Hi Bill, My index size is around 48GB and contains around 8 million
documents.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-went-on-recovery-multiple-time-tp4196249p4196504.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/31/2015 12:25 AM, vidit.asthana wrote:
> How can I issue a hard commit through SolrJ such that openSearcher=false?
>
> Also how can I issue same request through http? Will this work -
>
> curl
> "http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update?commit=true&openSearcher=false";
This SolrJ code
It shouldn't be any different without the patch, or with the patch and
(100,10) as parameters. Which is why I wanted you to check with 100,10.. If
you see the same issue with that, then the patch is probably not an issue,
may be it is with the patched build in general..
On 30 Mar 2015 13:01, "fores
Hi,
I saw there is a tool for reading solr into Spark RDD in JAVA
I want to do something like this in python, is there any package in python for
reading solr into spark RDD?
Thanks ,
Shani
-
Intel Electronics Ltd.
This e-mail
How can I issue a hard commit through SolrJ such that openSearcher=false?
Also how can I issue same request through http? Will this work -
curl
"http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update?commit=true&openSearcher=false";
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.c
If I want to group the results (by a certain field) even if there is
only 1 document, I should use the group parameter instead?
The requirement is to group the result of product documents by their
supplier id.
"&group=true&group.field=P_SupplierId&group.limit=5"
Is it true that the performance
I would never put spaces in my field names! Frankly I have no clue
what Solr does with that, but it can't be good. Solr explicitly
supports Java naming conventions, camel case, underscores and numbers.
Special symbols are frowned upon, I never use anything but upper case,
lower case and underscores
By now, I wouldn't particularly trust my setup. I'd blow it away and start over.
bootstrapping is _only_ required to get the configs up to Zookeeper
the first time. In fact I suggest you don't use it at all. Just start
SolrCloud, and use zkcli to push the configs up. Thereafter, create
your collec
How big is your index? -Xmx6g is pretty small in general.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:20 PM, sthita wrote:
> Thanks Erick for the reply. These are the configurations.
>
> 1.Solr servers count : 4 (1 master , 3 slaves)
> 2.My initial and maximum memory allocations to each solr servers are :
> -Xms5
We only want the conversion Hanja->Hangul, for each Hanja character there
exists only one Hangul character that can replace it in a Korean text.
The other way around is not convertible.
We want to allow searching in both scripts and find matches in both scripts.
Thanks
Eyal Naamati
Alma Develop
Latest information that I've found for this is that the error only occurs
for shard2.
If I do a search for just shard1, those records that are assigned to shard1
will be able to be displayed. Only when I search for shard2 will the
NullPointerException error occurs. Previously I was doing a search
The expanded section will only include groups that have expanded documents.
So, if the document that in the main result set has no documents to expand,
then this is working as expected.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi
>
> I
Hi Erick,
I've started shard2 with the following command instead, but it's still the
same problem.
java -DzkHost=localhost:9983 -Djetty.port=8984 -jar start.jar
But you mean for shard1 we do not have to include "
-Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/logmill/conf" for subsequent startup?
Regards,
Edwin
O
Hi Erick,
I've changed the uniqueKey from id to Item No.
Item No
Below are my definitions for both the id and Item No.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 March 2015 at 23:05, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled.
>
> It's definitely A Bad Thing t
Thanks Erick for the reply. These are the configurations.
1.Solr servers count : 4 (1 master , 3 slaves)
2.My initial and maximum memory allocations to each solr servers are :
-Xms5g
-Xmx6g
3. 5 running zookeepers
4. My index size in each solr server around: 48GB
5. Every sec merger add/delete 5
Saw that one. Can't remember for certain, but recall the actual syntax error
was in a filter query. It could have been a quoting error or a date math
error in a range expression. But, either way, the issue was in the fq. Using
edismax. hth
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [
One development difference is that i am trying to use it in a scala project.
I compile "spark-solr" as jar and use it in my scala project.
