Re: questions about autocommit & committing documents

First: Usually you do not use post.jar for updating your index. It's a simple tool, but normally you use features like the csv- or xml-update-RequestHandler. Have a look at "UpdateCSV" and "UpdateXMLMessages" in the wiki. There you can find examples on how to commit explicitly. With the post.jar

Re: questions about autocommit & committing documents

Hi Andy, Andy-152 wrote: > > > 1 > 1000 > > > has been commented out. > > - With commented out, does it mean that every new document > indexed to Solr is being auto-committed individually? Or that they are not > being auto-committed at all? > I am not sure, whether there is a de

Re: Swapping cores with SolrJ

Hi Shaun, I think it is more easy to fix this problem, if we got more information about what is going on in your application. Please, could you provide the CoreAdminResponse returned by car.process() for us? Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.

Re: Solr CoreAdmin create ignores dataDir Parameter

Frank, have a look at SOLR-646. Do you think a workaround for the data-dir-tag in the solrconfig.xml can help? I think about something like ${solr./data/corename} for illustration. Unfortunately I am not very skilled in working with solr's variables and therefore I do not know what variables ar

Re: SolrCloud distributed indexing (Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?)

I must add something to my last post: When saying it could be used together with techniques like consistent hashing, I mean it could be used at indexing time for indexing documents, since I assumed that the number of shards does not change frequently and therefore an ODV-case becomes relatively i

Re: SolrCloud distributed indexing (Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?)

every hour. :-) Thoughts? Kind regards Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > > On 2010-09-06 16:41, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:18 AM, MitchK wrote: >> [...consistent hashing...] >>> But it doesn't solve the problem at all, correct me if I am wrong, but: &

Re: SolrCloud distributed indexing (Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?)

Andrzej, thank you for sharing your experiences. > b) use consistent hashing as the mapping schema to assign documents to a > changing number of shards. There are many explanations of this schema on > the net, here's one that is very simple: > Boom. With the given explanation, I understan

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Yonik, are there any discussions about SolrCloud-indexing? I would be glad to join them, if I find some interesting papers about that topic. - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/anyone-use-hadoop-solr-tp485333p1426469.html Sent from the Solr - User maili

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Thanks for your detailed feedback Andzej! >From what I understood, SOLR-1301 becomes obsolete ones Solr becomes cloud-ready, right? > Looking into the future: eventually, when SolrCloud arrives we will be > able to index straight to a SolrCloud cluster, assigning documents to > shards throug

Re: Show a facet filter "All"

Peter, take a close look at tagging and and excluding filters: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#LocalParams_for_faceting Another way would be to index your services_raw as services_raw/Exclusive rental services_raw/Fotoreport services_raw/Live music In this case, you can use t

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Hi, this topic started a few months ago, however there are some questions from my side, that I couldn't answer by looking at the SOLR-1301-issue nor the wiki-pages. Let me try to explain my thoughts: Given: a Hadoop-cluster, a solr-search-cluster and nutch as a crawling-engine which also perform

Re: full control over norm values?

Hi Micheal, have a look at SweetSpotSimilarity (Lucene). Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/full-control-over-norm-values-tp1366910p1367462.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr creates whitespace in dismax query

Johann, try to remove the wordDelimiterFilter from the query-analyzer of your fieldType. If your index-analyzer-wordDelimiterFilter is well configured, it will find everything you want. Does this solve the problem? Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n

Re: Why it's boosted up?

Hi Scott, > (so shorter fields are automatically boosted up). " > The theory behind that is the following (in easy words): Let's say you got two documents, each doc contains on 1 field (like it was in my example). Additionally we got a query that contains two words. Let's say doc1 contains o

Re: Doing Shingle but also keep special single word

will be equal. Kind regards, - Mitch scott chu wrote: > > I don't quite understand additional-field-way? Do you mean making another > field that stores special words particularly but no indexing for that > field? > > Scott > > - Original Message - &g

Re: Doing Shingle but also keep special single word

Hi, keepword-filter is no solution for this problem, since this would lead to the problematic that one has to manage a word-dictionary. As explained, this would lead to too much effort. You can easily add outputUnigrams=true and check out the analysis.jsp for this field. So you can see how much

