I found that it works if I put the code in this way without the URLEncoder
req.setParam("literal.title", filename);
Is the URLEncoder doing the encoding from the chinese characters to the string
of code like this "%E7%AB%8B%E9".?
Regards,
Edwin
On 19 October 2015 at 11:29, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Hi All,
I've had a first look at porting the patch I did for SOLR-7191 (SolrCloud
with thousands of collections) in Solr 4.10 to the Solr trunk (1708905).
Now I created 6,000 collections (3 nodes; 2 x replicas) and re-started the
3 nodes. What I noticed is that the cloud is starting but slowly. Al
Lucene/Solr Revolution just keeps getting better every year, and this year
was clearly the best year yet!
I saw two major themes that I'd say about about 2/3 of the talk were
focused on:
1) Search Relevancy
2) Analytics
I'd definitely say that that there's a greatly emerging landscape of
pres
Hi,
I'm using the URLEncoder withg "UTF-8" encoding in SolrJ (code is written
in Eclipse) to index the file name to Solr. The code looks like this.
req.setParam("literal.title", URLEncoder.encode(filename, "UTF-8"));
However, what is index in Solr is a string of code like this
"%E7%AB%8B%E9". Wh
Here's a bit from my colleague Eric Pugh summarizing Grants keynote.
Admittedly he's also focussing a lot on our firms relevance
capabilities/products (the keynote was on relevance) so extensive shameless
plug warning included with this link :)
http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2015/10/15/bad-
Here is my first stab at it. Thoughts?
Question:
new PayloadTermQuery(new Term(nv[0].substring(1), nv[1]), new
AveragePayloadFunction(), false)
How do I handle the "false" ? It means boolean includeSpanScore
@Override
public Query parse() throws SyntaxError {
if (qstr == null || qstr.len
Summary of new things in 5.x or 6.x that is catching fire? Ideas? Thoughts
on the Facet caching flame war?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> I couldn't also make it. Would love to hear more who make it.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jack Krup
Wondering how to change my payload based on example:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/06/13/end-to-end-payload-example-in-solr/
PayloadTermQuery and BooleanQuery are deprecated in 5.3.x
@Override
public Query parse() throws SyntaxError {
if (qstr == null || qstr.length() == 0) return null;
I couldn't also make it. Would love to hear more who make it.
Thanks,
Susheel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Sorry I missed out this year. I thought it was next month and hadn't seen
> any reminders. Just last Tuesday I finally got around to googling the
> conference
hi all.
i am new in solr.i use more like this (query handler) for get docs that are
similar to specefic doc that i mentioned.
and my issue is when i get some docs , i wanna to changed sort of that, for
example imagine that docs have one field as like_count,
i wanna to get more related docs to doc i
Robert,
>From what I know as inverted index as docvalues compress content much, even
stored fields compressed too. So, I think you have much chance to
experiment successfully. You might need tweak schema disabling storing
unnecessary info in the index.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Robert Krüge
It would be very useful to add a button to replicate (like we have
optimize) on
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo
Also a link to the core would be great too
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
Sorry I missed out this year. I thought it was next month and hadn't seen
any reminders. Just last Tuesday I finally got around to googling the
conference and was shocked to read that it was the next day. Oh well.
Personally I'm less interested in the formal sessions than the informal
networking.
I'd still like to see a very clear statement of how data is stored in
Lucene. For example, is there any increase in index size if you placed your
32-bit integers in a long field? Could somebody make a clear statement
about what the index packing/compression would actually do - not the actual
algori
On the surface this seems like something of a distraction.
10M docs x 100 values/docs = 1B integers. Assuming all
need to be held in memory at once. My straw-man proposal:
it would be much cheaper to just provision each JVM
with an additional couple of gig memory and forget about it.
Feel free to
The Revolution was not televised (though heavily tweeted, and videos of
sessions to follow eventually). A great time was had by all. Much learning!
Much collaboration. Awesome event if I may say so myself. I'm proud to be a
part of the organization that put on the best conference I've been t
It went very well. Lots of interesting talks.
I believe you (Mr. Bell) were even mentioned by Ted Sullivan for
voting for his Jira proposal on the AutophrasingFilter. The talk was
extremely interesting and I intend to follow up on it. :-)
The slides are starting to come up already. Mine are at:
h
17 matches
Mail list logo
