Strange, now I am reindexing a lot of items and have 1000 docs/sec again...

This is really, really nice, sorry for bothering...

/M

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Yes, versions of Lucene have changed, but should only be faster.  A simple
> way to see what's happening is to get the thread dump (e.g. through Solr
> admin pages) to see what the JVM is doing when things slow down.  Do a few
> dumps and see.  Perhaps the avg indexing rate is slower due to larger index
> segments?
>
>
> Otis --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Marcus Herou <marcus.he...@tailsweep.com>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 7:00:57 AM
> > Subject: Solr-1.4 indexing slower ?
> >
> > Hi.
> > We upgraded to solr-trunk (1.4-dev) for a few weeks ago and I've notices
> > that the performance really went down. Not sure if I can blame solr 100%
> > though so take these comments for what they might be (bullshit)
> >
> > However:
> > For a few months ago I know we had indexing speed of about 100 docs/sec
> per
> > shard = 800-1000 docs/sec on all shards but now we are lucky if we get
> over
> > 10 docs/sec per shard...
> >
> > This is merely an observation with very little scientific research behind
> to
> > support it since I did not profile the app before launching 1.4 to see
> how
> > good 1.3 behaved at that exact time... I launched 1.4 due to the fact
> that
> > the rumours said that date faceting was faster in solr-1.4 which I
> believe
> > it is. That's why I missed to profile indexing speed.
> >
> > Did not Lucene as well change version between the two ?
> >
> > Wondering if anyone else experience the same issues.
> >
> > //Marcus
> >
> > --
> > Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
> > +46702561312
> > marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
> > http://www.tailsweep.com/
> > http://blogg.tailsweep.com/
>
>


-- 
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
marcus.he...@tailsweep.com
http://www.tailsweep.com/
http://blogg.tailsweep.com/

Reply via email to