his solid.
Happy to discuss.
Marcus
On 2020/06/17 19:37:20, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hi everyone,>
>
> Moving a conversation that was happening on the PMC list to the public>
> forum. Most of the following is just me recapping the conversation that has>
> happened so far.>
n error. Ok it is the limit of
the HTTP GET Request.
My Questeion: Is there an Alternative to "REST/HTTP GET" in solr? E.g. POST or
something else?
Best reguards,
Marcus
Thanks works fine with 5.2.1 now.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Juni 2015 15:03
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: solr 5.2.0 example dih: dataimport failed
On 6/15/2015 5:56 AM, Veit, Marcus (marcus.v...@uni
tar xzf solr-5.2.0.tgz
cd solr-5.2.0
./bin/solr -e dih
http://192.168.56.101:8983/solr/#/db/dataimport ==> Works NOT!
What's wrong?
Have I done something wrong?
Is it a bug in 5.2 example?
Where in solr is a useful logfile helping with such problems?
Thanks
Marcus
Brad,
Please contact me at marcusattrueprobitydotcom...I would like to touch base
with you.
Thanks
Marcus
er in SolrJ?
Ideally I'd like to do something like
http://localhost:8983/solr/mlt?stream.body=electronics%20memory&mlt.fl=manu,cat&mlt.interestingTerms=list&mlt.mintf=0
in SolrJ. Currently I'm defining most of the MLT specific parameters in the
solrconfig.xml. Is that possibl
rch? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Details-about-MLT-features-tp3154700p3157289.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
asure?
Thanks in advance
Marcus
FacetFunctionComponent but felt that I should drop a mail here asking if it
is already possible.
Is it even remotely possible to create this function in SOLR ?
Cheers
//Marcus Herou
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
http://www.tailsweep.com/
Sure, that seems fair if I would have thousands of segments. However I have
started a total rebuild of the index which started 2 days ago. I only have
about 100-150 segments right now per core.
Is that much at all ?
Cheers
//Marcus
2010/1/29 Wangsheng Mei
> In addition to destory the &qu
If one only have additions do I then need to optimize the index at all ?
I thought that only update/deletes created "holes" in the index. Or should
the index be sorted on disk at all times, is that the reason ?
Cheers
//Marcus
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+4
Thanks.
Yup, I have reloaded the wiki all morning (GMT+1 time)
Cheers
//Marcus
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Marcus Herou >wrote:
>
> > That seems sweet! One conf dir, man
the
javadoc or nabble)
* If one perform the changes through CoreAdminHandler then where are the
changes persisted ? solr.xml ?
Cheers mate
//Marcus
2009/8/28 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> have you looked at the coreadminhandler?
>
> say you always write to "newcore"
>
&g
o choose which indices to search in to utilize
the memory better. We probably need to distribute a file to the clients so
they know where each index reside (or have the conf in a DB)
Any thoughts ?
Cheers
//Marcus
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
marcus.he...@tails
Out of my head... but are you not supposed to active the stream-handler in
SOLR ? Think it is documented...
Cheers
//Marcus
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
> Yes, I uploaded the CSV file that I get it from Database then I ran that
> cmd and I have the error.
&
Yes exactly just being friendly sharing a working routine. Took me some
hours to figure out DIH myself at the time.
//Marcus
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:36:35 +0200
> Marcus Herou wrote:
>
> > Sharing some of our exports from D
ch will wipe your index...
GET "http://
$server:$port/$path/dataimport?command=full-import&clean=true&optimize=true"
Hope this helps out some.
Cheers
//Marcus
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Francis Yakin wrote:
> Norberto,
>
> Yes, DIH is one of the option we thi
Hz
Quad, 4 disks RAIDed 1+0. I can get these for about *$4700 or do you think I
should go for buying fewer 2U boxes with 8 disks ?*
I know that it is hard to just give a straight answer without a thorough
benchmark but just asking about the gut feeling here basically.
