any update on this guys
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:39 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using highlighting feature in solr 8.3 with default method. With
> current behaviour, main search results and highlighted results are shown in
> different blocks. Is the
it.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Hi Erick,
Is there any workaround for this?
My requirement is to move solr data from solr 6 to solr 7.
I have thought to use /replication handler to do so. But, as per the case,
the solr 6 collection has 1 shard & 1 replica and we wish to have 2 shards
and 1 replica on solr 7.
If I enable replica
for confirming that this is an issue in solr 6.6.2
Regards
Kamal Kishore.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 2:17 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Hello Kamal Kishore,
>
> Thanks for including the Solr version alongside your question! What you
>
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore.fromNormalizerMap(ManagedModelStore.java:293)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore.createNormalizerFromFeatureMap(ManagedModelStore.java:276)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore.fromLTRScoringModelMap(ManagedModelStore.java:230)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore.addModelFromMap(ManagedModelStore.java:133)\n\tat
org.apache.solr.ltr.store.rest.ManagedModelStore.applyUpdatesToManagedData(ManagedModelStore.java:162)\n\tat
Also, I can see on the collection that there is escape in double quotes in
model on model api (s/s below).
[image: image.png]
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Hi,
Is there a way to normalize the value of fieldValueFeature
and OriginalScoreFeature features within some range i.e 0-1.
Lets suppose I have 4 products with some field values, I wish to normalize
weight within 0 and 1 using func (val-min)/(max-min).
Product FieldValue Normalized Value
P1 4 1
t be? Do you have really 10 or more concurrent users, or
> users that fire up queries at exactly the same time?
>
> Can you please monitor CPU and memory?
>
> > Am 05.04.2019 um 21:42 schrieb Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
Any update on this?
Is this model running in multi threaded mode or is there is any scope to do
this. Please let me know.
Regards
Kamal
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 10:35 AM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI Jörn Franke,
>
> Thanks for the quick re
Hi Roee,
It looks the error is due to blank feature param value in the json.
"name" : "my",
"features":[],
"params" : {
I have observed that many a times solr ltr returns generic error that 'Model
type does not
exist', but later actually found to be an issue with json. Just wanted to
share
o models? How many documents? What
> is your loading pipeline? Have you observed cpu/memory?
>
> > Am 22.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to use LTR with solr 6.6.2.There ar
ween the 2 models. I am observing that Multiadditive model is taking way
higher time than linear model.
Is there a way we can improve the performance here.
Note: The size of Multiadditive model is 136 MB.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
<https://www.avast.com/en-in/recommend?utm_medium=email&utm_
any suggestions ?
Thanks in advance.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:22 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looks to me that I can modify the *SolrFeature *class, but dont know
> how to create IndexSearcher and SolrQueryRequest params as per the new
> req
*, Query originalQuery, Map
efi)
throws IOException {
return new SolrFeatureWeight(searcher, request, originalQuery, efi);
}
Regards
Kamal
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:34 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on LTR using s
modify our query using some join. But, we know join
is expensive.
Please suggest. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Any update on this.
Regards
Kamal
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:50 AM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks again Joel for your reply. I have noted your suggestions.
>
> I observed one more thing while using solrj to fetch the data using
>
than direct /export (Streaming export taking 30% less than /export).
Is this also expected ?
Regards
Kamal Kishore
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:21 AM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Yes this is correct. But keep in mind Streaming Expression has a wide range
> of features that have nothing at all
streaming expression also uses steam technique. So, are they internally
works in same fashion. Please confirm.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:51 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Jan & Joel.
>
> Though I will evaluate the performance over my data
But only if export is better
over stream.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:04 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The export handler does not do distributed search. So if you have a
> multi-shard collection you may have to use Streaming Expressions to get
> exports from all shard
/solr/guide/6_6/streaming-expressions.html
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/exporting-result-sets.html
Regards
Kamal Kishore
; if you don't specify any defType, they will be used. Though if you
> want to be explicit and specify it anyway, the value is defType=lucene
>
> Jason
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 1:05 PM Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Thanks f
n Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/6/2018 9:52 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
> >> What is the default query parser (QP) for solr.
> >>
> >> While I was reading about this, I came across two links which looks
> >> ambiguous to me. It&
[Correcting the subject]
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> What is the default query parser (QP) for solr.
>
> While I was reading about this, I came across two links which looks
> ambiguous to me. It
h are confusing me.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/the-standard-query-parser.html
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/common-query-parameters.html
Please suggest. Thanks in advance.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Any help would be appreciated.
On 12-Dec-2016 1:20 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal"
wrote:
> Any help guys ...
>
> On 09-Dec-2016 1:05 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using solr 5.4.1. Here I am using dataimport handl
Any help guys ...
On 09-Dec-2016 1:05 PM, "Kamal Kishore Aggarwal"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr 5.4.1. Here I am using dataimport handler to index data
> with SQL Server.
>
> I am using CLOB transformer to convert clob value to string. Indexing is
> working
Hi,
I am using solr 5.4.1. Here I am using dataimport handler to index data
with SQL Server.
I am using CLOB transformer to convert clob value to string. Indexing is
working fine but clob transformation is not working. Expected string value
is not coming for clob column. There is no error or exce
) for null values.
> This can be done via default value update processor factory.
> You index some placeholder token for null values.
> fq={!terms f='queryField' separator='|'}A|XX would fetche docs with A or
> null values.
> Ahmet
>
> On Friday, September
Hi,
We are using solr 5.4.1.
