On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : For date faceting, count missing the order doesn't matter either, and > : there it's given as a comma-separated list. > > Either you are mistaken, or i don't understand your statement. date > faceting works just like field faceting -- no comma seperated lists.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#head-aaf1cd9feb4cbaa5a156e318a469eb023574e7f4 Now I'm doubting as well: this doesn't say "comma separated list" > I'm adamantly opposed to adding any new params that have special > "splitting" rules -- it imposes arbitrary and unneccessarsy limitations on > the values thta you can pass to those params (unless you also have some > "escaping" mechanism for the split character, but that just gets messy). > x-url-form-encoding supports multivalued params for a reason. I wasn't saying that this is very important, I was just poitning out that for a newbie, there is a certain confusion when it comes to "one thing with comma a separated list, the other can have multiple values". This could also be solved perfectly in the wiki (i.e. making it very clear multiple GET params with the same name can be used, or if a comma-separated list should be used). > The only reason *any* existing solr params use comma or white space <snip> Hehe, thanks for the historical background. Always cool to read :) - bram -- http://freesound.iua.upf.edu http://www.smartelectronix.com http://www.musicdsp.org