Cheers
//Marcus
On Wed, Jul
soon.
//Marcus
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I currently have an index which is 16GB per machine (8 machines = 128GB)
> (data is stored externally, not in index) and is growing like crazy (we are
> indexing blogs which is crazy by nature) and have
fields and collecting results ?
What I'm trying to find out is what I can do to get most bang for the buck
with a limited (aren't we all limited?) budget.
Kindly
//Marcus
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
http://www.tai
questions.
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Marcus Herou >wrote:
>
> > Aha!
> >
> > Hmm , googling wont help me I see. any hints of usages ?
> >
> > /M
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
Or
curl http://$server:$port/solr/$core/update -H "Content-Type: text/xml"
--data-binary '*:*'
curl http://$server:$port/solr/$core/update -H "Content-Type: text/xml"
--data-binary ''
curl http://$server:$port/solr/$core/update -H "Content-Type:
> work out-of-the-box for trie fields I think. But you could use facet.query
> to achieve the same effect. On my simple benchmarks I've found trie fields
> to give a huge improvement in range searches.
>
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Marcus Herou >wrote:
>
> &
we are getting into a state where reindexing is starting to
become impossible...
Keep up the fantastic work
//Marcus
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Ning Li wrote:
> You mean doc A and doc B will become one doc after adding index 2 to
> index 1? I don't think this is currently
s --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Marcus Herou
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 7:00:57 AM
> > Subject: Solr-1.4 indexing slower ?
> >
> >
description
add doc B to index2 with id=X,score=1.2
somehow add index2 to index1 so id=XX has score=1.2 when searching in index1
The resulting index should have 1 doc.
So this is not really what I want right ?
Sorry for being a smart-ass...
Kindly
//Marcus
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:10 PM
2009 at 5:10 PM, Marcus Herou wrote:
> Guys!
>
> Thanks for these insights, I think we will head for Lucene level merging
> strategy (two or more indexes).
> When merging I guess the second index need to have the same doc ids
> somehow. This is an internal id in Lucene, not that
: ExternalFileField + FunctionQuery stuff
would not work very well performance wise or what do you mean ?
I sure like bleeding edge :)
Cheers dudes
//Marcus
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I should emphasize that the PR trick I
... I launched 1.4 due to the fact that
the rumours said that date faceting was faster in solr-1.4 which I believe
it is. That's why I missed to profile indexing speed.
Did not Lucene as well change version between the two ?
Wondering if anyone else experience the same issues.
//Marcus
--
Ma
ng to get this to work
(negates Q3). We have 8 shards as of current, what would the most efficient
way be to reindexing the whole shebang ? Dump the entire database to disk
(sigh), create many xml file splits and use curl in a
random/hash(numServers) manner on them ?
Kindly
//Marcus
--
M
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.0
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Cool!
>
> GET '
> http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/s
Cool!
GET '
http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/select?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q={!boostb=blogRank
v=$qq}&qq=title:solr&debugQuery=on'
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> That seems wise... PageRank * Text-based Scoring.
>
> So you mean
rched for "solr"
GET '
http://127.0.0.1:8110/solr/test/select?indent=on&start=0&rows=100&q={!boostb=blogRank
v=$qq}&qq=title:solr'
I might get blogId=1 as nr1 in the results even though it had lower blogRank
due to the higher frequency of the term "solr&
That is fantastic, I am creating a really small index right now trying to
figure out howto implement the FunctionQuery for this.
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Marcus Herou
> wrote:
> > Great! That seems like so
Works like a charm!
Thank you sir.
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> That is fantastic, I am creating a really small index right now trying to
> figure out howto implement the FunctionQuery for this.
>
> //Marcus
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 20
Yep it is / was, solved now.
Thanks Grant and Yonik.
