Re: problem with facets - out of memory exception

Have you tried to reindex using DocValues? Fields used for faceting are stored on disk and not on ram using the FieldCache. If you have enough memory they will be loaded on the system cache but not on the java heap. This is good for GC too when committing. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DocValues -

Re: Tweaking boosts for more search results variety

This is totally deprecated but maybe can be helpful if you want to re-sort some documents https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1311 -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tweaking-boosts-for-more-search-results-variety-tp4088302p4089044.html Sent from the Solr

Listeners, cores and Similarity

Hey there, I'm testing a custom similarity which loads data from and external file located in solr_home/core_name/conf/. I load data from the file into a Map on the init method of the SimilarityFactory. I would like to reload that Map every time a commit happens or every X hours. To do that I've th

Re: Solr 3.6 optimize and field cache question

Not a solution for the short term but sounds like a good use case to migrate to Solr 4.X and use DocValues instead of FieldCache for faceting. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-optimize-and-field-cache-question-tp4076398p4076822.html Sent from the Solr

about NRTCachingDirectory

I have a doubt about how NRTCachingDirectory works. As far as I've seen, it receives a delegator Directory and caches newly created segments. So, if MMapDirectory use to be the default: 1.- Does NRTCachingDirectory works acting sort of as a wrapper of MMap caching the new segments? 2.- If I have

Re: offsets issues with multiword synonyms since LUCENE_33

Well an example would be: synonyms.txt: huge,big size The I have the docs: 1- The huge fox attacks first 2- The big size fox attacks first Then if I query for huge, the highlights for each document are: 1- The huge fox attacks first 2- The big size fox attacks first The analyzer looks like this

offsets issues with multiword synonyms since LUCENE_33

Has someone noticed this problem and solved it somehow? (without using LUCENE_33 in the solrconfig.xml) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3668 Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/offsets-issues-with-multiword-synonyms-since-LUCENE-33

Re: Faceting on a date field multiple times

http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multiple-Facet-Dates-td495480.html -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceting-on-a-date-field-multiple-times-tp3961282p3961865.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: how to ignore indexing of duplicated documents?

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-ignore-indexing-of-duplicated-documents-tp3814858p3818973.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Shard timeouts on large (1B docs) Solr cluster

timeAllowed can be used outside distributed search. It is used by the TimeL¡mitingCollector. When the search time is equal to timeAllowed it will stop searching and will return the results that could find till then. This can be a problem when using incremental indexing. Lucene starts searching from

Re: Collection Distribution vs Replication in Solr

Replication is easier to manage and a bit faster. See the performance numbers: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Collection-Distribution-vs-Replication-in-Solr-tp3458724p3459178.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing li

Re: changing omitNorms on an already built index

As far as I know there's no issue about this. You have to reindex and that's it. In which kind of field are you changing the norms? (You just will see changes in text fields) Using debugQuery=true you can see how norms affect the score (in case you have them not omited) -- View this message in con

Adding a DocSet as a filter from a custom search component

Hey there, I'm wondering if there's a more clean way to to this: I've written a SearchComponent, that runs as last-component. In the prepare method I build a DocSet (SortedIntDocSet) based on if some values of the fieldCache of a determined field accomplish some rules (if rules are accomplished, se

Re: Solr 3.3. Grouping vs DeDuplication and Deduplication Use Case

Deduplication uses lucene indexWriter.updateDocument using the signature term. I don't think it's possible as a default feature to choose wich document to index, the "original" should be always the last to be indexed. /IndexWriter.updateDocument Updates a document by first deleting the document(s)

Re: Boost documents based on the number of their fields

You have different options here. You can give more boost at indexing time to the documents that have set the fields you want. For this to take effect you will have to reindex and set omitNorms="false" to the fields you are going to search. This same concept can be applied to boost single fields ins

RE: embeded solrj doesn't refresh index

Are u indexing with full import? In case yes and the resultant index has similar num of docs (that the one you had before) try setting reopenReaders to false in solrconfig.xml * You have to send the comit, of course. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/embeded-solr

Re: problem with the new IndexSearcher when snpainstaller (and commit script) happen [SOLVED]

I've found the problem in case someone is interested. It's because of the indexReader.reopen(). If it is enabled, when opening a new searcher due to the commit, this code is executed (in SolrCore.getSearcher(boolean forceNew, boolean returnSearcher, final Future[] waitSearcher)): ... if