Re: How to limit rows to which highlighting applies

Alex, it sounds like it would make sense. Use cases could be i.e. clustering or similar techniques. However, in my opinion the point of view for such a modification is not the right. I.e. one wants to have got several resultsets. I could imagine that one does a primary-query (the query for the d

RE: Boosting DisMax queries with !boost component

Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > >> qf needs to have spaces in it, unfortunately the local query parser can >> not >> deal with that, as Erik Hatcher mentioned some months ago. > > By "local query parser", you mean what I call the LocalParams stuff (for > lack of being sure of the proper term)? >

Re: SolrJ Response + JSON

Hi, as I promised, I want to give a feedback for transforming SolrJ's output into JSON with the package from json.org (the package was the json.org's one): I need to make a small modification to the package, since they store the JSON-key-value-pairs in a HashMap, I changed this to a LinkedHa

Re: Boosting DisMax queries with !boost component

Hi, qf needs to have spaces in it, unfortunately the local query parser can not deal with that, as Erik Hatcher mentioned some months ago. A solution would be to do something like that: {!dismax%20qf=$yourqf}yourQuery&yourgf=title^1.0 tags^2.0 Since you are using the dismax-query-parser, you c

Re: Nabble problems?

I got some problems with Nabble, too. Nabble sends some warnings that my posts are still pending to the mailing-list, while people were already answering to my initial questions. Did you send a message to the nabble-support? Kind regards, - Mitch kenf_nc wrote: > > The Nabble.com page for Sol

Re: SolrJ Response + JSON

edback! Are you sure that you cannot change the SOLR results at query time according to your needs? Unfortunately, it is not possible in this case. Kind regards, Mitch Am 28.07.2010 16:49, schrieb Chantal Ackermann: Hi Mitch On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 16:38 +0200, MitchK wrote: Thank you,

Re: SolrJ Response + JSON

e JacksonParser with Spring. http://json.org/ lists parsers for different programming languages. Cheers, Chantal On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 15:08 +0200, MitchK wrote: Hello , Second try to send a mail to the mailing list... I need to translate SolrJ's response into JSON-response. I can not

Re: SolrJ Response + JSON

you haven't already, and query with wt=json. Can't get mucht easier. Cheers, On Wednesday 28 July 2010 15:08:26 MitchK wrote: Hello , Second try to send a mail to the mailing list... I need to translate SolrJ's response into JSON-response. I can not query Solr directly, becau

SolrJ Response + JSON

Hello , Second try to send a mail to the mailing list... I need to translate SolrJ's response into JSON-response. I can not query Solr directly, because I need to do some math with the responsed data, before I show the results to the client. Any experiences how to translate SolrJ's response i

SolrJ Response + JSON

Hello community, I need to transform SolrJ - responses into JSON, after some computing on those results by another application has finished. I can not do those computations on the Solr - side. So, I really have to translate SolrJ's output into JSON. Any experiences how to do so without writing

Re: DIH : SQL query (sub-entity) is executed although variable is not set (null or empty list)

Hi Chantal, instead of: /* multivalued, not required */ you do: /* multivalued, not required */ The yourCustomFunctionToReturnAQueryString(vip, querystring1, querystring2) { if(vip != n

Re: DIH : SQL query (sub-entity) is executed although variable is not set (null or empty list)

Hi Chantal, > However, with this approach indexing time went up from 20min to more > than 5 hours. > This is 15x slower than the initial solution... wow. >From MySQL I know that IN ()-clauses are the embodiment of endlessness - they perform very, very badly. New idea: Create a method which

Re: DIH : SQL query (sub-entity) is executed although variable is not set (null or empty list)

Hi Chantal, did you tried to write a http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DIHCustomFunctions custom DIH Function ? If not, I think this will be a solution. Just check, whether "${prog.vip}" is an empty string or null. If so, you need to replace it with a value that never can response anything. So the vi

Re: Solr Doc Lucene Doc !?