Published the setup here: http://dev.tailsweep.com/solr-external-scoring/en/
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> See also my comment on your PageRank question, which I take is the same
> issue. Namel
And I published the setup here:
http://dev.tailsweep.com/solr-external-scoring/en/
/M
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Works like a charm!
>
> Thank you sir.
>
> //Marcus
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Marcus Herou > wrote:
>
>&
nd/or pseudo code ?
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Marcus Herou wrote:
>
> Hi.
>>
>> I've posted before but here it goes again:
>>
>> I have BlogData data which is more or less 100% static but one field is
>> not
>> - the PageRank.
Yes I am thinking of something like that.
Could you elaborate on how that would look like pseudo wise ?
Kindly
//Marcus
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Could function queries be used here? EG you could implement a
> Valu
nyone have an idea of howto implement these patterns in SOLR ?
I have never extended SOLR but am not afraid of doing so if someone pushes
me in the right direction.
Kindly
//Marcus
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
http://www.tailsweep.com/
Could an ExternalFileField help me ?
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/ExternalFileField.html
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Marcus Herou
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Confusing subject eh ? Trying to become a little clearer in a few
> sentences.
>
> We have a
gt; Please let me know the solution to do this.
>
> Thanks,
> Raju
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Custom-score-for-a-id-field-tp23197465p23197465.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Marcus Herou CTO
Hi.
I am interested in a very similar topic like yours. I want to modify the
field named "score" and the document boost but not reindex the all fields
since it would take to much power.
Please let me know if you find a solution to this.
Kindly
//Marcus
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 a
s ? Would there be a
possibilty to do some kind of join (parallell searches separate index types)
? or send the result to a separate sorting algorithm ? Hmmm Perhaps a
subclass of Sort ? Grasping at straws here folks...
Hope anyone of the core experts can help us.
Cheers
//Marcus Herou
--
Mar
st in conjunction with spell checking). If I understand
this rightly, the tokenizer must be applied to the field in the search
index (not the spell checking index). Is that correct?
Thanks,
Marcus
: For every word in
the query get some spell checking suggestions. Combine these and find
out if any of these combinations has been search for (successfully)
before. Propose the one with the highest (search) frequency. Looks
promising so far, but the "gran turismo" example won't work, since there
are too many "grand"s in the index.
Thanks,
Marcus
e case.
But even if just the documentation is wrong or unclear:
1) I could not find a case in which onlyMorePopular=false works at all.
2) It would be nice if one could get suggestion with lower frequency
than the checked word (which is, to me, what onlyMorePopular=false implies).
Thanks,
Marcus
is less frequent in the index than "grand". So if someone
searches for "grand turismo" there will be no suggestion "gran".
And to come back to my last question: There seems to be no case in which
"onlyMorePopular=false" makes sense (provided Grant's assumption is
correct). Do you see one?
Thanks,
Marcus
t all. If the
word is in the index it would not find less frequent words and if it is
not in the index onlyMorePopular=false isn't usefull since there are no
less popular words.
So if you are right this is a bug, isn't it?
Thanks,
Marcus
use a field from a different index for that (and how)? Or does the
workaround mean that I have to make two queries, one for getting the
search results and one to get spell checking results?
Thanks,
Marcus
rePopular ("grand") plus some more. Instead I get no spell check
results at all. Why is that?
Thanks,
Marcus
IndexBasedSpellChecker) didn't work for FileBasedSpellChecker.
Thanks,
Marcus
pelled" in
FileBasedSpellChecker. Is that a bug or a feature? Or are there simply
no universal rules for the format of the ouput? The differences make
parsing more difficult if you use IndexBasedSpellChecker and
FileBasedSpellChecker.
Thanks,
Marcus
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394282/solr2_maho_impression.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394376/solr_sp.png
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12393936/logo_remake.jpg
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12394264/apache_solr_
OTECTED]> wrote:
> you can try using the field collapse patch (currently in JIRA). You'll
> probably need to manually extract the patch code and apply it yourself as
> its latest update only applies to an earlier version of solr (1.3-dev).