Re: problem with the new IndexSearcher when snpainstaller (and commit script) happen

I have some more info! I've build another index bigger than the others so names of the files are not the same. This way, if I move from any of the other index to the bigger one or vicevera it works (I can see the cahnges in the version, numDocs and maxDocs)! So, I thing it is related to the name of

Re: problem with the new IndexSearcher when snpainstaller (and commit script) happen

I don't know if this could have something to do with the problem but some of the files of the indexes have same size and name (in all the index but not in the empty one). I have also realized that when moving back to the empty index and committing, numDocs and maxDocs change. Once I'm with the empt

Re: problem with the new IndexSearcher when snpainstaller (and commit script) happen

Test are done on Solr 1.4 The simplest way to reproduce my problem is having 2 indexes and a Solr box with just one core. Both index must have been created with the same schema. 1- Remove the index dir of the core and start the server (core is up with an empty index) 2- check status page of the co

problem with the new IndexSearcher when snpainstaller (and commit script) happen

Hey there, I've noticed a very odd behaviour with the snapinstaller and commit (using collectionDistribution scripts). The first time I install a new index everything works fine. But when installing a new one, I can't see the new documents. Checking the status page of the core tells me that the ind

Re: Strange performance behaviour when concurrent requests are done

That's true. But the degradation is so big. If you use lunch concurrent requests to a web app taht doesn't use Solr the time per request won't degradate that much. For me, it looks more like a synchronized is happening somewhere in Solr or Lucene and is causing this.-- View this message in context:

Re: Strange performance behaviour when concurrent requests are done

Any suggestion about this issue?-- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Strange-performance-behaviour-when-concurrent-requests-are-done-tp505478p2878758.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need to create dyanamic indexies base on different document workspaces

In case you need to create lots of indexes and register/unregister fast, there is work on the way http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-to-create-dyanamic-indexies-base-on-different-document-workspaces-tp2845919p2852410.ht

latest patches and big picture of search grouping

I need to dive into search grouping / field collapsing again. I've seen there are lot's of issues about it now. Can someone point me to the minimum patches I need to run this feature in trunk? I want to see the code of the most optimised version and what's being done in distributed search. I think

Re: Adding new field after data is already indexed

>> and i index data on the basis of these fields. Now, incase i need to add a new field, is there a way i can >> add the field without corrupting the previous data. Is there any feature which adds a new field with a >> default value to the existing records. You just have to add the new field in

Re: Adding new field after data is already indexed

>> and i index data on the basis of these fields. Now, incase i need to add a new field, is there a way i can >> add the field without corrupting the previous data. Is there any feature which adds a new field with a >> default value to the existing records. You just have to add the new field in

Core status uptime and startTime

As far as I know, in the core admin page you can find when was the last time an index had a modification and was comitted checking the lastModified. But? what startTime and uptime mean? Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Core-status-uptime-and-s

Re: Dynamically create new core

To create the core, the folder with the confs must already exist and has to be placed in the proper place (inside the solr home). Once you run the create core action, this core will we added to solr.xml and dinamically loaded. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/D

Re: How do you programatically create new cores?

You have to create the core's folder with it's conf inside the Solr home. Once done you can call the create action of the admin handler: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#CREATE If you need to dinamically create, start and stop lots of cores there's this patch, but don't know about it's curren

Re: what differents between SolrCloud and Solr+Hadoop

Well these are pretty different things. SolrCloud is meant to handle distributed search in a more easy way that "raw" solr distributed search. You have to build the shards in your own way. Solr+hadoop is a way to build these shards/indexes in paralel. -- View this message in context: http://luc

Re: Null pointer exception when mixing highlighter & shards & q.alt

I noticed that long ago. Fixed it doing in HighlightComponent finishStage: @Override public void finishStage(ResponseBuilder rb) { boolean hasHighlighting = true ; if (rb.doHighlights && rb.stage == ResponseBuilder.STAGE_GET_FIELDS) { Map.Entry[] arr = new NamedList.NamedListEnt

FieldCache.DEFAULT.getInts vs FieldCache.DEFAULT.getStringIndex. Memory usage

I need to load a FieldCache for a field wich is a solr "integer" type and has as maximum 3 digits. Let's say my index has 10M docs. I am wandering what is more optimal and less memory consumig, to load a FieldCache.DEFAUL.getInts or a FieldCache.DEFAULT.getStringIndex. The second one will have a

