Interesting solution.  Can you then explain to me for a given query:

?q='kloster' OR kloster*

How the "exact match" part of that is boosted (assuming the above is how you 
formulated your query)?

Thanks!

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Della Bitta [mailto:michael.della.bi...@appinions.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wildcard queries on whole words

Hi Michael,

I solved a similar issue by reformatting my query to do an OR across an exact 
match or a wildcard query, with the exact match boosted.

HTH,

Michael Della Bitta

------------------------------------------------
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn't a Game.
http://www.appinions.com


On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Klostermeyer, Michael 
<mklosterme...@riskexchange.com> wrote:
> I am researching an issue w/ wildcard searches on complete words in 3.5.  For 
> example, searching for "kloster*" returns "klostermeyer", but "klostermeyer*" 
> returns nothing.
>
> The field being queried has the following analysis chain (standard 
> 'text_general'):
>
> <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField" 
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>      <analyzer type="index">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" 
> words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" />
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>      </analyzer>
>      <analyzer type="query">
>        <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>        <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" 
> words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true" />
>        <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory" 
> synonyms="synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>        <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>      </analyzer>
> </fieldType>
>
> I see that wildcard queries are not analyzed at query time, which could be 
> the source of my issue, but I read conflicting advice on the interwebs.  I 
> read also that this might have changed in 3.6, but I am unable to determine 
> if my specific issue is addressed.
>
> My questions:
>
> 1.       Why am I getting these search results with my current config?
>
> 2.       How do I fix it in 3.5?  Would upgrading to 3.6 also "fix" my issue?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mike Klostermeyer
>

Reply via email to