Thanks for all these (main contributor's đ) valuable inputs!
First thing I did was getting getting rid of "expungeDeletes". My
"single-deletion" unittest failed unti I added the optimize-param
> updateReques.setParam( "optimize", "true" );
Does this make sense or should JIRA it?
How expensive is
On 1/26/2018 10:02 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> o.a.z.ClientCnxn Client session timed out, have not heard from server in
> 22130ms (although zkClientTimeOut is 3).
Are you absolutely certain that there is a setting for zkClientTimeout
that is actually getting applied? The default value in Solr
On 1/26/2018 9:55 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> Why do I want to do all this (dumb things)? The context is as follows:
> when a document is deleted in an index/core this deletion is not immediately
> reflected in the searchresults. Deletions at not really NRT (or has this
> changed?). Till now we
On 1/26/2018 12:24 PM, TK Solr wrote:
> If I want to deploy Solr on AWS, do people recommend using the
> prepackaged Bitnami Solr image? Or is it better to install Solr
> manually on a computer instance? Or are there a better way?
Solr has included an installer script for quite some time (since 5.
Also shameless self-promotion, but my company (Fogbeam Labs) is about
to launch a Solr / ManifoldCF powered Search-as-a-Service offering.
If you'd like to learn more, shoot me an email at prho...@fogbeam.com
and I'd be happy to give you the skinny.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I'll open a Jira issue.
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 at 01:21, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Yes, please open a JIRA issue.
> The elevate component modifies the sort parameter, and it looks like
> that doesn't play well with cursorMark, which needs to
> serialize/deserialize s
Although this is shameless promotion, but have you taken a look at
SearchStax (https://www.searchstax.com)? Why not use a Solr-as-a-Service?
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:24 AM, TK Solr wrote:
> If I want to deploy Solr on AWS, do people recommend using the prepackaged
> Bitnami Solr image? Or is i
I guess I'd say test with the image - especially if you're deploying a
larger number of Solr boxes. We do a lot of them where I work and
(unfortunately, for reasons I won't bother you with) can't use an image.
The time it takes to install solr is noticeable when we deploy Solr on our
100 plus EC2
Wait. What do you mean by: "... this deletion is not immediately
reflected in the search results..."? Like all other index operations
this change won't be "visible" until the next commit, but
expungeDeletes is (or should be) totally unnecessary. And very costly
for reasons other than you might be a
We have just upgraded our QA solr clouds to 7.2.0
We have 3 solr clouds. collections in the first cloud replicate to the
other 2
For existing collections which we upgraded in place using the lucene index
upgrade tool seem to behave correctly data written to collections in the
first environment rep
If I want to deploy Solr on AWS, do people recommend using the prepackaged
Bitnami Solr image? Or is it better to install Solr manually on a computer
instance? Or are there a better way?
TK
On 1/26/2018 4:23 AM, Vincenzo D'Amore wrote:
> The first client does the following:
>
> 1. rollbacks all add/deletes made to the index since the last commit (in
> case previous client execution was completed unsuccessfully).
> 2. reads data from sql server
> 3. updates solr documents
> 4. manually
Use a filter query to filter out all the documents marked deleted.
Donât use âexpunge deletesâ, it does more than you want because it forces a
merge. Just commit after sending the delete.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 26, 2018
Hi Zahid, if you want to allow searching only if the query is shorter than a
certain number of terms / characters, I would do it before calling solr
probably, otherwise you could write a QueryParserPlugin (see [1]) and check
that the query is sound before processing it.
See also:
http://coding
Hello,
We recently upgraded our clusters from 7.1 to 7.2.1. One collection (2 shard, 2
replica) specifically is in a bad state almost continuously, After proper
restart the cluster is all green. Within minutes the logs are flooded with many
bad omens:
o.a.z.ClientCnxn Client session timed out,
Thx Emir!
> You are thinking too RDMS
maybe the DBQ "missled" me đ
> The best you can do is select and send updates as a single bulk
how can I do "In-Place Updates"
(https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/updating-parts-of-documents.html#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-In-PlaceUpdates)
from/through
Hi Clemens,
You are thinking too RDMS. You can use query to select doc, but how would you
provide what are updated doc? I guess you could use this approach only for
incremental updates or with some scripting language. That is not supported at
the moment. The best you can do is select and send up
SolrClient has the method(s) deleteByQuery (which I make use of when I need to
reindex).
#updateByQuery does nicht exist. What if I want to "update all documents
matching a query"?
Thx
Clemens
Emir
Sow=false .. thanks for this!
The problem seems to be due to a stopword. Everything is fine when I avoid
stopwords in my query. The stopword might get removed in the query matching,
but I would need to allow some slop perhaps for pf2.
Thanks
Rick
On January 26, 2018 8:14:06 AM EST, "Emir
Hi All,
Is there any way I can restrict Solr search query to look for specified
number of characters/words (for only searching purposes not for
highlighting)
*For example:*
*Indexed content:*
*I am a man of my words I am a lazy man...*
Search to consider only below mentioned (words=7 or
Hi Rick,
It does not work in any case or it does not work for some cases - e.g.
something like lâavion? Maybe you can try use sow=false and see if it will help.
Cheers,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sem
Becky,
There are excellent log analysis systems. Logstash? Awstats? I do not think
Solr should do this. Some people index their logs into a separate Solr core for
analysis, but it might be a challenge to do this in a useful way.
Cheers -- Rick
On January 25, 2018 2:56:01 PM EST, Becky Bonner wr
Emir
Thanks, I will do when I get off this bus.
I have run the text thru the SolrAdmin Analyzer, it looks fine.
According to the debugQuery output, individual words match in the qf, but not
the pair that pf2 should match.
I compare the configs for English and French, and they are the same apart
Thanks Shawn,
>>
>> 30
>> false
>>
>>
>
> That autoCommit configuration is not affecting document visibility at all,
> because openSearcher is set to false. Don't rush to change this -- this
> kind of configuration is what you want. I would probably use one minute
> here rather than five
Hi Rick,
Can you include sample of your query and text that should match.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> On 25 Jan 2018, at 23:13, Rick Leir wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all
> My pf2 k
25 matches
Mail list logo