Re: JVM GC is very frequent.

http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/19/java-garbage-collection-boot-camp-draft/ -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/JVM-GC-is-very-frequent-tp1345760p1348065.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: maxMergeDocs and performance tuning

As far as I know, the higher you set the value, the faster the indexing process will be (because more things are kept in memory). But depending on which are your needs, it may not be the best option. If you set a high mergeFactor and you want to optimize the index once the process is done, this op

Re: ending a java app that uses EmbeddedSolrServer

Seems that coreContainer.shoutdown() solves the problem. Anyone doing it in a different way? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ending-a-java-app-that-uses-EmbeddedSolrServer-tp963573p964013.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ending an app taht uses EmbeddedSolrServer

Hey there, I've done some tests with a custom java app using EmbeddedSolrServer to create an index. It works ok and I am able to build the index but I've noticed after the commit an optimize are done, the app never terminates. How should I end it? Is there any way to tell the EmbeddedSolrServer to

Re: Recommended MySQL JDBC driver

I supose you use BatchSize=-1 to index that amount of data. Up from 5.1.7 connector there's this param: netTimeoutForStreamingResults The default value is 600. Increasing that maybe can help (2400 for example?) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Recommended-MySQL

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

>>*There are lot's of docs with the same value, I mention that because I supose that same value has nothing to do with the number of un-inverted term instances. It has to do, I've been able to reproduce teh error by setting different values to each field: HTTP Status 500 - there are more terms th

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

Thanks, that's very useful info. However can't reproduce the error. I've created and index where all documents have a multivalued date field and each document have a minimum of one value in that field. (most of the docs have 2 or 3). So, the number of un-inverted term instances is greater than the

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Hi Otis, just for curiosity, wich strategy do you use? Index in the map or reduce side? Do you use it to build shards or a single monolitic index? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/anyone-use-hadoop-solr-tp485333p919335.html Sent from the Solr - User mai

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

Well, the patch consumes the data from a csv. You have to modify the input to use TableInputFormat (I don't remember if it's called exaclty like that) and it will work. Once you've done that, you have to specify as much reducers as shards you want. I know 2 ways to index using hadoop method 1 (so

Re: solr with hadoop

I think a good solution could be to use hadoop with SOLR-1301 to build solr shards and then use solr distributed search against these shards (you will have to copy to local from HDFS to search against them) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-with-hadoop-tp48

Re: anyone use hadoop+solr?

I think there's people using this patch in production: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1301 I have tested it myself indexing data from CSV and from HBase and it works properly -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/anyone-use-hadoop-solr-tp485333p914553.ht

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

>>Well, sorting requires that all the unique values in the target field >>get loaded into memory That's what I tought, thanks. >>But a larger question is whether what your doing is worthwhile >>even as just a measurement. You say >>"This is good for me, I don't care for my tests". I claim that >>

Re: Can query boosting be used with a custom request handlers?

Maybe this helps: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#QParserPlugin -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-query-boosting-be-used-with-a-custom-request-handlers-tp884499p912691.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

Hey Erik, I am currently sorting by a multiValued. It apears a feature tha't you may not know wich of the fields of the multiValued field makes the document be in that position. This is good for me, I don't care for my tests. What I need to know if there is any performance issue in all of this. Th

Re: performance sorting multivalued field

I mean sorting the query results, not facets. I am asking because I have added a multivalued field that has as much 10 values. But 70% of the docs has just 1 or 2 fields of this multiValued field. I am not doing faceting. Since I have added the multiValued field, "java old gen" seems to get full m

performance sorting multivalued field

hey there! can someone explain me how impacts to have multivalued fields when sorting? I have read in other threads how does it affect when faceting but couldn't find any info of the impact when sorting Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/perfor

Re: how to test solr's performance?

I normally use jmeter, jconsole and iostat. Recently http://www.newrelic.com/solr.html has been released -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-test-solr-s-performance-tp881928p885025.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Question about specifying the query analysis at query time

Hey there, I am facing a problem related to query analysis and stopwords. Have some ideas how to sort it out but would like to do it in the cleanest way possible. I am using dismax and I query to 3 fields. These fields are defined as "text" this way:

Re: How well does Solr scale over large number of facet values?

