Sorry...I found the answer in the comments of the previously mentioned Jira
ticket. Apparently the proposed solution differed from the final one (the
"doc" structure key is not needed, apparently).
Mike
-Original Message-----
From: Klostermeyer, Michael [mailto:
Is there any official documentation on the JSON format Solr 3.5 expects when
adding/updating documents via /update/json? Most of the official documentation
is 3.1, and I am of the understanding this changed in v3.2
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2496). I believe I have the
correc
the Tika stuff pretty easily..
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Klostermeyer, Michael
wrote:
> Well that little bit of knowledge changes things for me, doesn't it? I
> appreciate your response very much. Without knowing that about the DIH, I
> attempted to h
eficial for performance all around.
Of course if you're trying to do this with the near-real-time functionality
batching isn't your answer. But DIH isn't designed at all to work well with
NRT either...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
nts
On 3 July 2012 07:54, Klostermeyer, Michael
wrote:
> I should add that I am using the full-import command in all cases, and
> setting clean=false for the individual adds.
What does the data-import page report at the end of the full-import, i.e., how
many documents were indexed?
Are
ta when I run the SP directly.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Klostermeyer, Michael [mailto:mklosterme...@riskexchange.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 8:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: DIH - unable to ADD individual new documents
I should add that I am using the full-i
I should add that I am using the full-import command in all cases, and setting
clean=false for the individual adds.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Klostermeyer, Michael [mailto:mklosterme...@riskexchange.com]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 5:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
I am not able to ADD individual documents via the DIH, but updating works as
expected. The stored procedure that is called within the DIH returns the
expected data for the new document, Solr appears to "do its thing", but it
never makes it to the Solr server, as evidence that subsequent querie
With the help of this list, I solved a similar issue by altering my query as
follows:
Before (did not return full word matches): q=searchTerm*
After (returned full-word matches and wildcard searches as you would expect):
q=searchTerm OR searchTerm*
You can also boost the exact match by doing th
HTH,
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn't a Game.
http://www.appinions.com
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Klostermeyer, Michael
wrote:
> I am researching an issue w/ wildcard searches on complete words in 3.5
I am researching an issue w/ wildcard searches on complete words in 3.5. For
example, searching for "kloster*" returns "klostermeyer", but "klostermeyer*"
returns nothing.
The field being queried has the following analysis chain (standard
'text_general'):
IMO it would be a better (from Solr's perspective) to handle the security w/
the application code. Each query could include a "?fq=userID:12345..." which
would limit results to only what that user is allowed to see.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mike Douglass [mailto:mikeadougl...@gma
Instead of hitting the Solr server directly from the client, I think I would go
through your application server, which would have access to all the users data
and can forward that to the Solr server, thereby hiding it from the client.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Anupam Bhattacharya [
I am attempting to index a DB schema that has a many:one relationship. I
assume I would index this within Solr as a 'multivalue=true' field, is that
correct?
I am currently populating the Solr index w/ a stored procedure in which each DB
record is "flattened" into a single document in Solr. I
I'm new to Solr, but I would think the fq=[username] would work here.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq
Mike
-Original Message-
From: prakash_ajp [mailto:prakash_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Auto su
Yes, I just did this in my DIH with SQL Server 2008 and Solr 3.5; it looked
somewhat like the following:
Mike Klostermeyer
-Original Message-
From: vighnesh [mailto:svighnesh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: using storedproce
16 matches
Mail list logo
