You can use filter query (fq) to limit your results:
>
> fq=tag:sometag&q=user_input_here
>
>
> Have a look at dismax and standard query documentation on the wiki.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
hello all,
I would like to combine the DisMaxRequestHandler for processing user
searches, but I would like the -aditionally- add more query
parameters.
For example, the user want to search inside all the documents tagged
with one particular tag (a tag he clicked).
So, I would like to define: reg
Hello All,
It looks like all my tests with solr have been very conclusive: it's the way
to go.
Sadly enough, me nor our sysadmin have any experience with setting up
tomcat, jetty, orion, .
We have plenty of experience with other servers like lighttpd and apache,
but that doesn't particularly help
> we can start having more explict structured info
> about all of the concepts that are really "core" to how a param works (ie:
> name, datatype, is it multivalued, can it be overridden per field, what
> is/are the value(s) used for).
defaults as well, please
Structured information per param
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Sean Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can take a stab at this. I need to see why SOLR-502 isn't working for
> Otis first though.
I slightly "enhanced" my script so it would only do the strange
searches my users have done in the past... (i.e things with more than
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. Fault tolerance good. ParseExceptions bad.
>
> Can you open a JIRA issue for it? If you feel you see the problem, a patch
> would be great, too.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-589
I hope the bug report
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Sean Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that the DisMaxRequestHandler tries hard to handle any query that
> the user can throw at it.
That's exactly why I was reporting it... :-)
- Bram
> Use smaller caches unless you need bigger ones for some reason.
>
> class="solr.search.LRUCache"
> size="65536"
> initialSize="16384"
> autowarmCount="16384"/>
>
> If you aren't faceting, I'd make this smaller.
I'm faceting quite heavily... My plan is to give the user a ta
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But are you sure you're not just masking the problem? That is, your limit
> may now be 90,000 queries...
>
> I always assume this kind of thing is a memory leak somewhere, have you
> any tools to monitor your memory consum
w the processes information with the java processes ?
>
> above
> Chris
>
> 2008/6/2 Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> Still running tests on solr using the example jetty container. I've
>> been getting nice
Hello all,
Still running tests on solr using the example jetty container. I've
been getting nice performance. However, suddenly between 15400 and
15600 queries, I get a very serious drop in performance, and this
every time I run my test, independent of what I'm searching for. The
performance STAY
hello all,
just a small note to say that the dismax query parser crashes on:
q = "apple -- pear"
I'm running through a stored batch of my users' searches and it went
down on the double dash :)
- Bram
--
http://freesound.iua.upf.edu
http://www.smartelectronix.com
http://www.musicdsp.org
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : For date faceting, count missing the order doesn't matter either, and
> : there it's given as a comma-separated list.
>
> Either you are mistaken, or i don't understand your statement. date
> faceting works just like
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been paying close attention to the uniformity of URL parameters,
> but if there is room for making them more uniform
> (e.g. always use singular, always use comma as a delimiting character, etc.)
> without hu
hello all,
a while ago I was looking into making the schema for my (rather rich)
data set, and I wanted to have a field for username.
I would need a case insensitive string for that, but literal (no
tokenizing, ...).
how can I do this within the Solr schema definition?
- bram
--
http://freeso
Hello Eric (and others)
>>
>> repeating the parameter:
>> sort=field1,field2 desc,field3
>> but
>> facet.field=field1&facet.field=field2
>> This is pretty confusing to first-hand users! :-)
>
> Yeah, it is confusing. But we have to be careful with order. I don't
> believe you can rely on the or
hello all,
a new user here. I will be using solr to power the search over at
freesound ( http://freesound.iua.upf.edu ).
been experimenting with solr and it's damned cool :)
here we go:
1. I have a minor remark about the inconsistencies in the
query-parameter definitions... Sometimes multiple
17 matches
Mail list logo
