-component.html#solrj-and-the-term-vector-component
Thanks,
Deepu
Hi All,
Any suggestions on below observation, can i use Char Filter to retain old
behavior of Standard Tokenizer ?
Thanks,
Deepu
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 4:59 PM Deepu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are in process of migrating from Solr 5 to solr 8, during testing
> observed that Standa
same behavior in solr 8 also, as we are using white space
tokenizer to index Emojis and standard tokenizer to remove them now both
are behaving the same.
Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Deepu
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for taking time and replay.
Thanks,
Deepu
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:53 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/25/2020 10:42 AM, Deepu wrote:
> > We are in the process of migrating from Solr 5 to Solr 8, during testing
> > identified that "Not null" queries on
issue?
Thanks
Deepu
Dear Team,
Any suggestions on below observation?
Thanks & Regards,
Deepu
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 7:57 PM Deepu wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am using Solr document centric external version configuration to control
> concurrent updates.
> Followed sample configuration given i
true
_external_version_
_external_version_
live_b
false
update_timestamp_tdt
I am using Solr version : 8.6.1 and Solrj version : 8.4.0
Thanks,
Deepu
:{
"metadata":[
"error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException",
"root-error-class","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException"],
"msg":"The configuration sampleConfigSet already exists in zookeeper",
"code":400}}
how we re upload same config with few schema & solr config changes ?
Thanks,
Deepu
Hi All,
i am trying to use {!complexphrasequeryparser inOrder=true} along with
other text fields. i am using solrj client to initiate the request.
sample query is
"{!complexphrase inOrder=true}(all_text_txt_enus:\"by\\ test*\") AND
(({!terms f=product_id_l}959945,959959,959960,959961,959962,95996
there a way we can get actual distance solr calculated w.r.t specific
document and specific field ?
Thanks in advance !!
Thanks,
Pradeep
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Deepu wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We have 8 text fields (*_txt_en) in schema and one multi valued text field
> whic
>
> If you want to match prefixes, edge n-grams are a better approach.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Apr 13, 2020, at 2:35 PM, Deepu wrote:
> >
> > Hi Team,
> >
> >
Hi Team,
We have 8 text fields (*_txt_en) in schema and one multi valued text field
which is copy field of other text fields, like below.
tittle_txt_en, configuration_summary_txt_en, all_text_txt_ens (multi value
field)
Observed one issue with Fuzzy match, same term with distance of two(~2) is
w
12 matches
Mail list logo