formachine? What is the maximum size of index you use for HD? Are
you using theSORL or lucene? How many instance you have the SOLR server on
each machine?
Sorry for so many questions.
Gustavo Maia
2011/2/4 Otis Gospodnetic
> Gustavo,
>
> I haven't used RMI in 5 years, but last ti
only necessary to add more machines?
2011/2/4 Ganesh
> I am having similar kind of problem. I need to scale out. Could you explain
> how you have done distributed indexing and search using Lucene.
>
> Regards
> Ganesh
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gus
having 6 instances of SORL server?
Another question would be if the SOLR would have some limiting size index
for Hard drive? It would be interesting not index too big because when the
index increased the longer the search.
Thanks for everything.
Gustavo Maia
Hello,
I am doing a comparative study between Lucene and Solr and wish to obtain
more concrete data on the data transfer using the lucene RemoteSearch that
uses RMI and data transfer of SOLR that uses the HTTP protocol.
Gustavo Maia
Try it.
ulimit -n20
2011/2/3 Grijesh
>
> best option to use
> true
>
> decreasing mergeFactor may cause indexing slow
>
> -
> Thanx:
> Grijesh
> http://lucidimagination.com
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Open-Too-Many-Files-tp2406289p2412415.
2011/2/2 Gustavo Maia
> Hello,
>
> Let me give a brief description of my scenario.
> Today I am only using Lucene 2.9.3. I have an index of 30 million
> documents distributed on three machines and each machine with 6 hds (15k
> rmp).
> The server queries the search index u
Hello,
Let me give a brief description of my scenario.
Today I am only using Lucene 2.9.3. I have an index of 30 million documents
distributed on three machines and each machine with 6 hds (15k rmp).
The server queries the search index using the remote class search. And each
machine is made to sea
