I tried testing with positionIncrementGap but that didn't work. The values
I passed for it were 0, 1, 4,100.
Reindexing also didn't help.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Vijay Kokatnur <kokatnur.vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks Ahmet, I'll give that a try. Do I need to re-index to add/update
> positionIncrementGap?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would add positionIncrementGap to fieldType definitions and experiment
>> with different values. 0, 1 and 100.
>>
>>
>> <fieldType name="token" class="solr.TextField" omitNorms="true"
>> positionIncrementGap="1">
>>
>> Same with OrderLineType too
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:25 AM, Vijay Kokatnur <
>> kokatnur.vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Ehmet,
>>
>> Here is the field def -
>>
>> <field name="BookingRecordId" type="token" indexed="true" stored="true"
>> multiValued="true" omitTermFreqAndPositions="false"/>
>>
>> <fieldType name="token" class="solr.TextField" omitNorms="true">
>> <analyzer>
>> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> <filter
>> class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> </analyzer> </fieldType>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Can you paste your field definition of BookingRecordId and
>> OrderLineType?
>> > It could be something related to positionIncrementGap.
>> >
>> > Ahmet
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 12:58 AM, Ethan <eh198...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Facing the same problem!! I have noticed it works fine as long as you're
>> > looking up the first index position.
>> >
>> > Anyone faced similar problem before?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Vijay Kokatnur
>> > <kokatnur.vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have been working on SpanQuery for some time now to look up
>> multivalued
>> > > fields and found one more issue -
>> > >
>> > > Now if a document has following lookup fields among others
>> > >
>> > > "*BookingRecordId*": [ "100268421", "190131", "8263325" ],
>> > >
>> > > "*OrderLineType*": [ "13", "1", "11" ],
>> > >
>> > > Here is the query I construct -
>> > >
>> > > val q1 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("BookingRecordId", "100268421"))
>> > > val q2 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term("OrderLineType", "13"))
>> > > val q2m = new FieldMaskingSpanQuery(q2, "BookingRecordId")
>> > > val sp = Array[SpanQuery](q1, q2m)
>> > >
>> > > val q = new SpanNearQuery(sp, -1, false)
>> > >
>> > > Query to find element at first index position works fine -
>> > >
>> > > *{!span} BookingRecordId: 100268421 +OrderLineType:13*
>> > > but query to find element at third index position doesn't return any
>> > > result. -
>> > >
>> > > *{!span} BookingRecordId: 8263325 +OrderLineType:11 *
>> > >
>> > > If I increase the slope to 4 then it returns correct result. But it
>> also
>> > > matches BookingRecordId: 100268421 with OrderLineType:11 which is
>> > incorrect.
>> > >
>> > > I thought SpanQuery works for any multiValued field size. Any ideas
>> how
>> > I
>> > > can fix this?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > -Vijay
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
