Corrected Typo mistake. Hi Team,
We have 8 text fields (*_txt_en) in schema and one multi valued text field which is copy field of other text fields, like below. tittle_txt_en, configuration_summary_txt_en, all_text_txt_ens (multi value field) Observed one issue with Fuzzy match, same term with distance of two(~2) is working on individual fields but not returning any results from multi valued field. Term we used is "probl" and document has "problem" term in two text fields, so all_text field has two occurrences of 'problem" terms. title_txt_en:probl~2. (given results) all_text_txt_ens:probl~2 (no results) is there any other factors involved in distance calculation other than Damerau-Levenshtein Distance algoritham? what might be the reason same input with same distance worked with one field and failed with other field in same collection? is there a way we can get actual distance solr calculated w.r.t specific document and specific field ? Thanks in advance !! Thanks, Pradeep On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:35 PM Deepu <kpkumar1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > We have 8 text fields (*_txt_en) in schema and one multi valued text field > which is copy field of other text fields, like below. > > tittle_txt_en, configuration_summary_txt_en, all_text_txt_ens (multi value > field) > > Observed one issue with Fuzzy match, same term with distance of two(~2) is > working on individual fields but not returning any results from multi > valued field. > > Term we used is "prob" and document has "problem" term in two text fields, > so all_text field has two occurrences of 'problem" terms. > > > > title_txt_en:prob~2. (given results) > > all_text_txt_ens:prob~2 (no results) > > > > is there any other factors involved in distance calculation other > than Damerau-Levenshtein Distance algoritham? > > what might be the reason same input with same distance worked with one > field and failed with other field in same collection? > > is there a way we can get actual distance solr calculated w.r.t specific > document and specific field ? > > > > Thanks in advance !! > > > Thanks, > > Pradeep >