Do you think this might be a reason.
thanks
sumit
From: Purohit, Sumit
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:19 PM
To: solr-
Hi
I have a query which return 1 document.
When I add the collapse and expand parameters to it,
"&expand=true&expand.rows=5&fq={!collapse%20field=P_SupplierId}", the
expanded section is empty ().
Is this the behaviour of collapse and expand parameters on result which
contain only 1 document?
That's an open issue. See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6273
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Timothy Ehlers wrote:
> Can you use /replication ??? How would you do this between datacenters?
>
> --
> Tim Ehlers
>
Yes i am using default localhost:9983 and i think my program does connect with
zookeeper as per logs :
2015-03-30 15:00:51,512 [Executor task launch worker-0] INFO SolrZkClient -
Using default ZkCredentialsProvider
2015-03-30 15:00:51,530 [Executor task launch worker-0] INFO ConnectionManage
I upgraded the spark-solr project to solrj-5.0.0 and was able to index into
the gettingstarted collection using Solr 5.0.0, so seems like it may be
environmental. Almost seems like the spark project is looking at the wrong
ZooKeeper? Are you using the default -zkHost localhost:9983
On Mon, Mar 30,
Can you use /replication ??? How would you do this between datacenters?
--
Tim Ehlers
Hmmm, are you indexing during the time you see the deleted docs not
changing? Because this is very strange. Theoretically, if you reindex
everything, that should result in segments that have _no_ live docs in
them and they should really disappear ASAP.
One way to work around this if we determine t
Thanks Tim,
i had to make some changes in my local spark-solr clone to build it for sorl5.
If its ok, i can commit these to github.
thanks
sumit
From: Timothy Potter [thelabd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 2:27 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
Ok, let me upgrade my version of spark-solr to 5 to see what I get ...
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Purohit, Sumit
wrote:
> yes there is getting started collection..
> and on admin webpage console-->cloud--->tree--->/clusterstate.json shows
> me this table
>
> version =1
> aversion=0
> chi
yes there is getting started collection..
and on admin webpage console-->cloud--->tree--->/clusterstate.json shows me
this table
version =1
aversion=0
children_count=0
ctimeFri= Mar 27 19:20:21 UTC 2015 (1427484021901)
cversion=0
czxid=32
ephemeralOwner=0
mtime=Fri Mar 27 19:20:36 UTC 2015 (142
Anything in the server-side Solr logs? Also, if you go to the Solr admin
console at http://localhost:8983/solr, do you see the gettingstarted
collection in the cloud panel?
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Purohit, Sumit
wrote:
> I have a basic Solr 5.0.0 cloud setup after following
> http://l
I have a basic Solr 5.0.0 cloud setup after following
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/quickstart.html
I am trying to read data from spark and index it into solr using following lib:
https://github.com/LucidWorks/spark-solr
I am getting following error when my code try to make request to solr
Exc
Hi Vijay,
The short answer is yes, you can combine almost anything you want into a single
collection. But, in addition to working out your queries, you might want work
out your data life cycle.
In our application, we have comingled the structured and unstructured documents
into a single col
Hi Jing,
You can boost phrases by pf (phrase fields) parameter. If you don't like this
solution, you can modify search query at client side. E.g. surround certain
phrases with quotes. This will force proximity search without interfering with
tokenisation.
Ahmet
On Monday, March 30, 2015 8:49
Hi,
The way our collection is setup, searches for "breast cancer" are returning
results for ovarian cancer, or anything that contains either "breast" or
"cancer". The reason is, we are searching across multiple fields. Even though
I have set a "mm" value so that if less than 3 terms, ALL term
Hmmm, not OOB. You could index two tdate fields though and in the
second one only index seconds into the day and index the other with
date math (i.e. /DAY) to normalize them. Or a tdate field with just a
long field for the seconds.
You could then use the range faceting to, say, put the docs into h
OK, this is a bit confused:
1> You're starting two embedded Zookeepers but they don't know about
each other. So looking for the configsets is a bit confused.