We are using term filter for multiple value matching purpose.
Example: fq={!terms f='queryField' separator='|'}A|B
A, B, C are the possible field values for solr field "queryField". There
can docs with null values for the same field. Now, how can I create a term
filt
t; P.S. It would help if you told us what you _did_ receive
> when you tried your options. Parse errors? All docs?
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working on solr 4.8,1. I am tryi
Hi,
I am working on solr 4.8,1. I am trying to find the docs where latlongtype
have null values.
I have tried using these, but not getting the results :
1) http://localhost:8984/solr/IM-Search/select?q.alt=-usrlatlong:[' ' TO *]
2) http://localhost:8984/solr/IM-Search/select?q.alt=-usrlatlong:[
Can anybody suggest me something..
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
> configuration has master & slave ( 2 Slaves) architecture.
details&_=1441708800450} status=0 QTime=1679
Please confirm if we our thought that increased replication time (which can
be due to servers connectivity issues) is the reason for high load on solr.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
yzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.StopFilterFactory
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Filter+Descriptions#FilterDescriptions-StopFilter
>
> HTH
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi T
type of keywords to be
shown in suggestion.
Any help is appreciated.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Solr Beginner
Hi,
Anybody tried upgrading master first prior to slave Java upgrade. Please
suggest.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2015 12:21 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal wrote:
> > I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
> >
Hi,
I am currently working with Java-1.7, Solr-4.8.1 with tomcat 7. The solr
configuration has slave & master architecture. I am looking forward to
upgrade Java from 1.7 to 1.8 version in order to take advantage of memory
optimization done in latest version.
So, I am confused if I should upgrade
Hi,
As per this article, the linux machine is preferred to have 1.5 times RAM
with respect to index size. So, to verify this, I tried testing the solr
performance in different volumes of RAM allocation keeping other
configuration (i.e Solid State Drives, 8 core processor, 64-Bit) to be same
in bot
AM, Apoorva Gaurav
wrote:
> Hey Kamal,
> What all config changes have you done to establish replication of external
> files and how have you disabled role reloading?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
URLClassLoader.java:355)
Please help.
Regrads
Kamal Kishore
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> Uncommitted code may not work.
>
> Have you considered using
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/UIMA+Integration
>
>
>
a/solr-4.8.1/; -> Downloaded
all four files from issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899; -> patch -p0
-i LUCENE-2899.patch Getting the following error: can't find file to patch
at input line 5 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
I am failing :(. Please help.
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Hi All,
It was found that external file, which was getting replicated after every
10 minutes was reloading the core as well. This was increasing the query
time.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> With
lin Shekhar Mangar <
> shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This might be related:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3514
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
>> kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
has
> > become slow. The solr query time has also increased.
> >
> > Can anybody confirm me if these issues are because of this
> implementation.
> > Is that memory does EFF eats up?
> >
> > Regards
> > Kamal Kishore
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
at core/data/external_eff_views location.
Thanks & Regards
Kamal Kishore
Any replies ??
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have recently implemented EFF in solr. There are about 1.5
> lacs(unsorted) values in the external file. After this implementation, the
> server has
memory does EFF eats up?
Regards
Kamal Kishore
Even after making the same java version, it is not working. I am using
java.runtime.version:1.7.0_55-b13
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:05 PM, rulinma wrote:
> normal, rewrite filter.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Custom-filter-not-working-wi
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Shawn for quick reply.
>
> I am trying to change the code (removing the errors from the code shown in
> image) & will test the filter after that & will update here.
>
>
"}),0,0,1,15))&ql3="laundry services".
But this is reporting the following error:
"msg":"org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Expected ',' at position 69 in
'map(query({!dismax qf=titlex v=$ql3 pf=\"\"}),0,0,1,map(query({!dismax
qf=city v='\"mumbai\"' pf=\"\"}),0,0,1,15))'",
Regards
Kamal Kishore
8.45"
I am posting following doc value to solr.
With Thanks & Regards
Kamal Kishore
Thanks Shawn for quick reply.
I am trying to change the code (removing the errors from the code shown in
image) & will test the filter after that & will update here.
Thanks
Kamal Kishore
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 1:10 AM, Kamal Kisho
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I have created a custom filter factory for solr 4.2. It is working good.
> But w
I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
more detail.
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am new to solr. I am not getting your answer. Can you please explain in
> more detail.
>
>
> On
Dear Team,
I am new to solr. Please subscribe me for solr mails.
With Regards & Thanks
Kamal Kishore
:
'org.apache.lucene.analysis.ExtendedNameFilterFactory'
Here's the java code :http://pastebin.com/REu6cJxR,
http://pastebin.com/380YZaAM
It was working good with solr 4.2. Can anybody tell me the changes that I
need to make for running it in solr 4.7.1?
With Regards & Thanks
Kamal Kishore
Any updates guys ?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Kamal Kishore
wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I have two solr cores. One containing products information and second has
> customers points. I am looking at solr join to query on first product core
> & boost the results based on
NO reply from anybody..seems strange ?
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Kamal Kishore
wrote:
> Any updates guys ?
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Kamal Kishore > wrote:
>
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> I have two solr cores. One containing products information a
wing to get data from both the core.
With RegardsK
Kamal Kishore
--
-
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.indiamart.m>
Follow IndiaMART.com <http://www.indiamart.com/> for latest updates on this
and more: <https://plus.google.com/+indiamart>
<https://w
58 matches
Mail list logo