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
:00:00 |
| 26875 | 2008-08-23 00:00:00 |
| 27356 | 2008-08-24 00:00:00 |
| 33438 | 2008-08-25 00:00:00 |
| 33102 | 2008-08-26 00:00:00 |
| 31720 | 2008-08-27 00:00:00 |
| 26133 | 2008-08-28 00:00:00 |
| 22781 | 2008-08-29 00:00:00 |
| 20198 | 2008-08-30 00:00:00 |
|20 | 2008-08-31 00:00:00 |
+-
But good! You can't imagine how many
hours I've put into this so thanks again! A 1 minute solution :)
Kindly
//Marcus
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Marcus Herou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
es works just fine, non-ascii
chars like swedish åäö etc works like a charm.
Help is really appreciated.
Kindly
//Marcus
> 16 shards: 0*, 1*, 2*... d*, e*, f*
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Marcus Herou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC
t;
> - Original Message
> > From: Marcus Herou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 3:17:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: Num docs
> >
> > Cacti, Nagios you name it already in use :)
> >
> > Well I
which then merge indices (MapReduce) for max performance and lay
them out as described above.
I think Google do something like this.
Kindly
//Marcus
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I've done this split-by-delete seve
MySQL to HBase or Hypertable.
/M
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> It sounds like you may just want to use a good server monitoring package
> that collects server data and prints out pretty charts. Then you can show
>
e schemas of concern
and a normal solr query (taken from the log):
/select
start=0&q=(title:(apple)^4+OR+description:(apple))&version=2.2&rows=15&wt=xml&sort=publishDate+desc
//Marcus
Thanks, I wanna ask the indices how much more each shard can handle before
they're considered "full" and scream for a budget to get a new machine :)
/M
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Marcus, check out the Luke request handl
Hi.
Is there a way of retrieve IndexWriter.numDocs() in SOLR ?
Kindly
//Marcus
--
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tailsweep.com/
http://blogg.tailsweep.com/
matter please let me know.
Kindly
//Marcus
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Jeremy Hinegardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This may be a bit rambling, but let see how it goes. I'm not a Lucene or
> Solr
> guru by any means, I have been prototyping with solr
something which lives as a subproject of Lucene since it
surely fills a gap that is not filled by Nutch. Nutch surely do similar
stuff but this could actually something that Nutch uses as a component to
distributed the crawled index. I will try to join the Stefan & friends team.
Kindly
//Marcus
On
ss the cluster.
Anyway this was off topic but I think my experience in building membership
aware clusters will help me in this particular case.
Kindly
//Mrcaus
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> You are headed in the rig
Thanks Ken.
I will take a look be sure of that :)
Kindly
//Marcus
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Ken Krugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> It seems a lot of what you're describing is really similar to MapReduce,
>> so I think Otis' suggestion
is nice to start playing at least on the right side of the
football field so a little push in the back would be really helpful.
Kindly
//Marcus
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:36 AM, James Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi, we have an index of ~300GB, which is at least approaching the b
Yep. I removed the "build" dir and rerun ant dist. Now it works silly me...
Anyway here's the app
http://search.tailsweep.com/searchfeeds.do?q=apple
Kindly
//Marcus
On 1/24/08, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> make sure to run "ant clean" if y
)
at com.caucho.server.port.TcpConnection.run(TcpConnection.java:514)
at com.caucho.util.ThreadPool.runTasks(ThreadPool.java:520)
at com.caucho.util.ThreadPool.run(ThreadPool.java:442)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
--
Marcus Herou Solution Architect and Java
p and
buy me a box something like this:
6-8G RAM
2 quad core ~ 2.5 MHz
4 146G scsi - RAID10'd disks
to be used as database server and I will put everything together. This will
be a good exercise for replacing all our hired servers to bought ones.
