Use a filter query to filter out all the documents marked deleted.

Don’t use “expunge deletes”, it does more than you want because it forces a 
merge. Just commit after sending the delete.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)


> On Jan 26, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV <clemens...@mysign.ch> wrote:
> 
> Thx Emir!
> 
>> You are thinking too RDMS
> maybe the DBQ "missled" me 😉
> 
>> The best you can do is select and send updates as a single bulk
> how can I do "In-Place Updates" 
> (https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/updating-parts-of-documents.html#UpdatingPartsofDocuments-In-PlaceUpdates)
>  from/through SolrJ?
> 
>> Also use DBQ with caution - it does not work well with concurrent updates
> we "prevent" this through sequentialization (per core )
> 
> Why do I want to do all this (dumb things)? The context is as follows:
> when a document is deleted in an index/core this deletion is not immediately 
> reflected in the searchresults. Deletions at not really NRT (or has this 
> changed?). Till now we "solved" this brutely by forcing a commit (with 
> "expunge deletes"), till we noticed that this results in quite a "heavy 
> load", to say the least.
> Now I have the idea to add a "deleted"-flag to all the documents that is 
> filtered on on all queries.
> When it comes to deletions, I would upate the document's deleted flag and 
> then effectively delete it. For single deletion this is ok, but what if I 
> need to re-index?
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Emir Arnautović [mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com] 
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Januar 2018 17:31
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: SolrClient#updateByQuery?
> 
> Hi Clemens,
> You are thinking too RDMS. You can use query to select doc, but how would you 
> provide what are updated doc? I guess you could use this approach only for 
> incremental updates or with some scripting language. That is not supported at 
> the moment. The best you can do is select and send updates as a single bulk.
> 
> Also use DBQ with caution - it does not work well with concurrent updates.
> 
> HTH,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & 
> Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
> 
> 
> 
>> On 26 Jan 2018, at 17:10, Clemens Wyss DEV <clemens...@mysign.ch> wrote:
>> 
>> SolrClient has the method(s) deleteByQuery (which I make use of when I need 
>> to reindex). 
>> #updateByQuery does nicht exist. What if I want to "update all documents 
>> matching a query"?
>> 
>> 
>> Thx
>> Clemens
> 

Reply via email to