http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Default_query_parser_operator ?
once again, debugQuery=true perfectly explains what's going on with q.

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 1:24 AM, White, Bill <bwh...@ptfs.com> wrote:

> It worked for me once I changed to
>
> -color:({* TO red} OR {red TO *})
>
> I'm not sure why the OR is needed, maybe it's my version? (4.6.1)
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> > hm. try to convert it to query q=-color:({* TO red} {red TO *}) and check
> > the explanation from debugQuery=true
> >
> > I tried to play with my index
> >
> >       "q": "*:*",
> >       "facet.field": "swatchColors_string_mv",
> >       "fq": "-swatchColors_string_mv:({* TO RED} {RED TO *})",
> >
> > I got the following facets:
> >
> >   "facet_fields": {
> >       "swatchColors_string_mv": [
> >         "RED",
> >         122,
> >         "BLACK",
> >         0,
> >         "BLUE",
> >         0,
> >         "BROWN",
> >         0,
> >         "GREEN",
> >         0,
> >
> > so, it works for me at least...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:54 AM, White, Bill <bwh...@ptfs.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm.  If I understand correctly this builds a set out of open intervals
> > > (exclusive ranges), that's a great idea!
> > >
> > > It doesn't seem to work for me, though;  fq=-color:({* TO red} {red TO
> > *})
> > > is giving me results with color="burnt sienna"
> > >
> > > The field is defined as <field name="color" type="string"
> indexed="true"
> > > stored="true" multiValued="true" />
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> > > mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > indeed!
> > > > the exclusive range {green TO red} matches to the "lemon yellow"
> > > > hence, the negation suppresses it from appearing
> > > > fq=-color:{green TO red}
> > > > then you need to suppress eg black and white also
> > > > fq=-color:({* TO green} {green TO red} {red TO *})
> > > >
> > > > I have no control over the
> > > > > possible values of 'color',
> > > >
> > > > You don't need to control possible values, you just suppressing any
> > > values
> > > > beside of the given green and red.
> > > > Mind that either green or red passes that negation of exclusive
> ranges
> > > > disjunction.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:15 AM, White, Bill <bwh...@ptfs.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK, let me try phrasing it better.
> > > > >
> > > > > How do I exclude from search, any result which contains any value
> for
> > > > > multivalued field 'color' which is not within a given "constraint
> > set"
> > > > > (e.g., "red", "green", "yellow", "burnt sienna"), given that I do
> not
> > > > what
> > > > > any of the other possible values of 'color' are?
> > > > >
> > > > > In pseudocode:
> > > > >
> > > > > for all x in result.color
> > > > >     if x not in ("red","green","yellow", "burnt sienna")
> > > > >         filter out result
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see how range queries would work since I have no control
> over
> > > the
> > > > > possible values of 'color', e.g., there could be a valid color
> "lemon
> > > > > yellow" between "green" and "red", and I don't want a result which
> > has
> > > > > (color: red, color: "lemon yellow")
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
> > > > > mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:36 PM, White, Bill <bwh...@ptfs.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > but do NOT match ANY other color.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bill, I miss the whole picture, it's worth to rephrase the
> problem
> > in
> > > > one
> > > > > > sentence.
> > > > > > But regarding the quote above, you can try to use exclusive
> ranges
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_6_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/classic/package-summary.html#Range_Searches
> > > > > > fq=-color:({* TO green} {green TO red} {red TO *})
> > > > > > just don't forget to build ranges alphabetically
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > > > Principal Engineer,
> > > > > > Grid Dynamics
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> > > > > > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > Principal Engineer,
> > > > Grid Dynamics
> > > >
> > > > <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> > > > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> > Principal Engineer,
> > Grid Dynamics
> >
> > <http://www.griddynamics.com>
> > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
> >
>



-- 
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
Principal Engineer,
Grid Dynamics

<http://www.griddynamics.com>
<mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>

Reply via email to