Hi All,

It was found that external file, which was getting replicated after every
10 minutes was reloading the core as well. This was increasing the query
time.

Thanks
Kamal Kishore



On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
kkroyal....@gmail.com> wrote:

> With the above replication configuration, the eff file is getting
> replicated at core/conf/data/external_eff_views (new dir data is being
> created in conf dir) location, but it is not getting replicated at 
> core/data/external_eff_views
> on slave.
>
> Please help.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
> kkroyal....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your guidance Alexandre Rafalovitch.
>>
>> I am looking into this seriously.
>>
>> Another question is that I facing error in replication of eff file
>>
>> This is master replication configuration:
>>
>> core/conf/solrconfig.xml
>>
>> <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" >
>>>     <lst name="master">
>>>         <str name="replicateAfter">commit</str>
>>>         <str name="replicateAfter">startup</str>
>>>         <str name="confFiles">../data/external_eff_views</str>
>>>     </lst>
>>> </requestHandler>
>>
>>
>> The eff file is present at core/data/external_eff_views location.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
>> shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This might be related:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3514
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Kamal Kishore Aggarwal <
>>> kkroyal....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Team,
>>> >
>>> > I have recently implemented EFF in solr. There are about 1.5
>>> lacs(unsorted)
>>> > values in the external file. After this implementation, the server has
>>> > become slow. The solr query time has also increased.
>>> >
>>> > Can anybody confirm me if these issues are because of this
>>> implementation.
>>> > Is that memory does EFF eats up?
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Kamal Kishore
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to