Stockii, Solr's index is a Lucene Index. Therefore, Solr documents are Lucene documents. Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Doc-Lucene-Doc-tp995922p995968.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

Good morning, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632 - Mitch Li Li wrote: > > where is the link of this patch? > > 2010/7/24 Yonik Seeley : >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, MitchK wrote: >>> why do we do not send the output of TermsComponent of every

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

Okay, but than LiLi did something wrong, right? I mean, if the document exists only at one shard, it should get the same score whenever one requests it, no? Of course, this only applies if nothing gets changed between the requests. The only remaining problem here would be, that you need distribut

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

That only works if the docs are exactly the same - they may not be. Ahm, what? Why? If the uniqueID is the same, the docs *should* be the same, don't they? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/a-bug-of-solr-distributed-search-tp983533p990563.html Sent from the So

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

values to disk (Which I do not suggest). Thoughts? - Mitch MitchK wrote: > > Yonik, > > why do we do not send the output of TermsComponent of every node in the > cluster to a Hadoop instance? > Since TermsComponent does the map-part of the map-reduce concept, Hadoop > only need

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

Yonik, why do we do not send the output of TermsComponent of every node in the cluster to a Hadoop instance? Since TermsComponent does the map-part of the map-reduce concept, Hadoop only needs to reduce the stuff. Maybe we even do not need Hadoop for this. After reducing, every node in the cluste

Re: nested query and number of matched records

Thank you three for your feedback! Chantal, unfortuntately kenf is right. Facetting won't work in this special case. > parallel calls. > Yes, this will be the solution. However, this would lead to a second HTTP-request and I hoped to be able to avoid it. Chantal Ackermann wrote: > > Sure S

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

It already was sorted by score. The problem here is the following: Shard_A and shard_B contain doc_X and doc_X. If you are querying for something, doc_X could have a score of 1.0 at shard_A and a score of 12.0 at shard_B. You can never be sure which doc Solr sees first. In the bad case, Solr see

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

I don't know much about the code. Maybe you can tell me to what file you are referring? However, from the comments one can see, that the problem is known but one decided to let it happen, because of System requirements in the Java version. - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://luce

Re: nested query and number of matched records

Oh,... I just see, there is no direct question ;-). How can I specify the number of returned documents in the desired way *within* one request? - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/nested-query-and-number-of-matched-records-tp983756p983773.html Sent from

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

Ah, okay. I understand your problem. Why should doc x be at position 1 when searching for the first time, and when I search for the 2nd time it occurs at position 8 - right? I am not sure, but I think you can't prevent this without custom coding or making a document's occurence unique. Kind rega

nested query and number of matched records

Hello community, I got a situation, where I know that some types of documents contain very extensive information and other types are giving more general information. Since I don't know whether a user searches for general or extensive information (and I don't want to ask him when he uses the defau

Re: a bug of solr distributed search

Li Li, this is the intended behaviour, not a bug. Otherwise you could get back the same record in a response for several times, which may not be intended by the user. Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/a-bug-of-solr-distributed-search-tp98

Re: Beginner question

Here you can find params and their meanings for the dismax-handler. You may not find anything in the wiki by searching for a parser ;). Link: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxRequestHandler Wiki: DisMaxRequestHandler Kind regards - Mitch Erik Hatcher-4 wrote: > > Consider using the dismax

Re: Autocomplete with NGrams

It sounds like the best solution here, right. However, I do not want to exclude the possibility of doing things one *should* do in different cores with different configurations and schema.xml in one core. I haven't completly read the lucidimagination article, but I would suggest you to do your wo

Re: Autocomplete with NGrams

Frank, have a look at Solr's example-directory's and look for 'multicore'. There you can see an example-configuration for a multicore-environment. Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-NGrams-tp979312p979610.html Sent from

Re: Problem with Solr-Mailinglist

Thank you both. I will do what Hoss suggested, tomorrow. The mail was sent over the nabble-board and another time over my thunderbird-client. Both with the same result. So there was not more HTML-code than it was in every of my other postings. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in contex

Problem with Solr-Mailinglist

Hello, I try to post http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-in-an-extra-project-what-about-replication-scaling-etc-td977961.html#a977961 this message for the fourth time to the Solr Mailinglist and everytime I get the following response from the Mailing-list's server: > solr-user@lucene.

Re: solr with hadoop

I need to revive this discussion... If you do distributed indexing correctly, what about updating the documents and what about replicating them correctly? Does this work? Or wasn't this an issue? Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-wit

Re: How I can use score value for my function

Britske good workaround! I did not thought about the possibility of using subqueries. Regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-I-can-use-score-value-for-my-function-tp899662p931448.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: How I can use score value for my function

Ramzesua, this is not possible, because Solr does not know what is the resulting score at query-time (as far as I know). The score will be computed, when every hit from every field is combined by the scorer. Furthermore I have shown you an alternative in the other threads. It makes not exactly wh

Re: Wither field compresed="true" ?

