Hi,
I did not manipulating the data dir. What I did was:
1. Downloaded solr-6.5.1.zip
2. ensured no solr process is running
3. unzipped solr-6.5.1.zip to ~/solr_new2/solr-6.5.1
3. started an external zookeeper
4. copied a conf directory from a working non-cloudsolr (6.5.1) to
~/solr_new2/sol
Yes, the id is the unique key.
I think maybe this is because the first one (a parent doc(Parent1) without
any children) is not a block (I don't really know what's the term), so later
when we add same parent (Parent2) with some children, the first one is
somehow left alone.
- If we update the pare
Is the id your unique key in the collections? By right if your id is the
unique key, it will be overwritten automatically if the id is the same,
when you add the same parent documents with child documents.
Regards,
Edwin
On 16 May 2017 at 08:25, Jeffery Yuan wrote:
> Hi, Damien Kamerman
>
>
Well didn't take as long as I thought:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1306
Once Calcite 1.13 is released we should upgrade and get support for this
again.
Kevin Risden
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Kevin Risden
wrote:
> Yea this came up on the calcite mailing list. Not sure i
Yea this came up on the calcite mailing list. Not sure if aliases in the
having clause were going to be added. I'll have to see if I can find that
discussion or JIRA.
Kevin Risden
On May 16, 2017 18:54, "Joel Bernstein" wrote:
> Yeah, Calcite doesn't support field aliases in the having clause.
Yep, saw it. I'll comment on the ticket for what I believe needs to be done.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Varun Thacker wrote:
> Hi Joel,Susmit
>
> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10698 to track the
> issue
>
> @Susmit lookin
Hi Joel,Susmit
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10698 to track the
issue
@Susmit looking at the stack trace I see the expression is using
JSONTupleStream
. I wonder if you tried using JavabinTupleStreamParser could it help
improve performance ?
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:39 AM
Yeah, Calcite doesn't support field aliases in the having clause. The query
should work if you use count(*). We could consider this a regression, but I
think this will be a won't fix.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Timothy Potter
wrote:
> This SQL
I think it's depends what you are backing up and restoring from. Hardware
failure? Accidental delete? For my use case my master indexer stores the index
on a San with daily snap shots for reliability, then my live searching master
is on a San as well, my live slave searchers are all on SSD driv
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any best practices for doing solr backup &
restore. In the past when running backup, I stopped indexing during the
backup process.
I am looking at this documentation and it says that indexing can continue
when backup is in progress.
https://cwiki.apache.org/conflue
If you pass the array of documents without the opening and closing square
brackets it should work with the page defaults (at least in v6.3.0)
{ "id":"1",...},{"id":"2",...},...
instead of
[{ "id":"1",...},{"id":"2",...},...]
Best,
Chris
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:42 PM Rick Leir wrote:
> Hi all
Do not see any similar issue fixed part of later releases.
Anyone experienced similar issue / suggestions to look into?
Thanks,
Susheel
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> Look at all the bugs fixed or reported after 6.0.0. This might have been
> reported and their might
Look at all the bugs fixed or reported after 6.0.0. This might have been
reported and their might be a workaround.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 16, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Walter - will upgrade to 6.5.
Hi all,
In the Solr Admin Documents tab, with the document type set to JSON, I cannot
get it to accept more than one document. The legend says "Document(s)". What
syntax is expected? It rejects an array of documents. Thanks -- Rick
--
Sorry for being brief. Alternate email is rickleir at yahoo d
Hi Walter - will upgrade to 6.5.1 but this will take time to go from all
the environments to Prod.
Looking for something short term while we upgrade.
Though we can connect to Solr Admin panel on the shard which is down but if
I query shards.info, then that shard is not being shown/queried. So i
Is this the equivalent of facet.query’s? or maybe rather, group.query?
Erik
> On May 16, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
>
> Something like elasticsearch named-queries, right
> https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-request-named-queries-and-fil
I would upgrade to 6.5.1 before doing anything else. 6.0.0 is more than a year
old.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 16, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Susheel Kumar wrote:
>
> Also this is for Solr-6.0.0.
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:41
dorian - yup!
mikhail - interesting, will definitely check it out.
thanks-
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
www.curvolabs.com
58 Adams Ave
Evansville, IN 47713
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Dorian Hoxha
wrote:
> Something like elasticsea
John,
You can probably go with something like
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7628. I even gave a talk about
this approach. But turns out it's really hard to support.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:10 PM, John Blythe wrote:
> sorry for the confusion. as in i received results due to match
Also interested in custom/pluggable routing.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Hmmm, would the functionality be served by just using implicit routing
> putting the logic in creating the doc and populating the route field?
