Re: ParseException : Unable to index date in ISODate("2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z") format in SOLR 5.4.1

2019-05-10 Thread Walter Underwood
"2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z” is an ISO 8601 date. "ISODate("2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z”)” is not an ISO 8601 date. If you could post what is being sent to Solr, that would be helpful. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On May 10, 2019, at 7:09

Re: ParseException : Unable to index date in ISODate("2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z") format in SOLR 5.4.1

2019-05-10 Thread Erick Erickson
Well, the thing you’re getting back from MongoDB isn’t the ISO date format. I don’t know enough about MongoDB to understand how to get it to spit out the date in the correct format, but that’s where you need to look. Best, Erick > On May 10, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Abhijit Pawar wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: What determines which logging settings are available?

2019-05-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/10/2019 4:26 PM, Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote: We are wanting to tweak the logging levels of our Solr 7.4 nodes to see what might be helpful to add to the solr.log for debugging purposes. In investigating what is available, however, I run /solr/admin/info/logging and I find that

What determines which logging settings are available?

2019-05-10 Thread Oakley, Craig (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
We are wanting to tweak the logging levels of our Solr 7.4 nodes to see what might be helpful to add to the solr.log for debugging purposes. In investigating what is available, however, I run /solr/admin/info/logging and I find that there is little consistency in what logging settings are availa

ParseException : Unable to index date in ISODate("2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z") format in SOLR 5.4.1

2019-05-10 Thread Abhijit Pawar
Hello, I am trying to index date in ISODate format like this saved in mongoDB collection using DataImortHandler in SOLR 5.4.1: { . . "endDate" : ISODate("2019-03-12T21:53:16.841Z") } It throws below error: *java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: "Tue Mar 12 21:53:16 UTC 2019"* Below is the

Re: Softer version of grouping and/or filter query

2019-05-10 Thread Doug Reeder
Thanks much! I dropped price from the fq term, changed to an edismax parser, and boosted with bq=price:[150+TO+*]^100 On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 7:21 AM Edward Ribeiro wrote: > Em qua, 8 de mai de 2019 18:56, Doug Reeder > escreveu: > > > > > Similarly, we have a filter query that only returns p

Performance of /export requests

2019-05-10 Thread Justin Sweeney
Hi, We are currently working on a project where we are making heavy use of /export in Solr in order to stream data back. We have an index with about 16 fields that are all docvalues fields and any number of them may be requested to be streamed in results. Our index has ~450 million documents sprea

Re: Solr 8.0.0 error: cannot change field from index options=DOCS to inconsistent index options=DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS

2019-05-10 Thread Erick Erickson
I suspect that perhaps some defaults have changed? So I’d try changing the definition in the schema for that field. These changes should be pointed out in the upgrade notes in Lucene or Solr CHANGES.txt. Best, Erick > On May 10, 2019, at 1:17 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen > wrote: > > Hi list, >

Writing unit tests to test complex solr queries

2019-05-10 Thread Pratik Patel
Hello Everyone, I want to write unit tests for some solr queries which are being triggered through java code. These queries includes complex streaming expressions and faceting queries which requires large number of documents to be present in solr index. I can not create and push so many documents

Re: problem indexing GPS metadata for video upload

2019-05-10 Thread Tim Allison
Unfortunately, It Depends(TM)*...these are the steps I take: https://wiki.apache.org/tika/UpgradingTikaInSolr There can be version conflicts and other awful, unforeseen things if you don't get it right. We're on the cusp of the release for 1.21 (I mean it this time)...I'll upgrade Solr as soon as

Re: Solr query takes a too much time in Solr 6.1.0

2019-05-10 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/10/2019 7:32 AM, vishal patel wrote: We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple collections. Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many documents indexing and searching within milliseconds. There could be any number of causes of slow

Re: Slow faceting performance on a docValues field

2019-05-10 Thread gulats
maybe quite late to the party but for the benefit of future readers, experimentation with facet.range.method might be helpful (for solr versions 6 and above) as it allows us to use docValues as well for range faceting -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: Streaming Expression: get the value of the array at the specified position

2019-05-10 Thread David Hastings
no. On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:09 AM Nazerke S wrote: > Hi, > > I am interested in getting the value of the array at the given index. For > example, > > let(echo="b", a=array(1,2,3,4,5), b=getAt(a, 2)) should return 3. > > Is there a way to get access an array's element by indexing? > > Thanks!

Streaming Expression: get the value of the array at the specified position

2019-05-10 Thread Nazerke S
Hi, I am interested in getting the value of the array at the given index. For example, let(echo="b", a=array(1,2,3,4,5), b=getAt(a, 2)) should return 3. Is there a way to get access an array's element by indexing? Thanks! __Nazerke

Re: Solr query takes a too much time in Solr 6.1.0

2019-05-10 Thread David Hastings
first inclination is your index is cold. On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:32 AM vishal patel wrote: > We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple > collections. > Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many > documents indexing and searching within m

Solr query takes a too much time in Solr 6.1.0

2019-05-10 Thread vishal patel
We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in Live environment. we have multiple collections. Some times some query takes much time(QTime=52552). There are so many documents indexing and searching within milliseconds. When we executed the same query again using admin panel, it does not take a much time an

Re: Quick Favor?

2019-05-10 Thread Angie Rabelero
Can we block this user? > On May 10, 2019, at 05:12, xdreuc...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hey, > > I just signed the petition "President Duterte: PRRD, we believe it's time > to fire a few of your key comms people" and wanted to see if you could help > by adding your name. > > Our goal is to reach 10

Re: SOLR (6.3.0) Initialization Issue

2019-05-10 Thread Charlie Hull
On 10/05/2019 08:52, Charlie Hull wrote: On 09/05/2019 19:18, SAMMAR UL HASSAN wrote: Hi   Support Team,   I hope all is well. Let me explain what we are, what we are currently doing & what we want from you. We are IT based healthcare company, providing healthcare software services (EHR/EM

Quick Favor?

2019-05-10 Thread xdreucker
Hey, I just signed the petition "President Duterte: PRRD, we believe it's time to fire a few of your key comms people" and wanted to see if you could help by adding your name. Our goal is to reach 100 signatures and we need more support. You can read more and sign the petition here: http://chng.

Solr 8.0.0 error: cannot change field from index options=DOCS to inconsistent index options=DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS

2019-05-10 Thread Bjarke Buur Mortensen
Hi list, I'm trying to open a 7.x core in Solr 8. I'm getting the error: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher Digging further in the logs, I see the error: " ... Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: cannot change field "de

Re: SOLR (6.3.0) Initialization Issue

2019-05-10 Thread Charlie Hull
On 09/05/2019 19:18, SAMMAR UL HASSAN wrote: Hi   Support Team,   I hope all is well. Let me explain what we are, what we are currently doing & what we want from you. We are IT based healthcare company, providing healthcare software services (EHR/EMR) to doctors across the U.S. In many impo