David, well, I am no committer, but I noticed that Lucene will no longer care of compressing (I think this was because of the trouble when doing this) and maybe this is the reason why Solr keeps this option no longer available. Unfortunately, I do not have got any link for it, but I think this w

Question about the mailinglist (junk on my behalf)

Hello community, since a few days I recieve daily some mails with suspicious content. It is said that some of my mails were rejected, because of the file-types of the mail's attachements and other things. This wonders me a lot, because I didn't send any mails with attachements and even the eMail-

Re: MoreLikeThis (mlt) : use the match's maxScore for result score normalization

Hi Chantal, Munich? Germany seems to be soo small :-). Chantal Ackermann wrote: > > I only want a way to show to the > user a kind of relevancy or similarity indicator (for example using a > range of 10 stars) that would give a hint on how similar the mlt hit is > to the input (match) item.

Re: MoreLikeThis (mlt) : use the match's maxScore for result score normalization

Chantal, have a look at http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_1/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.html More like this to have a guess what the MLT's score concerns. The problem is that you can't compare scores. The query for the "normal" result-response was maybe something like

Re: Solr 1.4 - Image-Highlighting and Payloads

Sebastian, sounds like an exciting project. > We've found the argument "TokenGroup" in method "highlightTerm" > implemented in SimpleHtmlFormatter. "TokenGroup" provides the method > "getPayload()", but the returned value is always "NULL". > No, Token provides this method, not TokenGroup. Bu

Re: solr with hadoop

I wanted to add a Jira-issue about exactly what Otis is asking here. Unfortunately, I haven't time for it because of my exams. However, I'd like to add a question to Otis' ones: If you destribute the indexing-progress this way, are you able to replicate the different documents correctly? Thank y

Re: Question on dynamic fields

Barani, without more background on dynamic fields, I would say that the most easiest way would be to define a suffix for each of the fields you want to index into the mentioned dynamic field and to redefine your dynamic field - condition. If suffix does not work, because of other dynamic-field d

Re: Re: Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Otis, And again I wished I were registred. I will check the JIRA and when I feel comfortable with it, I will open it. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-and-Nutch-Droids-to-use-or-not-to-use-tp900069p904145.html Sent from the Solr - U

Re: DismaxRequestHandler

Joe, please, can you provide an example of what you are thinking of? Subqueries with Solr... I've never seen something like that before. Thank you! Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DismaxRequestHandler-tp903641p904142.html Sent from th

Re: Document boosting troubles

Hi, > One problem down, two left! =) bf ==> bq did the trick, thanks. Now at > least if I can't get the DIH solution working I don't have to tack that on > every query string. > I would really recommend to use a boost function. If your rank will change in future implementations, you do not

Re: Master master?

What is the usecase for such an architecture? Do you send requests to two different masters for indexing and that's why they need to be synchronized? Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Master-master-tp884253p903233.html Sent from the Solr -

Re: solr multi-node

Antonello, here are a few links to the Solr Wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication Solr Replication http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearchDesign Distributed Search Design http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch Distributed Search http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud So

Re: Document boosting troubles

Sorry, I've overlooked your other question. > > rank:1^10.0 rank:2^9.0 rank:3^8.0 rank:4^7.0 rank:5^6.0 rank:6^5.0 > rank:7^4.0 rank:8^3.0 rank:9^2.0 > > This is wrong. You need to change "bf" to "bq". Bf -> boosting function Bq -> boosting query. -- View this message

Re: Document boosting troubles

Hi, first of all, are you sure that row.put('$docBoost',docBoostVal) is correct? I think it should be row.put($docBoost,docBoostVal); - unfortunately I am not sure. Hm, I think, until you can solve the problem with the docBoosts itself, you should use a functionQuery. Use "div(1, rank)" as boo

Re: Re: Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

h you can use today: > > http://search-lucene.com/?q=ExternalFileField&fc_project=Solr > > Otis > > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > > - Original Message >&g