> Not, perhaps, as elegant as having some kind of p
Also this is for Solr-6.0.0.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the shard (out of 6 six shards and 6 replica's) we have, is being
> shown as down in Solr Admin Cloud Panel (orange color) while the Solr
> process is running and even can connect to it Solr A
Something like elasticsearch named-queries, right
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-request-named-queries-and-filters.html
?
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:10 PM, John Blythe wrote:
> sorry for the confusion. as in i received results due to matches on field x
> v
sorry for the confusion. as in i received results due to matches on field x
vs. field y.
i've gone w a highlighting solution for now. the fact that it requires
field storage isn't yet prohibitive for me, so can serve well for now. open
to any alternative approaches all the same
thanks-
--
*John
Hi,
When we do a Carrot Clustering query on a set of solr documents we get back
following type of response.
DDR
3.9599865057283354
TWINX2048-3200PRO
VS1GB400C3
VDBDB1A16
iPod
11.959228467
This SQL used to work pre-calcite:
SELECT movie_id, COUNT(*) as num_ratings, avg(rating) as aggAvg FROM
ratings GROUP BY movie_id HAVING num_ratings > 100 ORDER BY aggAvg ASC
LIMIT 10
Now I get:
Caused by: java.io.IOException: -->
http://192.168.1.4:8983/solr/ratings_shard2_replica1/:Failed to
ex
Hi Shawn,
I forgot that legacy-int-fields were deprecated. Point fields it is then.
Thanks,
Dorian
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/16/2017 3:33 AM, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
> > Has anyone measured which is more efficient/performant between the 2
> > intfields if we don't
Hello,
One of the shard (out of 6 six shards and 6 replica's) we have, is being
shown as down in Solr Admin Cloud Panel (orange color) while the Solr
process is running and even can connect to it Solr Admin Cloud panel. Each
shard size is around 18GB and have around 40+ million docs.
Also I do n
Hi Joel,
queries can be arbitrarily nested with AND/OR/NOT joins e.g.
(intersect(intersect(search, search), union(search, search))). If I cut off
the innermost stream with a limit, the complete intersection would not
happen at upper levels. Also would the limit stream have same effect as
using /s
Your problem statement is not quite clear, however I will make a guess.
Assuming your problem is that when you remove the '>' sign from your query term
you receive zero results, then this is actually expected behavior for field
types that are of type string. When searching against string fields
Streaming Expressions has this capability through it's parallel executor
and priority streams. But this would mean switching to a queue based
mechanism for both indexing a querying. Here is a blog describing how this
works:
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/01/deploying-solrs-new-parallel-executor
Rick:
Easiest to _code_. There isn't any. And if you just toss the problem
over the fence to support then it's not a problem ;)
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Björn
> You are not serious about (1) are you? Yikes!! Easiest for you if you do not
> need to sit at
Hello Solr Geeks,
Am looking for some helping hands to proceed on an issue am facing now.
Here given below one record from the prepared index. i could query the
fields without greater than symbol. but when i did query for
widthSquareTube_string_mv & heightSquareTube_string_mv. It is not returning
Björn
You are not serious about (1) are you? Yikes!! Easiest for you if you do not
need to sit at the helpdesk. Easiest if the users stop using the system.
My guess is that (2) is easiest if you have text entry boxes for each field,
and the user need not type in the field name. Cheers -- Rick
Yes your assumptions are correct. I have built the suggester and it works
fine without the cfq.
These queries work:
/autocomplete?suggest.q=mexican&wt=json
/select?indent=on&q=+isoDateTime:[2016-05-16T0:0:0.0Z%20TO%20*]&wt=json
This one does not:
/autocomplete?suggest.q=mexican&suggest.
what do you mean "hit?" As in the user clicked it?
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:35 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> hey all. i'm sending data out that could represent a purchased item or a
> competitive alternative. when the results are returned i'm needing to know
> which of the two were hit so i can ser
hey all. i'm sending data out that could represent a purchased item or a
competitive alternative. when the results are returned i'm needing to know
which of the two were hit so i can serve up the *other*.
i can make a blunt instrument in the application layer to simply look for a
match between the
Hi,
Could anyone please help reviewing the below json facet api query.
After updating to json facet api we are getting strange results in which the
count
(uniqueCount) for the first facet bucket is correct and the remaining are
either 0 or incorrect.
Below are the both the solr query urls:
Hello
I have a question about resource governance / quality of service.
Is there any way to configure priorities of queries? Can I set some select
queries, for example, higher priority than index (add/update) ?