Since Solr 1.4 I think the uninverted method is on by default. Anyway, you can choose wich to use with the method param: facet.method=fc/enum (where fc is the uninverted one) http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How

Re: How well does Solr scale over large number of facet values?

With the uninverted algorithm it will be very fast whatever is the number of unique terms. But be careful with the memory because it uses quite a lot. Using the oldest facet algorithm, if you have a lot of different terms it will be slow. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.

Re: Skipping duplicates in DataImportHandler based on uniqueKey

You can use deduplication to do that. Create the signature based on the unique field or any field you want. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Skipping-duplicates-in-DataImportHandler-based-on-uniqueKey-tp771559p772768.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

bug using distributed search, highlighting and q.alt

I have noticed when using q.alt even if hl=true highlights are not returned. When using distributed search, q.alt and hl, HighlightComponent.java finishStage expects the highlighting NamedList of each shard (if hl=true) but it will never be returned. It will end up with a NullPointerExcepion. I ha

bug using distributed search, highlighting and q.alt

I have noticed when using q.alt even if hl=true highlights are not returned. When using distributed search, q.alt and hl, HighlightComponent.java finishStage expects the highlighting NamedList of each shard (if hl=true) but it will never be returned. It will end up with a NullPointerExcepion. I hav

Re: MLT question

> My question is how can I paginate the results of this query? For example > instead of setting rows you must specify mlt.count in the params. But how > can I set the offset? mlt.offset? As you do in a not mlt search request, setting start param should paginate your response results blargy wrote

Re: Omitting norms question

>>Should I include not omit-norms on any fields that I would like to boost via a boost-query/function >>query? You don't have to set norms to use boost queries or functions. Just have to set them when you want to boost docs or fields at indexing time. >>What about sortable fields? Facetable field

excluder filters and multivalued fields

I don't think there's a way to do what has come to my mind but want to be sure. Let's say I have a doc with 2 fileds, one is multiValued doc1: name->john year->2009;year->2010;year->2011 And I query for: q=john&fq=-year:2010 Doc1 won't be in the matching results. Is there a way to make it appea

What does means ~2, ~3, ~4 in DisjunctionMaxQuery?

I am debuggin a 2 words query build using dismax. So it's build from DisjunctionMaxQueries being the minShouldMatch 100% and tie breaker multiplier = 0.3 +((DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:john | title:john~0.3) DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:malone | title:malone)~0.3))~2) And a 3 words one (with sa

Re: Need suggestion regarding custom transformer

I think you can handle that writing a custom transformer. There's a good explanation in the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DIHCustomTransformer KshamaPai wrote: > > Hi, > Am new to solr. > I am trying location aware search with spatial lucene in solr1.5 nightly > build. > My table in mysql

Re: Can I used .XML files instead of .OSM files

Are you sure you don't have a folder called exampledocs with xml files inside? These are the files to index as a first example: apache-solr-1.5-dev/example/exampledocs Check the /home/marc/Desktop/data/apache-solr-1.5-dev/example/solr/conf/schema.xml and solrconfig.xml and you will see how to con

Re: Error on startup

If you shut down the server propertly it's weird that you get an error when starting up again. How did you delete the index? I was experiencing something similar long time ago because I was removing the content from the index folder but not the folder itself. The correct way to do it was to remove

Re: Formatting Results

I'll give you an example about how to configure your default SearchHandler to do highlighting but I strongly recomend you to check properly the wiki. Everything is really well explained in there: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters true attr_content 200

Best performance for facet dates in trunk using solr.TrieDateField

Hey there, I am testing date facets in trunk with huge index. Aparently, as the default solrconfig.xml shows, the fastest way to run dace facets queries is index the field with this data type: I am wandering... setting precisionStep="8" to the TriedateField would improve even more the

Re: Highest frequency

As far as I know it's not suported by default. I thing you should implement your custom Lucene Similarity class and plug it into Solr via solrconfig.xml pcmanprogrammeur wrote: > > Hello all (sorry if my english is bad, i'm french) ! > > I have a Solr Index with ads which contain a title and a

Re: new/first searcher

There's no problem about having the same warming in both cases. First queries are use to warm the index once you start the solr instance. New queries warm the index once a commit in executed, for example. In first queries warming there was no previous IndexSearcher opened. In new queries there was