Re: Re: Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

> Solr doesn't know anything about OPIC, but I suppose you can feed the OPIC > score computed by Nutch into a Solr field and use it during scoring, if > you want, say with a function query. > Oh! Yes, that makes more sense than using the OPIC as doc-boost-value. :-) Anywhere at the Lucene Mail

RE: Re: Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Good morning! Great feedback from you all. This really helped a lot to get an impression of what is possible and what is not. What is interesting to me are some detail questions. Let's assume Solr is possible to work on his own with distributed indexing, so that the client does not need to know

Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Thanks, that really helps to find the right beginning for such a journey. :-) > * Use Solr, not Nutch's search webapp > As far as I have read, Solr can't scale, if the index gets too large for one Server > The setup explained here has one significant caveat you also need to keep > in mind:

Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Thank you for the feedback, Otis. Yes, I thought that such an approach is usefull if the number of pages to crawl is relatively low. However, what about using solr + nutch? Exists the problem that this would not scale, if the index becomes too large, up to now? What about extending nutch with fe

Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Hello community, from several discussions about Solr and Nutch, I got some questions for a virtual web-search-engine. I know I've posted this message to the mailing list a few days ago, but the thread got injected and at least I did not get any more postings about the topic and so I try to reop

Re: Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Just wanted to push the topic a little bit, because those question come up quite often and it's very interesting for me. Thank you! - Mitch MitchK wrote: > > Hello community and a nice satureday, > > from several discussions about Solr and Nutch, I got some questions fo

Re: Solr DataConfig / DIH Question

Guys??? You are in the wrong thread. Please, send a message to the mailing list, do not answer to existing posts. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-and-Nutch-Droids-to-use-or-not-to-use-tp890640p892041.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing li

Solr and Nutch/Droids - to use or not to use?

Hello community and a nice satureday, from several discussions about Solr and Nutch, I got some questions for a virtual web-search-engine. The requirements: I. I need a scalable solution for a growing index that becomes larger than one machine can handle. If I add more hardware, I want to linear

conditional Document Boost

Hello out there, I am searching for a solution for conditional Document Boosting. During analyzing the fields of a document, I want to create a document boost based on some metrics. There are two approaches: First: I preprocess the data. The main problem with this is, that I need to take care ab

Re: searching documents in solr

Hi dotriz, to answer such questions it would be beneficial for us, if you can provide some schema.xml-information. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/searching-documents-in-solr-tp844800p844847.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar

Re: IndexSearcher and Caches

Good question. Well, I never worked productively with SolrJ. But two things: The first: As the documentation says, you *should* get your IndexSearcher from your SolrQueryRequest-object. The second: As a developer of the SolrJ I would do as much as I can automatically behind the curtain. That mean

Re: IndexSearcher and Caches

Ahh, now I understand. No, you need no second IndexSearcher as long as the Server is alive. You can reuse your searcher for every user. The only commands you are executing per user are those to create a search-query. Kind regards, - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.

Re: sort by function

Where is your query? You don't search for anything. The q-param is empty. You got two options (untested): remove the q-param or search for something special. I think removing is not a good idea. Instead search for *:* would retrive ALL results that match your filter-query. Kind regards - Mitch

Re: IndexSearcher and Caches

> In my case, I have an index which will not be modified after creation. > Does > this mean that in a multi-user scenario, I can have a static IndexSearcher > object that can be shared by multiple users ? > I am not sure, what you mean with "multi-user"-scenario. Can you tell me what you got

Re: sort by function

The score isn't computed when you try to access it. Furthermore your functionQuery needs to become part of the score. So what can you do??? The keyword is boosting. Do: {!func}product(0.88,rank)^x Where x is a boosting factor based on your experiences. Keep in mind that the result of your pro

Re: IndexSearcher and Caches

Rahul, the IndexSearcher of Solr gets shared with every request within two commits. That means one IndexSearcher + its caches got a lifetime of one commit. After every commit, there will be a new one created. The cache does not mean, that they are applied automatically. They mean, that a filter

Re: Personalized Search

Hi dc, > - at query time, specify boosts for 'my items' items > Do you mean something like document-boost or do you want to include something like "OR myItemId:100^100" ? Can you tell us how you would specify document-boostings at query-time? Or are you querying something like a boolean fiel

