John, You can probably go with something like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7628. I even gave a talk about this approach. But turns out it's really hard to support.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:10 PM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote: > sorry for the confusion. as in i received results due to matches on field x > vs. field y. > > i've gone w a highlighting solution for now. the fact that it requires > field storage isn't yet prohibitive for me, so can serve well for now. open > to any alternative approaches all the same > > thanks- > > -- > *John Blythe* > Product Manager & Lead Developer > > 251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com > www.curvolabs.com > > 58 Adams Ave > Evansville, IN 47713 > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:37 AM, David Hastings < > hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > what do you mean "hit?" As in the user clicked it? > > > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:35 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> > wrote: > > > > > hey all. i'm sending data out that could represent a purchased item or > a > > > competitive alternative. when the results are returned i'm needing to > > know > > > which of the two were hit so i can serve up the *other*. > > > > > > i can make a blunt instrument in the application layer to simply look > > for a > > > match between the queried terms and the resulting fields, but the > problem > > > of fuzzy matching and some of the special analysis being done to get > the > > > hits will be for naught. > > > > > > cursory googling landed me at a similar discussion that suggested using > > hit > > > highlighting or retrieving the debuggers explain data to sort through. > > > > > > is there another, more efficient means or are these the two tools in > the > > > toolbox? > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