Why synchronized access to FieldValueCache in getUninvertedField.java

I have noticed that in the class UninvertedField.java there is a synchronized access to the FieldValueCache. I would like to know why this access is synchronized. Could this end up in a loss of performance when there are concurrent search requests? I am doing as much research as I can as I have no

Re: readOnly and concurrency performance problems

something?I am quite lost and surprised about the behaviour I have noticed... markrmiller wrote: > > Yeah it does - I take it your not on windows? > > - Mark > > http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile) > > On Feb 20, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Marc Sturlese > wrot

readOnly and concurrency performance problems

Hey there, I am experiencing concurrent performance problems in trunk. Does it open readers in readOnly mode? Thanks in advance -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/readOnly-and-concurrency-performance-problems-tp27670680p27670680.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arc

Strange performance behaviour when concurrent requests are done

Hey there, I have been doing some stress with a 2 physical CPU (with 4 cores each) server. After some reading about GC performance tunning I have configured it this way: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java -server -Xms7000m -Xmx7000m -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=10m -XX:NewSize=1000m -XX:MaxNewSize=100

scores are the same for many diferent documents

Hey there, I see that when solr gives me back the scores in the response it are the same for many different documents. I have build a simple index for testing purposes with just documents with one field indexed with standard analyzer and containing pices of text. I have done the same with a self

Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

>: bq=(*:* -field_a:54^1) >I think what you want there is bq=(*:* -field_a:54)^1 >...you are "boosting" things that don't match "field_a:54" Thanks Hoss. I've updated the Wiki, the content of the bq param was wrong: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_do_I_give_a_very_low

Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

ve boost" is usually done with boosts between 0 > and 1. For this case, maybe a boost of 0.1 is what you want? > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Marc Sturlese > wrote: >> >> I already asked about this long ago but the answer doesn't seem to >> work...

Re: how to stress test solr

I like to use JMeter with a large queries file. This way you can measure response times with lots of requests at the same time. Having JConsole opened at the same time you can check the memory status James liu-2 wrote: > > before stressing test, Should i close SolrCache? > > which tool u use? >

weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

I already asked about this long ago but the answer doesn't seem to work... I am trying to set a negative query boost to send the results that match field_a: 54 to a lower position. I have tried it in 2 different ways: bq=(*:* -field_a:54^1) bq=-field_a:54^1 None of them seem to work. W

loading an updateProcessorChain with multicore in trunk

I am testing trunk and have seen a different behaviour when loading updateProcessors wich I don't know if it's normal (at least with multicore) Before I use to use an updateProcessorChain this way: myChain It does not work in current trunk. I have debuged th

Re: solr - katta integration

have a look: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395 V SudershanReddy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can we Integrate solr with katta? > > In order to overcome the limitations of Solr in distributed search, I > need > to integrate katta with solr, without loosing any features of Solr. >

Re: Multiple Cores Vs. Single Core for the following use case

In case you are going to use core per user take a look to this patch: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores Trey-13 wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > In most cases you are going to be better off going with the userid method > unless you have a very small number of users and a very large number of > doc

Re: big index vs. lots of small ones

Check out this patch witch solve the distributed IDF's problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632 I think it fixes what you are explaining. The price you pay is that there are 2 requests per shard. If I am not worng the first is to get term frequencies and needed info and the second

Re: suggestions for DIH batchSize

If you want to retrieve a huge volume of rows you will end up with an OutOfMemoryException due to the jdbc driver. Setting batchSize to -1 in your data-config.xml (that internally will set it to Integer.MIN_VALUE) will make the query to be executed in streaming, avoiding the memory exception. Joe

tire fields and sortMissingLast

Should sortMissingLast param be working on trie-fields? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/tire-fields-and-sortMissingLast-tp26873134p26873134.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: UpdateRequestProcessor to avoid documents of being indexed

Yes, it did Cheers Chris Male wrote: > > Hi, > > Yeah thats what I was suggesting. Did that work? > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Marc Sturlese > wrote: > >> >> Do you mean something like?: >> >>@Override >>public vo

Re: UpdateRequestProcessor to avoid documents of being indexed

eers > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Sturlese > wrote: > >> >> Hey there, >> I need that once a document has been created be able to decide if I want >> it >> to be indexed or not. I have thought in implement an >> UpdateRequestProces

UpdateRequestProcessor to avoid documents of being indexed

Hey there, I need that once a document has been created be able to decide if I want it to be indexed or not. I have thought in implement an UpdateRequestProcessor to do that but don't know how to tell Solr in the processAdd void to skip the document. If I delete all the field would it be skiped or

