Otis, The machine we are running on has 4 cores, and that seems to make sense, since running for inserters also failed. So what you are saying is that one inserter uses 1 core? So we can only have as many methods calling the commit() as we have cores?
Regards Erik On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik, > > Not answering your question directly, but how many cores does your Solr > machine have? If it has 2 cores, for example, then running 6 indexers > against it likely doesn't make indexing faster. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Erik Holstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:24:51 PM > > Subject: java.io.IOException: cannot read directory > org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/home/solr/src/apache-solr-nightly/example/solr/data/index: > list() returned null > > > > We are using Solr out of the box, with only a couple of changes in the > > solconfig file. > > > > We are running a MapReduce job to import into Solr. Every map creates one > > document and used to > > add and commit it to Solr. We got org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: > > > Error_opening_new_searcher_exceeded_limit_of_maxWarmingSearchers4_try_again_later, > > which we solved by removing the commit statment from the MR job and added > > auto-commit in solrconfig. > > > > We reran the job and got another exception: java.io.IOException: cannot > read > > directory > > org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@ > /home/solr/src/apache-solr-nightly/example/solr/data/index: > > list() returned null > > followed by: SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: > Lock > > obtain timed out: SingleInstanceLock: write.lock > > > > This was happening when the number of mappers writing to solr was 6, we > > lowered the number of inputters to 3 and everything worked fine. > > > > Does anyone know what happens, and how we can use more than 3 input > sources > > at the same time? > > > > Regards Erik > >