Re: Personalized Search

Hi RiH, I think the idea is interesting, but the approach you think of is a little bit difficult to implement. Imagine you got 10.000 users, than a Solr document must actually have 10.000 fields which are responsible to managing the whole stuff. Furthermore your data will change quite often. So t

Re: sort by function

Forget what I said about the second case. The second case is a simple sort on your field. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sort-by-function-tp814380p821252.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: sort by function

Can you please do some math to show the principle? Do you want to do something like this: finalScore = score * rank finalScore = rank ??? If the first is the case, than it is done by default (have a look at the wiki-example for making more recent documents more relevant). If the second is the

Re: sort by function

Can you provide us some more information on what you really want to do? Like the examples in the wiki said, the returned value of the function query is multiplied with the score - you can boost your returned value from the function query, if you like to do so. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Okay, I will do so in future, if another problem like this occurs. At the moment, everything is fine after I followed your suggestions. Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p820355.html Sent from th

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Thank you for the explanation, Hoss. At the moment, I am not able to try out Solr, because I am going to write my exam from tomorrow to Wednesday. This is because I would try out as much as possible and dive into some sourcecode and this would be no good idea in this context. So my questions are

Re: increase(change) relevancy

Hi Ramzesua, take a look at the example of the function query that influences relvancy by the popular-field of the example-directory. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#Using_FunctionQuery Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/increase

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Btw: This thread helps a lot to understand the difference between qf and pf :-) http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Dismax-query-phrases-td489994.html#a489995 -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p783379.html Sent from the

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Okay, let me be more specific: I got a custom StopWordFilter and a WordMarkingFilter. The WordMarkingFilter is an easy implementation to determine which type a word is. The StopWordFilter (my implementation) removes specific types of words *and* all markers from all words. This leads to a delet

Re: How do I return all the results in an index?

Did you clean up the Browser-Cache? Maybe you need to restart (I am currently not sure, whether Solr caches HTTP-requests, even when you did a commit???). Kind regards - Mitch -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-do-I-return-all-the-results-in-an-index-tp7772

Re: Custom SearchComponent to reset facet value counts after collapse

I would prefer extending the given CollapseComponent, because of performance-reasons. What you want to do sounds a bit like making things too complicate. There are two options I would prefer: 1. get the schema-information for every field you want to query against and define, whether you want to

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

I got an idea: If I would catenate all relevant fields to one large multiValued field, I could query like this: {!dismax qf='myLargeField^5'}solr development //mm is 1 (100%) if not set Additionally to that, I add a phraseQuery {!dismax qf='myLargeField^5'}solr development AND title:(solr develo

Re: Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Thank you for responsing. This would be possible. However, I wouldn't like to do so, because a match in "title" should boost higher than a match in "category". -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Short-DismaxRequestHandler-Question-tp775913p776238.html Sent fr

Re: Custom SearchComponent to reset facet value counts after collapse

When is the returned facet-info the expected info for your multiValued fields? Before or after your collapse? It could be possible, that you need to facet only on your multiValued fields before you are collapsing to retrive the right values. If this is the case, you need to integrate the before-co

Short DismaxRequestHandler Question

Hello community, I need a minimum should match only on some fields, not on all. Let me give you an example: title: "Breaking News: New information about Solr 1.5" category: development tag: Solr News If I am searching for "Solr development", I want to return this doc, although I defined a minim

Re: synonym filter problem for string or phrase

Just for clear terminology: You mean field, not fieldType. FieldType is the definition of tokenizers, filters etc.. You apply a fieldType on a field. And you query against a field, not against a whole fieldType. :-) Kind regards - Mitch Marco Martinez-2 wrote: > > Hi Ranveer, > > If you don't

Re: Custom SearchComponent to reset facet value counts after collapse

Good morning, I do not have the time to read your full code very carefully at the moment. I will do so later on, however: Have a look at simpleFacets. Consider the method that creates the facetCounts. When I got it right in mind, the author uses the IndexSearcher's numDoc(arg1, arg2) method. Tha

Re: Custom SearchComponent to reset facet value counts after collapse

Unfortunately this patch does not support multiValued-fields (as this is said by the author and some others that worked with that patch). I had a look on others, but they seem to have the same problem. What would I suggest, hmm... Out-of-the-box and at this time (it's late here in Germany) I got o

  1   2   3   >