2> There's no need to do the bootstrap thing after the first time. The
_very_ first time you do this it pushes the configs up to Zookeeper,
I suggest that you do not try to save money on disk space. Disk is cheap.
You will spend weeks of expensive engineering time trying to make this work.
Once you make it work, it will be slow an unreliable.
300GB Amazon EBS volumes are $180/year, $360/year for SSD. Just spend the money.
wunder
Wa
Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled.
It's definitely A Bad Thing to have it be any kind of tokenized field
though, but that's a shot in the dark.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Mostafa,
>
> Yes, I've defined all the f
Sometimes happens when your zookeeper timeout is short (the 15 second
timeout has been too short) and you hit a GC pause that is longer. Try
lengthening your ZK timeout to 45 or 60 seconds.
It would help if you told us about your setup, memory allocated to
Solr, all that stuff, see:
http://wiki.a
First examine whether you can reduce the amount of data you keep
around, field norms, stored fields, etc. Here's a place to start:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10080881/solr-index-size-reduction
I have heard of people doing what you suggest, but be _very_ careful
that you don't accidentally
But if the value can only be 100,10, is there any difference with no that
patch? Can we enlarge those 2 values? Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restart-solr-failed-after-applied-the-patch-in-https-issues-apache-org-jira-browse-SOLR-6359-tp4196251p4196
Why do you think that this is a good idea? Hanja are used for special
purposes; they are not trivally convertable to Hanjul due to ambiguity, and
it's not at all clear that a typical search user wants to treat them as
equivalent.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Eyal Naamati <
eyal.naam...@exlibri
Yes, I also doubt the patch. I restore the patch with original .jar file,
there is no that issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restart-solr-failed-after-applied-the-patch-in-https-issues-apache-org-jira-browse-SOLR-6359-tp4196251p4196278.html
Sent from the
Hi,
thanks for reply. We have a lot of deleted docs cause we have to reindex all
records from time to time, changing some important parameters.. When we do
update, it means create and delete.
Our deleted docs do not disappear by merging segments. I see our deleted
docs are almost the same number
Howdy folks,
Is there any way index only the date and time portions of a datetime field?
A Date is really a period of 24hrs, starting at 00:00 in said date's
time zone. It would be useful if there was a way to search for documents
of a certain date with these semantics.
As for times, I'd lik
I doubt this has anything to do with the patch. Do you observe the same
behaviour if you reduce the values for the config to defaults? (100, 10)
On 30 Mar 2015 09:51, "forest_soup" wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6359
>
> I also posted the questions to the JIRA ticket.
>
> We
I've roughly know what is the problem from here.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23338324/zookeeper-multiple-collection-different-schema
However, I couldn't find the zoo_data directory in all of my solr folder.
What could be the problem or where is the directory supposed to be located?
Regards
Hi Mostafa,
Yes, I've defined all the fields in schema.xml. It is able to work on the
version without SolrCloud, but it is not working for the one with SolrCloud.
Both of them are using the same schema.xml.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 March 2015 at 14:34, Mostafa Gomaa wrote:
> Hi Zheng,
>
> It's p
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6359
I also posted the questions to the JIRA ticket.
We have a SolrCloud with 5 solr servers of Solr 4.7.0. There are one
collection with 80 shards(2 replicas per shard) on those 5 servers. And we
made a patch by merge the patch
(https://issues.apache.or
Solr server crashes 2-3 times a day . When i looked into log i can see some
recovery failure.
I got these errors on my solr log
WARN - 2015-03-30 16:03:51.137; org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy;
Stopping recovery for zkNodeName=searcher:8980_solr_rn0core=rn0
ERROR - 2015-03-30 16:03:56.12
Many thanks Andrea, I followed your guidance:
the following site helped me to install and configure Ant in Windows
http://madhukaudantha.blogspot.com.es/2010/06/installing-ant-for-windows-7.html
Then after cloning the repository
https://github.com/LucidWorks/auto-phrase-tokenfilter I just run th
48 matches
Mail list logo
