On 4/28/2014 7:54 PM, Xavier Morera wrote:
> Would anyone be so kind to explain what are the "Raw query parameters"
> in Solr's admin UI. I can't find an explanation in either the reference
> guide nor wiki nor web search.
The query API supports a lot more parameters than are shown on the admin
UI
Not out of the box, as far as I know.
Custom UpdateRequestProcessor could possibly do some sort of expansion
of the field name by verifying the actual schema. Not sure if API
supports that level of flexibility. Or, for latest Solr, you can
request the list of known field names via REST and do clie
1. might be too expensive in terms of commits and performance of
refreshing the index every time.
3. Have you looked at external fields, custom components, etc. For example:
http://www.slideshare.net/lucenerevolution/potter-timothy-boosting-documents-in-solr
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Comb
Yes, but with my query *country:"USA" * it is returning me languages
belonging to countries other than USA.
Is there any way I can avoid such languages appearing in my facet filters?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Selectively-hiding-SOLR-facets-tp4132770p
Hi,
Would anyone be so kind to explain what are the "Raw query parameters" in
Solr's admin UI. I can't find an explanation in either the reference guide
nor wiki nor web search.
[image: Inline image 1]
A bit confused on what it actually is for
[image: Inline image 3]
Thanks in advance,
Xavier
-
Our team is upgrading to solr 4.7.0 and running into an issue with
indexing an array of map objects in solr 4.7.0.
I understand that it makes no sense to index an array of map objects
to solr, but I want to figure out why certain error outputs are coming
out of the solr box.
So we have a document
Adding positionIncrementGap="1" to the fields worked for me. I didn't
re-index all the existing docs so it works for only future documents.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> Hi Vijay,
>
> It is a index time setting so yes solr restart and re-indexing is
> required. So
Hi Vijay,
It is a index time setting so yes solr restart and re-indexing is required. So
A small test case would be handy
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:35 AM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
Thanks Ahmet, I'll give that a try. Do I need to re-index to add/update
positionIncrementGap?
On Mon, Apr
I tried testing with positionIncrementGap but that didn't work. The values
I passed for it were 0, 1, 4,100.
Reindexing also didn't help.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Vijay Kokatnur wrote:
> Thanks Ahmet, I'll give that a try. Do I need to re-index to add/update
> positionIncrementGap?
>
Thanks Ahmet, I'll give that a try. Do I need to re-index to add/update
positionIncrementGap?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would add positionIncrementGap to fieldType definitions and experiment
> with different values. 0, 1 and 100.
>
>
> positionIncrementG
Hi,
I would add positionIncrementGap to fieldType definitions and experiment with
different values. 0, 1 and 100.
Same with OrderLineType too
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:25 AM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
Hey Ehmet,
Here is the field def -
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ahme
Hey Ehmet,
Here is the field def -
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you paste your field definition of BookingRecordId and OrderLineType?
> It could be something related to positionIncrementGap.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 12:58 AM,
Hello,
Thank you! I will try out what you suggested and post back once I know
more.
yes given things like
cat foo bar
house foo bar
foo bar
I want to know when the term "foo bar" (but not the prefix cases I specify)
exists in my documents.
Thanks!
Evan
--
View this message in context:
htt
Hi,
Can you paste your field definition of BookingRecordId and OrderLineType? It
could be something related to positionIncrementGap.
Ahmet
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 12:58 AM, Ethan wrote:
Facing the same problem!! I have noticed it works fine as long as you're
looking up the first index pos
No, though one could write a custom SearchComponent, I imagine. Not
terribly useful for most situations where queries typically run for only a
few milliseconds, but
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On Thu,
Facing the same problem!! I have noticed it works fine as long as you're
looking up the first index position.
Anyone faced similar problem before?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Vijay Kokatnur
wrote:
> I have been working on SpanQuery for some time now to look up multivalued
> fields and fou
Thanks James, I was afraid of that. The problem is that spellcheck.q Is not
always provided by the users and therefore it gives wrong suggestions. I'll
just turn off spellcheck by default.
Cheers,
Jeroen
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingramcontent.com]
Sent: m
spellcheck.q is supposed to take a list of raw query terms, so what you're
trying to do in your example won't work. What you should do instead is
space-delimit the actual query terms that exist in "qq" and (nothing else) use
that for your value of spellcheck.q .
James Dyer
Ingram Content Gro
Hi Evan,
If I understand correctly, a document has to have at least one "foo bar"
without having "cat" in front.
A solution would be to use a combination of the ShingleFilterFactory and query
for one occurences of "foo bar" using the termfreq function.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/displ
Hi,
I'm having some trouble using the spellcheck.q parameter. The user's query is
defined in the qq parameter and q parameter contains several other parameters
for boosting.
I would like to use the qq parameter as a default for spellcheck.q.
I tried several ways of adding the qq parameter in the
I have been working on SpanQuery for some time now to look up multivalued
fields and found one more issue -
Now if a document has following lookup fields among others
"*BookingRecordId*": [ "100268421", "190131", "8263325" ],
"*OrderLineType*": [ "13", "1", "11" ],
Here is the query I construc
Hi,
We are using solr in production system for around ~500 users and we have
around ~1 queries per day.
Our user's search topics most of the time static and repeat themselves over
time.
We have in our system an option to specify "specific search subject" (we
also call it "specific information
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your prompt response!
I have added filters which you have specified but still its not working.
