. And use docValues for faster sort too.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 9 Feb 2015 4:33 am, "Flavio Pompermaier" wrote:
>
> > In my use case it could be very helpful because I use the SIREn plugin to
> > index arbitrary JSON-LD and this plugin automatically in
p bring the issue forward
> by submitting patches.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> > 9. feb. 2015 kl. 12.15 skrev Flavio Pompermaier :
> >
> > Do I have to vote for it..?
> >
> > On Mon,
Do I have to vote for it..?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2522
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> > 9. feb. 2015 kl. 10.30 skrev Flavio Pompermaier
ome use cases. I'll need to check
> if Solr functions support such a thing.
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Flavio Pompermaier
> wrote:
>
> > I saw that this is possible in Lucene (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5454) and also in
> > Elast
c in nature.
>
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Flavio Pompermaier
> wrote:
>
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > Is there any possibility that in the near future Solr could support
> sorting
> > on multivalued fields?
> >
> > Best,
> > Flavio
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> http://about.me/anshumgupta
>
Hi to all,
Is there any possibility that in the near future Solr could support sorting
on multivalued fields?
Best,
Flavio
Sorry for dumb question but how do you integrate ActiveMQ and Solr? What is
the purpos/use case?
Thanks, in advance,
Flavio
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:00 PM, vivison wrote:
> Solr works fine with ActiveMQ provided a good solrconfig.xml. I was
> omitting
> the required property "java.naming.prov
In which sense fields and types are now deprecated in schema.xml? Where can
I found any pointer about this?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> 28 April 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.8.0 available
>
> The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.8.0
>
> Solr is th
Sorry,
I found the error myself..I need to specify configName as paramete rof
setCollectionConfigName():
createRequest.setCollectionConfigName(configName);
Best,
Flavio
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> Hi to everybody,
>
> I'm trying to creat
Hi to everybody,
I'm trying to create a collection programmatically instead of doing via
http.
Is that possible? I found around to use something like
CoreAdminRequest.Create createRequest = new CoreAdminRequest.Create();
createRequest.setCoreName(coreName);
createRequest.setCollectionConfigName
So there may be a slight difference in when documents are visible.
> You'll probably never notice.
>
> If you issue commits from a client, then the commit is propagated
> to all nodes in the cluster.
>
> HTH,
> Erick
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Flavio Pom
nts won't be visible to search until
> you do a commit however.
>
Yeah, now it is more clear. Still a question: for my client is not a
problem to soft commit but, are the modifications also sent to replicas
with this kind of commits?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22
Hi to all,
we're migrating from solr 3.x to solr 4.x to use Solrcloud and I have two
big doubts:
1) External fields. When I compute such a file do I have to copy it in the
data directory of shards..? The external fields boosts the results of the
query to a specific collection, for me it doesn't m
, Flavio Pompermaier
wrote:
> Any help..? Is it possible to add this pagerank-like behaviour?
>
>
Any help..? Is it possible to add this pagerank-like behaviour?
Hi to everybody,
in my index I have location names and I'd like to give boost to those that
are more referred to in other documents. For example, if I query document
by "name:London", I'd like to give more boost to those ids that are most
referred in other fields of documents (e.g. city=1234), that
What was the problem..?
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:33 PM, AdityaR wrote:
> I was able to get the setup to work.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Cloud-Setup-tp4080182p4081434.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I find this article very interesting about cloud deployment:
http://myjeeva.com/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment.html
Best,
Flavio
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I'd advise you to tear it down and start over. You should be
> creating new _collections_, no
gt; sometimes called "oversharding"
> or
> 2> use the splitShard capabilities in very recent Solrs to expand
> capacity.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Flavio Pompermaier
> wrote:
> > Hi to all,
> > Probably this question ha
Hi to all,
Probably this question has a simple answer but I just want to be sure of
the potential drawbacks..when I run SolrCloud I run the main solr instance
with the -numShard option (e.g. 2).
Then as data grows, shards could potentially become a huge number. If I
hadstio to restart all nodes and
model a "bad
> model" that needs fix. It's a possible model and who knows, maybe other
> model could perform better. It's like in the case of an algorithm, we
> should assume we can always do better...
>
> Best regards,
> Marcelo.
>
>
> 2013/7/11 Flavio
I also have a similar scenario, where fundamentally I have to retrieve all
urls where a userid has been found.
So, in my schema, I designed the url as (string) key and a (possible huge)
list of attributes automatically mapped to strings.
For example:
Url1 (key):
- language: en
- content:userid1
s confusing you I think is
> the distinction between SolrCloud and Solr Master/Slave.
> SolrCloud is the new way of doing things. Master/Slave
> is a situation in where all the automatic stuff you can do with
> SolrCloud must be done manually, things like assigning
> documents to p
Hi to all,
I started following this mailing list about 1 month ago and I read many
threads about SolrCloud and distributed Solr. I just want to check if I
understood correctly and, if so, ask for some architectural decision I have
to take:
1) At the moment, in order to design a scalable Solr dep
ke
> "keywordTokenizerFactory" you also won't get your URL split up into pieces.
> And in that case you can also normalize the values with something like
> lowerCaseFilter which you can't do with "string" types since they're
> completely unanalyzed.
&g
ht or am I missing something else?
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> If there is a bug... we should identify it. What's a sample post command
> that you issued?
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Flavio Pompermaier
>
etc. It's invaluable!
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> P.S. Feel free to un-check the "verbose" box, it provides lots
> of information but can be overwhelming, especially at first!
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Flavio Pompermaier
> wrote:
> > Ok
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> > So, in order to achieve that feature I have to declare my fileds
> > (authorid
> > and itemid) with termVectors="true" termPositions="true"
> > termOffsets="false
new field telling you how many times the
> term 1000 appears in the authorid field for each document.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 09:34 AM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote:
> > Hi to everybody,
> > I have some multiValued (single-token) field, for example autho
hieve that result?
Best,
Flavio
--
Flavio Pompermaier
*Development Department
*___
*OKKAM**Srl **- www.okkam.it*
*Phone:* +(39) 0461 283 702
*Fax:* + (39) 0461 186 6433
*Email:* f.pomperma...@okkam.it
*Headquarters:* Trento (Italy), fraz. Villazzano,
r can query by a URL fragment,
> such as "apache.org", ".org", "lucene.apache.org", etc. and the
> tokenization will strip out the punctuation.
>
> I'll add this script to my list of examples to add in the next rev of my
> book.
>
>
> --
g
> Subject: Re: URL search and indexing
>
> Probably a good match for the RegExp feature of Solr (given that your url
> is not tokenized)
> e.g. q=url:/.*\.it$/
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> 25. juni 2013 kl. 12:
-1/ebook/product-21079719.html>
>
> But... I still think you should use a tokenized text field as well - use
> all three: raw string, tokenized text, and URL classification fields.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Flavio Pompermaier
> Sent: Tuesda
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> 25. juni 2013 kl. 14:10 skrev Flavio Pompermaier :
>
> > Sorry but maybe I miss something here..could I declare url as key field
> and
> > query it too..?
> > At the moment, my schema
www.cominvent.com
>
> 25. juni 2013 kl. 12:17 skrev Flavio Pompermaier :
>
> > Hi to everybody,
> > I'm quite new to Solr so maybe my question could be trivial for you..
> > In my use case I have to index stuff contained in some URL so i use url
> as
> > key
mesite.com, what's the best strategy? I tought to made a URL to path
transfromation and indexed using solr.PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory but
maybe there's a simpler solution..isn't it?
Best,
Flavio
--
Flavio Pompermaier
*Development Department
*__
36 matches
Mail list logo