Thanks
Avi
This email and any attachments there
Yeah, your options (5) and (6) are well... definitely at the
bottom of _my_ list, I understand you included them for
completeness...
as for (4) Oh, my aching head. Parsers give me a headache ;)
Yes, (1) is the easiest.(2) and (3) mostly depend on where you're most
comfortable coding. If you i
Hmmm, would the functionality be served by just using implicit routing
putting the logic in creating the doc and populating the route field?
Not, perhaps, as elegant as having some kind of pluggable routing I
grant.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> There was a q
What David said. There are a very few cases where changing your schema
does _not_ require that you blow away your index and re-index from
scratch. I always blow the index away when I make any changes if at
all possible.
Also note that when you quote, you are asking for _phrases_, so
searching for
On 5/15/2017 7:26 AM, Mithu Tokder wrote:
> Now my question is that as the solr instances are running in three
> machines so is it required to configure same value for STOP.PORT and
> STOP.KEY in start and stop script of three machines or i can use
> separate value for them.
The port and key can o
On 5/12/2017 8:49 AM, Thomas Porschberg wrote:
> ERROR: Failed to create collection 'cat' due to:
> {127.0.1.1:8983_solr=org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException:Error
> from server at http://127.0.1.1:8983/solr: Error CREATEing SolrCore
> 'cat_shard1_replica1': Unabl
There was a question in the #solr IRC channel about creating a custom
document router to assign documents to shards based on geolocation data.
Looking into this, I think I see a roadblock or two standing in the way
of users creating custom router implementations.
The "routerMap" field in the DocR
something in text_general isnt actually doing what its supposed to be
doing, is it possible you indexed it as a string then changed the type for
the field after the fact?
on my title i have something like such:
"rawquerystring": "title:University",
"querystring": "title:University",
"parsed
On 5/11/2017 12:26 PM, Deepak Mali wrote:
> if there is any way to set threshold memory to the solr indexing process.
> My computer is hung and the indexing process is killed by the OS.
>
> So , I was wondering if there is any way to set threshold memory usage to
> solr indexing process in linux en
On 5/10/2017 6:34 AM, Prashobh Chandran wrote:
>Currently we are using solr 5.3.1 engine, Im getting json format results
> from engine. But it's taking time to getting results, So i need to speed up
> solr response writer. Is there anyway?
It seems very unlikely that the response writer is the
Now that I know what to look for in the debugQuery it's becoming more clear.
Yes, it's just searching "text" unless I specify otherwise. More importantly,
title searches don't work at all unless I search on the complete title; words
used in the title have no effect. Clearly I'm doing something w
On 5/16/2017 3:07 AM, Noriyuki TAKEI wrote:
> I use Solr Cloud with 3 Zoo Keepers and 2 Solr Servers,
> having 3 shards and 2 replicas.
>
> These servers are running as virtual machine on VMWare and
> virtual machines are stored in the iSCSI storage attached to VMWare.
>
> One day,iSCSI storage fai
On 5/16/2017 3:33 AM, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
> Has anyone measured which is more efficient/performant between the 2
> intfields if we don't need to do range-checking ? (precisionStep=0)
Point field support in Solr is *BRAND NEW*. Very little information is
available yet on the Solr implementation.
Your approach looks OK. The single sharded worker collection is only needed
if you were using CloudSolrStream to send the initial Streaming Expression
to the /stream handler. You are not doing this, so you're approach is fine.
Here are some thoughts on what you described:
1) If you are closing th
On 5/15/2017 11:31 PM, Noriyuki TAKEI wrote:
> I update some fields by Solj Atomic Update.But in
> particular case, an error occurred.
>
> When I try to set the value "2017-01-01" to date filed
> by Solrj Atomic Update,the following error message appears.
If the field is using the TrieDateField
Shalin,
Thanks for the response and explanation! I logged a JIRA per your request
here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10695
Chris
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Chris Troullis
> wrote:
> >
Hi,
Has anyone measured which is more efficient/performant between the 2
intfields if we don't need to do range-checking ? (precisionStep=0)
Regards,
Dorian
Hi.All.
I use Solr Cloud with 3 Zoo Keepers and 2 Solr Servers,
having 3 shards and 2 replicas.
These servers are running as virtual machine on VMWare and
virtual machines are stored in the iSCSI storage attached to VMWare.
One day,iSCSI storage failure suddenly occurred and then 1 Solr Server a
Hi all,
thank you for your replies!
We do not directly expose the Solr API, but provide an endpoint in our backend
which acts as a proxy for a specific search handler. One requirement in our
application is to search for people using various properties, e.g., first name,
last name, description,
56 matches
Mail list logo