Below is field Query Analyzer
http://localhost:8080/solr/master/select?q=page_title_t:*products*
http://localhos
I did, but it looks like I mixed in the chroot too after every entry rather
than once at the very end (thanks to David Smiley for catching that). I'll
try again and update if it's still a problem.
Thanks!
-Scott
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Have you tried a comma-sep
Thanks jack for prompt response!
So is there any solution to make this scenario works?
Or wildcard doesn't work with special characters and numerics?
Thanks,
G. Naresh Kumar
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-search-not-working-with-search-term-havin
Hello,
Here is a better use case
Documents A, B, C, and D
A: "dear foo bar hello"
B: "dear cat foo bar hello"
C: "dear cat foo bar hello foo bar"
D: "dear car foo bar"
I have a dictionary of items outside of solr
"foo bar" and "cat foo bar"
And associated with each item is the set of "suffix's
Hi guys,
Would be possible, using Atomic Updates in SOLR4, to remove all fields
matching a pattern? For instance something like:
100
<*field name="*_name_i" update="set" null="true">*
Or something similar to remove certain fields in all documents.
Thanks,
Costi
Pretty neat. Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure how OR clauses are executed.
>
> But after re-reading your mail, I think you can use SpanOrQuery (for your
> q1) in your custom query parser plugin.
>
> val q2 = new SpanOrQuery(
>
28 April 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.8.0 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.8.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted s
Hi Evan,
Confusing use case :)
You don't want "foo bar" is prefixed with "cat" ?
But you are ok with a document that has "cat foo bar"
Isn't this contradiction?
On Monday, April 28, 2014 6:26 PM, Evan Smith wrote:
Hello,
I would like to find all documents that have say "foo bar" with a
Hi Naresh,
quotes are only meaningful when there are two or more terms. don't use quotes
for products* and product*.
As regarding stemming and wildcards, use following chain, and your wildcard
searches will be happier.
Ahmet
On Monday, April 28, 2014 5:41 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
Wild
Hello,
I would like to find all documents that have say "foo bar" with a filter to
remove any cases where "foo bar" is prefixed with things like "cat", "a",
...
I am ok with a document that has "cat foo bar" and "foo bar", but if it
only has "cat foo bar" then I don't want it while if it has "fo
Wildcards and stemming are incompatible at query time - you need to manually
stem the term before applying your wildcard.
Wildcards are not supported in quoted phrases. They will be treated as
punctuation, and ignored by the standard tokenizer or the word delimiter
filter.
-- Jack Krupansky
Wildcard query only works for single terms. Any embedded special characters
will cause a term to be split into multiple terms at index time. The use of
a wildcard in a query term with embedded special characters will bypass
normal analysis - you need to enter the term exactly as it would be anal
On 4/28/2014 5:05 AM, Mukesh Jha wrote:
> Thanks Erik,
>
> Sounds about right.
>
> BTW how long can I keep adding collections i.e. can I keep 5/10 years data
> like this?
>
> Also what do you think of bullet 2) of having collection specific
> configurations in zookeeper?
Regarding bullet 2, the
Hello Shawn,
Thanks for your reply, that's good news!
All the best.
2014-04-28 15:28 GMT+02:00 Shawn Heisey :
> On 4/28/2014 3:33 AM, Amanjit Gill wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Considering a solr cloud configuration (4.6+)
> >
> > a) I am wondering if the solr replication handler always has
Can some one please help me with this as I am struck with this issue..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-search-not-working-with-search-term-having-special-characters-and-digits-tp4133385p4133478.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
Can some one please help me with this as I am struck with this issue..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stemming-not-working-with-wildcard-search-tp4133382p4133477.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 4/28/2014 3:33 AM, Amanjit Gill wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Considering a solr cloud configuration (4.6+)
>
> a) I am wondering if the solr replication handler always has to be
> configured completely, aka by choosing one master, then setting the config
> accordingly (enable, masterUrl) etc ...
Yes, according to this documentation:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/MergingSolrIndexes
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Gastone Penzo wrote:
> Hi,
> it's possible to merge 2 shards indexes into one?
>
> Thank you
>
> --
> *Gastone Penzo*
>
--
Dmitry
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitte
Thanks Erik,
Sounds about right.
BTW how long can I keep adding collections i.e. can I keep 5/10 years data
like this?
Also what do you think of bullet 2) of having collection specific
configurations in zookeeper?
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> So you're talking abo
Hi everybody,
Considering a solr cloud configuration (4.6+)
a) I am wondering if the solr replication handler always has to be
configured completely, aka by choosing one master, then setting the config
accordingly (enable, masterUrl) etc ... Do we really need a replication
master?
solrconfig.xm
Why wouldn't you take advantage of your use case - the chars belong to
different char classes.
You can index this field to a single solr field (no copyField) and apply an
analysis chain that includes both languages analysis - stopword, stemmers
etc.
As every filter should apply to its' specific la
Hi,
it's possible to merge 2 shards indexes into one?
Thank you
--
*Gastone Penzo*
On 28 April 2014 12:42, PAVAN wrote:
>
> I have indexed title in the following way.
>
> honda cars in rajaji nagar
> honda cars in rajajinagar.
>
> suppose if i search for
>
> honda cars in rajainagar (OR)
> honda cars in rajaji nagar
>
> it has to display both the results.
Please do not start mu
I have indexed title in the following way.
honda cars in rajaji nagar
honda cars in rajajinagar.
suppose if i search for
honda cars in rajainagar (OR)
honda cars in rajaji nagar
it has to display both the results.
Anybody help me how can we do this.
--
View this message in context:
46 matches
Mail list logo