in case this helps someone, here is a solution (probably very
efficient already, but i didn't profile it); it can deal with DocValues and
with FieldCache (the old 'stored' values)
private void unInvertedTheDamnThing(
SolrIndexSearcher searcher,
List fields,
KVSetter setter) thr
Thanks for your reply. I was not seeing the param being added in return
results. but after adding echoParams=true, I see that facet method is being
added.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-invariants-to-set-facet-method-tp4292142p4292149.html
Sent f
>From my testing program, there's nothing standard here.
As the blog points out, since I was indexing fairly
simple documents you should _not_ be expecting to
see those indexing rates. The point of the article was
just to show the _relative_ changes when I sent
batches.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 1
Setting the facet method to enum will have
consequences for the filterCache, especially
if you allow faceting on high-cardinality fields
so for that specific example I'd be cautious.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> That's what it is there for. Are you
That's what it is there for. Are you seeing any issues?
You can confirm whether it works or not by adding echoParams=all to
the query (or in the defaults/invariants).
Regards,
Alex
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 18 August 201
Is it possible to use the invariants in Solr config to set facet.method to
override what user is sending?
enum
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-invariants-to-set-facet-method-tp4292142.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arc
Erick
Going through the article which you shared. Where are you getting the
Docs/second value?
Thanks
On 8/17/16, 4:37 PM, "Jaspal Sawhney" wrote:
>Erick
>Thanks - My batch size was 30 and thread size also 30.
>Thanks
>
>On 8/17/16, 3:48 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
>
>>What this probably indica
Erick
Thanks - My batch size was 30 and thread size also 30.
Thanks
On 8/17/16, 3:48 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
>What this probably indicates is that the size of the packets you send
>to Solr is large enough that it exceeds the transport protocol's
>limit. This is reinforced by your statement t
Hello,
I have written a data service to send an HttpPost command to post JSON to
Solr. The code is working, but now I want to switch to using an embedded
Solr server for just the unit tests. The problem is that the embedded Solr
server doesn't seem to be starting an embedded server with a port.
What this probably indicates is that the size of the packets you send
to Solr is large enough that it exceeds the transport protocol's
limit. This is reinforced by your statement that reducing the batch
size fixes the problem even though it increases indexing time.
So the place I'd be looking is t
Bump !
On 8/16/16, 10:53 PM, "Jaspal Sawhney" wrote:
>Hello
>We are running solr 4.6 in master-slave configuration where in our master
>is used entirely for indexing. No search traffic comes to master ever.
>Off late we have started to get the early EOF error on the solr Master
>which results in
Joel, thanks, but which of them? I've counted at least 4, if not more,
different ways of how to get DocValues. Are there many functionally
equal approaches just because devs can't agree on using one api? Or is
there a deeper reason?
Btw, the FieldCache is still there - both in lucene (to be deprec
Erick already gave you the solution, additional to that there’s a wiki
page that might contain a few more things about relevancy:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_change_the_score_of_a_document_based_on_the_.2Avalue.2A_of_a_field_.28say.2C_.22popularity.22.29
-Stefan
On A
Hi Toke,
Thanks for the explanation.
I will prefer the memory-based limit too. At first I got confused with that
too, thinking that the setting of 2000 means 2GB.
Regards,
Edwin
On 17 August 2016 at 17:40, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 11:02 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
>
Try:
recip(rord(creationDate),1,1000,1000)
See:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
You can play with the magic numbers to influence how this scales your docs.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Jay Parashar wrote:
> This is correct: " I index it and feed it the timestamp at i
thanks that works perfectly!
Scott
Original Message
Subject: Re: Modified stat of index
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
To: solr-user
Date: 08/16/2016 04:17 PM
I believe you can get that via Luke REST API:
http://localhost:8983/solr//admin/luke
Regards,
Alex.
Newslette
Hi Nabil,
You can use frange queries, e.g. you can use fq={!frange
l=100}sum(field1,field2) to filter doc with sum greater than 100.
Regards,
Emir
On 17.08.2016 16:26, nabil Kouici wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to use functions (function query
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/F
Hi
It is quite normal that index size can be close to double during background
merge of segments. If you have a lot of deletions and/or reindexed docs then
the same document may also exist in multiple segments, taking up space
temporarily until a merge or optimize.
If this slows down your syst
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for the info ... what is the advantage of using the JSON FACET
API compared to the standard BlockJoinQuery features?
Is there already anybody working on the tagging/exclusion feature or is
there any timeframe for it? There wasn't any discussion yet in SOLR-8998
about exclu
any update??
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:47 PM, kshitij tyagi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to understand what is refcount in stats section of solr admin.
>
> I am seeing refcount: 2 on my solr cores and on one of the core i am
> seeing refcount:171.
>
> The core with refcount with higher number is
Hi,
Is it possible to use functions (function query
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries) in q or fq
parameters to build a complex search expression.
For exemple, take only documents that sum(field1,field2)> 100. Another exemple:
if(test,value1,value2):vallue3
Regar
This is correct: " I index it and feed it the timestamp at index time".
You can sort desc on that field (can be a TrieDateField)
-Original Message-
From: Steven White [mailto:swhite4...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:01 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Ext] Inf
Hi everyone
Let's say I search for the word "Olympic" and I get a hit on 10 documents
that have similar content (let us assume the content is at least 80%
identical) how can I have Solr rank them so that the ones with most
recently updated doc gets ranked higher? Is this something I have to do at
Hi,
Suddenly my index size just doubles and indexing just slows down poorly.
After sometime it reduces back to normal and indexing starts working.
Can someone help me out in finding why index size doubles abnormally??
Stefan,
child.facet.field never intend to support exclusions. My preference is to
implement it under json.facet that's discussed under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8998.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Stefan Moises wrote:
> Hey girls and guys,
>
> for a long time we have been usi
Hey girls and guys,
for a long time we have been using our own BlockJoin Implementation, because
for our Shop Systems a lot of requirements that we had were not implemented in
solr.
As we now had a deeper look into how far the standard has come, we saw that
BlockJoin and faceting on children
Thank you Alex and Anshum! I will look into both of these.
Jennifer
From: Anshum Gupta
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: 08/16/2016 08:17 PM
Subject:Re: Creating a SolrJ Data Service to send JSON to Solr
I would also suggest sending the JSON directly to the JSON end poin
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 11:02 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Would like to check, do I need to increase my Java Heap size for
> Solr, if I plan to increase my filterCache size in solrconfig.xml?
>
> I'm using Solr 6.1.0
It _seems_ that you can specify a limit in megabytes when using
LRUCache i
Hi,
I need to understand what is refcount in stats section of solr admin.
I am seeing refcount: 2 on my solr cores and on one of the core i am seeing
refcount:171.
The core with refcount with higher number is having very slow indexing
speed?
This is what helped me:
https://gist.github.com/jankronquist/6412839
-Original Message-
From: Kostas [mailto:k...@dataverse.gr]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 3:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: solr-6.1.0 - Using different client and server certificates for
authentication d
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your reply.
But do we have to set the Java Heap size based on all the collections
available (if I were to increase the filterCache size for all my
collections)?
I come across this from StackOverFlow,
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2004/solr-filter-cache-fastlrucache-
31 matches
Mail list logo