Kindly
//Marcus
On 1/23/08, Mike Kla
eep3) a mysql (slave) and activemq
server sits as well, and yes a lighttpd server. All of these guys compete
for memory, cpu (idling) and i|o. So frankly I'm out of memory on the box
(or swapping as hell).
OK I got the conclusion myself. add memory to the box and get some more
boxes :)
Kindly
/
towarming you need 2x peak memory usage. The only thing you can do
> is increase your max heap size or be careful about cache autowarming
> (possibly turning it off).
>
> cheers,
> -Mike
>
> On 21-Jan-08, at 9:44 PM, Marcus Herou wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
>
rent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
[06:25:53.877] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Help anyone?
Attaching schema.xml and solr
index a flag in that field
signals that a new index is available. The slaves regularly read this
field an pull the new index on demand.
Marcus
nge from -2^31 to 2^31-1?
And there seems to be no "unsigned" int, am i right?
Thanks
Marcus
ersions of solr.
We are going to test that in the near future.
Marcus
orning hours
(increasing the number of queries per second to 11). The index is
updated once per day on our main server and then copied to our second
server.
If you have any question I'm glad to give you further information.
Thanks to the Solr community for helping us setting up this system!
Marcus
t;Who uses Solr" thread to give you
some feedback.
Again, thank you very much!
Marcus
not all of them; our uniqueKey-field
has the same problems with sorting).
Now I am wondering why sorting works with some of the fields but not
with others. Could it be that this depends on the content?
Thanks,
Marcus
Talking about configuration and system properties: is it possible to set
the log level of Solr's logger from a system property? Or is there any
other way to change this level during the start of the servlet container?
Thanks,
Marcus
because nobody asked
for that yet? If so: I'd like to have it! ;-)
Thanks to Erik for the hint!
Marcus
ver to be started from
/some/directory/it/likes ?
If the JNDI approach gets implimented, then it should make it easy for you
to specify /etc/solr (or any other directory) as your config directory
with a one line change to your tomcat configuration.
I'm looking forward to that. :-)
Thanks,
Marcus
blem even for those people who just want to try out
solr and have no root privileges.
Marcus
stable now with nearly 11
million documents.
Thanks to all the friendly people helping me so far!
Marcus
.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:292)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:236)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:860)
Well, I don't really need this function, so just take it as an error
report.
Marcus
hen I have some results.
Marcus
s in the sample schema.xml.
Marcus
Murphy is
striking.
Thanks,
Marcus
und) perfect and it is not the way things are handled normally. But
this works fine for our needs. We gather information about changes to
our data during the day and apply them on a nightly update (which, I
know, does not imply that IDs have to change).
So, yes, I'm sure I got the right uniqueKey. ;-)
Marcus
e solr nightly builds
for test purposes.
Marcus
hat appeared suspicious to me.
Is it right, that the mergeFactor connot be changed once the index has
been built?
Marcus
oblems started
when this limit was exceeded. But maybe this is just a coincidence.
Marcus
the trick for me. The line is
360
The default value in the example installation is 3. Maybe
it wolud be a good idea to increase this, too.
Thanks,
Marcus
th other
commands (for example in a shell script)? The example in the script
"commit" in src/scripts doesn't use any special arguments with curl and
returns some seconds after submiting the request, so this doesn't seem
to work.
Thanks in advance,
Marcus
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> OK, I think I fixed this bug. Haven't added a test case yet...
In our test case everything works properly now.
Thanks for the quick bugfix!
Marcus
document can still be found in the index).
Could it be the problem is that my unique key field
is of type slong (as defined in the tutorial)?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
GMX Produkte empfehlen und ganz einfach Geld verdienen!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
after a I found the number of documents unchanged
in the stats. Furthermore the value of deletesById was 0.
Oddly enough cumulative_deletesById was 1 (what does this value
actually mean?).
Any ideas what's going wrong?
Thanks,
Marcus
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo