Ok, done :) On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> Sure, vote for it. Number of votes do not directly make prioritized sooner. > So you better also add a comment to the JIRA, it will raise committer's > attention. > Even better of course is if you are able to help bring the issue forward > by submitting patches. > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > 9. feb. 2015 kl. 12.15 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>: > > > > Do I have to vote for it..? > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > wrote: > > > >> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2522 > >> > >> -- > >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > >> > >>> 9. feb. 2015 kl. 10.30 skrev Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it > >: > >>> > >>> In my use case it could be very helpful because I use the SIREn plugin > to > >>> index arbitrary JSON-LD and this plugin automatically index also all > >> nested > >>> attributes as a Solr field. > >>> Thus I need for example to gather all entries with a certain value of > the > >>> "type" attribute, ordered by "name" (but name could be a multivalued > >>> attribute in my use case :( ) > >>> I'd like to avoid to switch to Elasticsearch just to have this single > >>> feature. > >>> > >>> Thanks for the support, > >>> Flavio > >>> > >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Sure, that's correct and makes sense in some use cases. I'll need to > >> check > >>>> if Solr functions support such a thing. > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < > >> pomperma...@okkam.it> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I saw that this is possible in Lucene ( > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5454) and also in > >>>>> Elasticsearch. Or am I wrong? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Unless I'm missing something here, sorting on a multi-valued field > >>>> would > >>>>> be > >>>>>> non-deterministic in nature. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < > >>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi to all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is there any possibility that in the near future Solr could support > >>>>>> sorting > >>>>>>> on multivalued fields? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Flavio > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Anshum Gupta > >>>> http://about.me/anshumgupta > >>>> > >> > >> > >
