Yes it can be local directory
File:///full path
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 at 10:25 PM, d0ct0r4r6a wrote:
> For the URL param in the "extract" entity, can it be a local directory? If
> yes, how do you specify the path?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr
For the URL param in the "extract" entity, can it be a local directory? If
yes, how do you specify the path?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-DIH-using-JDBC-with-TIKA-tp4180737p4344273.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We too often end up with a shard looking like:
{
"name": "shard2",
"range": "0-7fff",
"state": "active",
"replicas": [
{
"name": "core_node1",
"core": "sial-catalog-gene_shard2_replica2",
"baseUrl": "http://uc1f-ecom-msc01:8983/solr";,
"nodeName": "uc1f-ecom-msc01:8983_solr",
"state": "active"
I've seen this a number of times. We do cdcr replication to a cloud, and
only the shard leader gets data.
CDCR source has 2 nodes and we replicate to 2 clouds each of which have 4
nodes
Both source and targets have 2 shards
We frequently end up with collections where the target shard leader has
d
In the very early releases (5x) the /export handler had a different format
then the /search handler. Later the /export handler was changed to have the
same basic response format as the /search handler. This was done in
anticipation of unifying /search and /export at a later date.
The /export handl
Hello Joel,
I tried to create a patch to add UniqueMetric and it works, but soon
realized, we have UniqueStream as well and can't load both of them (like
below) when required, since both uses "unique" keyword.
Any advice how we can handle this. Come up with different keyword for
UniqueMetric or
restarting the zookeeper on the source cloud seems to have helped
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Webster Homer
wrote:
> Another strange error message I'm seeing
> 2017-07-04 18:59:40.585 WARN (cdcr-replicator-110-thread-
> 4-processing-n:dfw-pauth-msc02:8983_solr) [ ] o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator
Another strange error message I'm seeing
2017-07-04 18:59:40.585 WARN
(cdcr-replicator-110-thread-4-processing-n:dfw-pauth-msc02:8983_solr) [
] o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicator Failed to forward update request to target:
sial-catalog-product
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Could not load collection fr
We've been using cdcr for a while now. It seems to be pretty fragile.
Currently we're seeing tons of errors like this:
2017-07-04 14:41:27.015 ERROR
(cdcr-bootstrap-status-51-thread-1-processing-n:dfw-pauth-msc02:8983_solr)
[ ] o.a.s.h.CdcrReplicatorManager Exception during bootstrap status reques
The only way I know to directly add multiple facet fields in the Admin UI is
to add those facet fields in the "Raw Query Parameters". Like this:
facet.field=subject&facet.field=type&facet.field=organization&facet.field=region
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
First of all, Solr doesn't implement strict boolean logic, see Hoss'
explanation here:
https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
And bare "not" operators are a pain. There's actually _some_ trickery
_some_ places
to help you out (fq clauses come to mind) and prepend *:* for you.
I
9 months ago I did a proof of concept for solr streaming using the /export
handler. At that time, I got tuples back.
Now when I try 6.x, I get results in a format similar to /search (including a
count), instead of tuples (with an EOF).
Did something change between 5.x and 6.x in this regard?
I
You can set default values in the UpdateRequestProcessor chain:
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr/update/processor/DefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory.html
You can combine URPs with DIH. There is an example for that in the latest Solr:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-so
Hello everyone o/. Im trying to index a xml file using DIH.
Its mostly like this.
EXAMPLE DIH CONFIG STRUCTURE
EXAMPLE XML STRUCTURE
xx
xx
xx
On 11/04/2017 20:48, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
It depends. We've been trying to make parsers more, erm, flexible, but there
are some problems from which we cannot recover.
Tl;dr there isn't a short answer. :(
My sense is that DIH/ExtractingDocumentHandler is intended to get people up and
r
Hey folks,
I'm experiencing some strange query behaviour, and it isn't immediately
clear to me why this wouldn happen. The definition of the query syntax
on the wiki is a bit fuzzy, so my interpretation of the syntax might be off.
This query does work (no results, when results are expected).
(-s
Thanks a lot,
for now I've written a listener to read from redis instead.
But might not scale well since the map is kept in memory.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-any-particular-reason-why-ExternalFileField-is-read-from-data-directory-tp4343374p4344
Hi Walid
Is there any error occurring? If not, then do not change anything. Yes, that
version of Solr is old, if you get the chance you would want to upgrade. Cheers
-- Rick
On July 4, 2017 6:11:57 AM EDT, walid wrote:
>Hi,
>i have a multiple solr slaves reversed by nginx, clients browser send
Did you try to reproduce this on latest Solr (6.6) just to rule out any bug
with that version (though less likely). Pls download and do a quick test.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Solr User wrote:
> Not sure if it helps beyond the steps to reproduce that I supplied above,
> but I also see tha
Hi,
i have a multiple solr slaves reversed by nginx, clients browser send to
nginx who reverse with round robin to solr slaves, clients use post, and
directly deal with solrs i use "ajax-solr". with this configuration and if i
have a lot of ecommerce users, Is there a risk to have many tomcat sessi
20 matches
Mail list logo
