ad
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:41:08 -0300
"Scott Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently have multiple documents that i would like to index but i would
> like to combine two fields to produce the unique key.
>
> the documents either have 1 or the other fields so by combining the two
> fields i w
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:43:44 -0500
"Kashyap, Raghu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Kashyap,
please don't hijack topic threads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
thanks!!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Software QA is like cleaning my cat's litter box:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Vicky_Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we get solr 1.3 release as soon as possible? Otherwise some interim
> release (1.2.x) containing DataImportHandler will also a good option.
>
> Any Thoughts?
have you tried one of the nightly builds? I've been f
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:29:30 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If there is a still room for new log design for Solr and the
> > community is
> > open for it then I can try to come up with some proposal. Doing logo
> > for
> > Mahout was really interesting experience.
> >
>
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
