On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Anurag Sharma wrote:
> I am wondering if there is any demo app that can demonstrate all the
> features/capabilities of solr. My intention is to understand, use and play
> around all the features supported by solr.
>
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_10_0/tutorial
Well, replicas _can_ cross data centers, there's nothing explicitly
preventing it. But the network latency will cause "interesting" problems,
not to mention ZooKeeper Quorum sensing being challenging. But your
description is accurate, there's no such thing as a "read only replica" in
SolrCloud.
Th
Hi-
I have been reading up on SolrCloud and it seems that it is not possible to
have a cross-datacenter read-only slave anymore but wanted to ask here to be
sure.
We currently have a pre Solr 4.0 installation with the master instance in our
US mid-west datacenter. The datacenter in Europe has r
Yes, that was it, thank you!
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Default_query_parser_operator ?
> once again, debugQuery=true perfectly explains what's going on with q.
>
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:24 AM,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Default_query_parser_operator ?
once again, debugQuery=true perfectly explains what's going on with q.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:24 AM, White, Bill wrote:
> It worked for me once I changed to
>
> -color:({* TO red} OR {red TO *})
>
> I'm not sure why the OR
It worked for me once I changed to
-color:({* TO red} OR {red TO *})
I'm not sure why the OR is needed, maybe it's my version? (4.6.1)
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> hm. try to convert it to query q=-color:({* TO red} {red TO *}) and che
hm. try to convert it to query q=-color:({* TO red} {red TO *}) and check
the explanation from debugQuery=true
I tried to play with my index
"q": "*:*",
"facet.field": "swatchColors_string_mv",
"fq": "-swatchColors_string_mv:({* TO RED} {RED TO *})",
I got the following facets:
Hmm. If I understand correctly this builds a set out of open intervals
(exclusive ranges), that's a great idea!
It doesn't seem to work for me, though; fq=-color:({* TO red} {red TO *})
is giving me results with color="burnt sienna"
The field is defined as
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Mik
Heh... very clever, Mikhail!
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet functions,
sub-facets, off-heap data
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> indeed!
> the exclusive range {green TO red} matches to the "lemon yellow"
> hence, the negation suppresses it
It's never possible. You have to reindex whole block.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:20 PM, bradhill99 wrote:
> Anyone can help me about this? or Solr not support adding additional
> children
> documents to existed parent document?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.
indeed!
the exclusive range {green TO red} matches to the "lemon yellow"
hence, the negation suppresses it from appearing
fq=-color:{green TO red}
then you need to suppress eg black and white also
fq=-color:({* TO green} {green TO red} {red TO *})
I have no control over the
> possible values of 'c
Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:46 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> > Hmm, that won't work since color is free-form.
> >
> > Is there a way to invoke (via fq) a user-defined function (hopefully
> > defined as part of the fq syntax, but alternativ
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:46 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> Hmm, that won't work since color is free-form.
>
> Is there a way to invoke (via fq) a user-defined function (hopefully
> defined as part of the fq syntax, but alternatively, written in Java) and
> have it applied to the resultset?
https://wik
OK, let me try phrasing it better.
How do I exclude from search, any result which contains any value for
multivalued field 'color' which is not within a given "constraint set"
(e.g., "red", "green", "yellow", "burnt sienna"), given that I do not what
any of the other possible values of 'color' are
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> but do NOT match ANY other color.
Bill, I miss the whole picture, it's worth to rephrase the problem in one
sentence.
But regarding the quote above, you can try to use exclusive ranges
https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_6_0/queryparser/org/ap
Hmm, that won't work since color is free-form.
Is there a way to invoke (via fq) a user-defined function (hopefully
defined as part of the fq syntax, but alternatively, written in Java) and
have it applied to the resultset?
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:36 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> Sorry, color is multivalued, so a given record might be both blue and red.
> I don't want those to show up in the results.
I think the only way currently (out of the box) is to enumerate the
other possible colors to exclude them.
color:(red y
Sorry, color is multivalued, so a given record might be both blue and red.
I don't want those to show up in the results.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:36 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> Not just that. I'm looking for things which match either red or yellow or
> green, but do NOT match ANY other color. I
Not just that. I'm looking for things which match either red or yellow or
green, but do NOT match ANY other color. I can probably drop the
requirement related to having no color.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> > He
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:52 PM, White, Bill wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've attempted to figure this out from reading the documentation but
> without much luck. I looked for a comprehensive query syntax specification
> (e.g., with BNF and a list of operator semantics) but I'm unable to find
> such a do
Hello,
I've attempted to figure this out from reading the documentation but
without much luck. I looked for a comprehensive query syntax specification
(e.g., with BNF and a list of operator semantics) but I'm unable to find
such a document (does such a thing exist? or is the syntax too much of a
I'm running into memory issues and wondering if I should be using
expungeDeletes on commits. The server in question at the moment has
450k documents in the collection and represents 15GB on disk. There are
also 700k+ "Deleted Docs" and I'm guessing that is part of the disk
space consumption b
And how is the schema field declared. Seems like it's a TrieDoubleField,
which should be a simple floating point value. You should be using the
spatial field types.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucen
I am wondering if there is any demo app that can demonstrate all the
features/capabilities of solr. My intention is to understand, use and play
around all the features supported by solr.
Also looking to explore how solr fits with NLP (like open-nlp), different
datastores (like cassandra, mongodb,
I am trying to understand how the schema and it's field types gets applied
to a document. Is it based on a document Id e.g. how to specify solr to
store fields like age as integer, dateofbirth as date but not as a string
or vice versa. Also, is it possible to change the field type at runtime?
Dire
25 matches
Mail list logo