About fsv (sort field falues)

I am tracing QueryComponent.java and would like to know the pourpose of doFSV function. Don't understand what fsv are for. Have tried some queries with fsv=true and some extra info apears in the response: But don't know what is it for and can't find much info out there. I read: // The query

Re: Sanity check on numeric types and which of them to use

And what about: vs. Wich is the differenece between both? It's just bcdint always better? Thanks in advance Yonik Seeley-2 wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Jay Hill wrote: >> 1) Is there any benefit to using the "int" type as a TrieIntField w/ >> precisionStep=0 over the "pint" ty

Re: solr+jetty logging to syslog?

With 1.4 -Add log4j jars to Solr -Configure de SyslogAppender with something like: log4j.appender.solrLog=org.apache.log4j.net.SyslogAppender log4j.appender.solrLog.Facility=LOCAL0 log4j.appender.solrLog.SyslogHost=127.0.0.1 log4j.appender.solrLog.layout=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout log4j.appe

error with multicore CREATE action

Hey there, I am using Solr 1.4 out of the box and am trying to create a core at runtime using the CREATE action. I am getting this error when executing: http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/cores?action=CREATE&name=x&instanceDir=x&persist=true&config=solrconfig.xml&schema=schema.xml&dataDir=da

distributed facet dates

Hey there, I am thinking to develope facet dates for distributed search but I don't know exacly where to start. I am familiar with facet dates source code and I think if I could undesertand how distributed facet queries work shouldn't be that difficult. I have read http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Writ

keep index in production and snapshots in separate phisical disks

Is there any way to make snapinstaller install the index in spanpshot20091023124543 (for example) from another disk? I am asking this because I would like not to optimize the index in the master (if I do that it takes a long time to send it via rsync if it is so big). This way I would just have to

Re: number of Solr indexes per Tomcat instance

hold you will suffer of slow response times. Erik_l wrote: > > We're not using multicore. Today, one Tomcat instance host a number of > indexes in form of 10 Solr indexes (10 individual war files). > > > Marc Sturlese wrote: >> >> Are you using one single solr

Re: number of Solr indexes per Tomcat instance

Are you using one single solr instance with multicore or multiple solr instances with one index each? Erik_l wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently we're running 10 Solr indexes inside a single Tomcat6 instance. > In the near future we would like to add another 30-40 indexes to every > Tomcat instance we

SOLR-1395 integration with katta. Question about Katta's ranking among shards and IDF's

Hey there, I am trying to set up the Katta integration plugin. I would like to know if Katta's ranking algorith is used when searching among shards. In case yes, would it mean it solves the problem with IDF's of distributed Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SOLR-1395-

Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues

I think it doesn't make sense to enable warming if your solr instance is just for indexing pourposes (it changes if you use it for search aswell). You could comment the caches aswell from solrconfig.xml Setting queryResultWindowSize and queryResultMaxDocsCached to sero maybe could help... (but if

Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues

Doing this you will send the dump where you want: -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/path/to/the/dump Then you can open the dump with jhat: jhat /path/to/the/dump/your_stack.bin It provably will give you a OutOfMemortException due to teh large size ofthe dump. In case you can give

DIH applying variosu transformers to a field

Hey there, I am using DIH to import a db table and and have writed a custom transformer following the example: package foo; public class CustomTransformer1{ public Object transformRow(Map row) { String artist = row.get("artist"); if (artist != null)

Best way to do a lucene matchAllDocs not using q.alt=*:*

Hey there, I need a query to get the total number of documents in my index. I can get if I do this using DismaxRequestHandler: q.alt=*:*&facet=false&hl=false&rows=0 I have noticed this query is very memory consuming. Is there any more optimized way in trunk to get the total number of documents of

Re: Optimizing a query to sort results alphabetically for a determinated field

jn Visinescu wrote: >> > >> > There's a "sortMissingLast" true/false property that you can set on >> your >> > fielType definitions in the schema. >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Marc Sturlese >> > wrote: >

Re: Optimizing a query to sort results alphabetically for a determinated field

r > fielType definitions in the schema. > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Marc Sturlese > wrote: > >> >> Hey there, I need to sort my query results alphabetically for a >> determinated >> field called "town". This field is analyzed with a KeywordAn

  1   2   3   >