;
>
> On 30 January 2013 17:09, Erik Holstad wrote:
>
> > Hey!
> >
> > Been playing around with Suggester and things are working just fine,
> > but I have a use case where it would be really helpful to return some
> meta
> > data
> > for each s
Ok, thanks Ryan!
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Erik Holstad wrote:
>
> Thanks for the help Ryan!
>> Using the start.jar with 1.3 and added the slf4j jar to the classpath.
>> When
>
Thanks for the help Ryan!
Using the start.jar with 1.3 and added the slf4j jar to the classpath. When
it comes to the setting up
of the log4j I wonder which method is better. To put the redirect to the log
server in the Jetty.xml file
or to put a log4j.properties file in the web library, and if it'
I kind if remember hearing that Solr was using SLF4J for the logging, but
I haven't been able to find any information about it. And in that case where
do you set it to redirect to you log4j server for example?
Regards Erik
iki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> > When doing a search we want to have a have parameters that we set of how
> to
> > boost different
> > scores. for
Hi!
When doing a search we want to have a have parameters that we set of how to
boost different
scores. for example we want to have the ability to boost newer items in some
case and in some not,
like a sliding scale from only time to only relevancy.
What is the best way of doing this, using Solrj?
chema.xml
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> > When making a query using the web interface the we get the expected
> > OR function. But when using the java client it look like it is treating
> the
Hi!
When making a query using the web interface the we get the expected
OR function. But when using the java client it look like it is treating the
query as an AND query.
Is there way to see what operator is used for the query using Solrj?
Regards Erik
larity should be stored with termVectors=true and
> stored=true.
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Bruce Ritchie
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Holstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 9:46 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Hi!
Have been going though the documentation for the more like this/these
feature
but haven't found anything about how to use it in Solrj.
Regards Erik
> We send it a normal kill, wait 30 seconds, then use a "kill -9". This means
> we tell it to shut down, give it thirty seconds to do whatever it wants to,
> then forcefully kill it. I'm not sure we have ever seen the first 'normal
> kill' work, but
mes and see
> it any threads are blocking and where.
> The 2-minute pause smells like a network timeout of some kind.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi!
We are having this weird issue when killing a running instance of Solr and
then trying to
restart it right away.
We just switched from one machine to another and on the old one everything
works fine.
When turning off Solr you can restart it right away with no problem. But on
the new one
the fi
r all
the mappers and this seems to work fine even for more than 3 mappers.
Regards Erik
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is exactly what we are doing now added all the documents to the server
> in the Map phase of the job and send t
t;
> > > Not answering your question directly, but how many cores does your Solr
> > > machine have? If it has 2 cores, for example, then running 6 indexers
> > > against it likely doesn't make indexing faster.
> > >
> > > Otis
> &g
looks like a nightly, but from
> when)? What did you set auto-commit to be? Can you provide the full stack
> trace? Also, were you starting fresh when you got the second exception?
>
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Erik Holstad wrote:
>
> We are using Solr out of the box,
gt; Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:24:51 PM
> > Subject: java.i
We are using Solr out of the box, with only a couple of changes in the
solconfig file.
We are running a MapReduce job to import into Solr. Every map creates one
document and used to
add and commit it to Solr. We got org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
Error_opening_new_searcher_exceeded_limit_of
Hi!
I want to do a query that first queries on one specific field and
for all those that match the input do a second query.
For example if we have a "type" field where one of the options
is "user" and a "title" fields includes the names of the users.
So I want to find all data with "type" field =
Never mind :)
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm trying to add multiple documents to the server at the same time,
> and it works fine when I know how many I want to add, cause than I
> can create that man SolrInputDoc
Hi!
I'm trying to add multiple documents to the server at the same time,
and it works fine when I know how many I want to add, cause than I
can create that man SolrInputDocuments to store them in.
But if I don't know the total number in advance, is there a good way
of doing this, since reusing one
Thanks a lot!!
Regards Erik
Thanks for the quick reply!
I thought that 8983 only was for the web interface, but that
is not the case?
Regards Erik
Hi!
I'm trying to use solrj to work with solr and tried the example on
http://e-mats.org/tag/solrj/
but I get this error message:
Sep 1, 2008 9:49:09 AM org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector
executeWithRetry
INFO: I/O exception (java.net.ConnectException) caught when processing
request:
24 matches
Mail list logo
