RE: Arabic words search in solr

Use mm=100% in the request handler It will give the same AND functionality On 06-Aug-2017 11:59 AM, "mohanmca01" wrote: hello Allison. thank you for the information. i referred to your slide "33", yes we are looking for same kind of results and solution. would you please guide us on how to a

RE: Arabic words search in solr

hello Allison. thank you for the information. i referred to your slide "33", yes we are looking for same kind of results and solution. would you please guide us on how to achieve this? also, we would like to know Instead of putting AND operator in between the words if there is another way of do

Re: Arabic words search in solr

Hi Dave, Yes we are getting the results while using AND operator in between the words. Below is the example: *Scenario 1:* { "responseHeader": { "status": 0, "QTime": 1, "params": { "indent": "true", "q": "bizNameAr:(مسقط AND الاتصال)", "_": "1501998206658",

Re: solr hangs

How are you updating 50K docs? SolrJ? If so are you using CloudSolrClient? What are your commit settings? Details matter. Best, Erick On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 6:19 PM, hawk wrote: > Hi All, > > I have encountered one problem of Solr. In our environment, we setup 2 Solr > nodes, every hour we will

solr hangs

Hi All, I have encountered one problem of Solr. In our environment, we setup 2 Solr nodes, every hour we will update request to Solr to update the documents, the total documents are around 50k. From time to time, the Solr hangs and the client encounters the timeout issue. below is the excepti

Re: AW: plus sign in request / looking for + in title

Take a look at the other filters, there are a ton of them. PatternReplaceFilterFactory is a possibility. Best, Erick On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:01 AM, d.ku...@technisat.de wrote: > Hey, > > that is a good point. What is the best way for filtering? About the plus at > the request, we are doing on

Re: Move index directory to another partition

bq: I was envisioning a scenario where the entire solr home is on the old volume that's going away. If I were setting up a Solr install where the large/fast storage was a separate filesystem, I would put the solr home (or possibly even the entire install) under that mount point. It would be a lot

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

People who want to use Solr as a database should understand that it does not satisfy the ACID properties. It doesn’t have atomicity, because if some documents in a batch fail, the rest will still be committed. It doesn’t have isolation, one commit will submit all pending updates. Not sure about

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

*And insults are not something I'd like to see in this mailing list, at all* +1 Everyone is entitled to their opinion.. Solr can and does work extremely well as a database - it depends on your db requirements. For distributed/replicated search via REST API that is read heavy, Solr is a great choic

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

I read the seven year old slides just now. The Guardian was using Solr to deliver the content. Their repository (see slide 38) is an RDBMS. https://www.slideshare.net/matwall/no-sql-at-the-guardian In slide 37, part of “Is Solr a database?”, they note “Search index not really persistence”. To m

Re: streaming expression search on top of merged collections

What do you mean by merged collection? If you mean across an entire collection then the answer yes. Streaming Expressions always run across an entire collection. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Minh Truong wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question relat

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

And to add to the conversation, 7 year old blog posts are not a reason to make decisions for your tech stack. And insults are not something I'd like to see in this mailing list, at all, so please do not repeat any such disrespect or condescending statements in your contributions to the mailing

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Also I wouldn't really recommend mongodb at all, it should only to be used as a fast front end to an acid compliant relational db same with memcahed for example. If you're going to stick to open source, as I do, you should use the correct tool for the job. > On Aug 5, 2017, at 7:32 AM, GW wr

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Solr=search engine Mongodb=schemaless database > On Aug 5, 2017, at 12:26 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > > MarkLogic can do many-to-many. I worked there six years ago. They use search > engine index structure with generational updates, including segment level > caches. With locking. Pretty go

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Insults for Walter only.. sorry.. On 5 August 2017 at 06:28, GW wrote: > For The Guardian, Solr is the new database | Lucidworks >

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

For The Guardian, Solr is the new database | Lucidworks

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

I doubt your statement, you can learn more about why you should prefer Solr here: https://aphyr.com/posts/322-call-me-maybe-mongodb-stale-reads On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 at 01:16, Francesco Viscomi wrote: > Hi all, > why i have to choose solr if mongoDb is easier to learn and to use? > Both are NoSql

Re: MongoDb vs Solr

Watch their videos On 4 August 2017 at 23:26, Walter Underwood wrote: > MarkLogic can do many-to-many. I worked there six years ago. They use > search engine index structure with generational updates, including segment > level caches. With locking. Pretty good stuff. > > A many to many relat