I'm using solr 4.0 with DIH jdbc connector and I use Solr Admin web interface
for testing. I have a field called *ratings* which varies like 0, 0.3, 0.5,
0.75, 1, 1.5, 1.6... and so on as per user input.
I found the link
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-round-solr-score-td495198.html
<
I don't use Cygwin, but I guess it's similar in that in Windows there
are no signals at all so situation with missing shutdown hooks is the same.
31.07.2013 20:54, Chris Hostetter пишет:
: it's Windows 7. I'm starting Jetty with java -jar start.jar
Not sure if you are using cygwin, or if this
Thank you very much!,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-list-all-records-but-fq-matching-records-first-tp4081572p4081826.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
An annotation field would be much better than the current "anything goes"
schema-less schema.xml.
Has anyone built an XML Schema for schema.xml? I know it is extensible, but it
would be worth a try.
wunder
On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> In thinking about making the entire So
In thinking about making the entire Solr schema REST-API-addressable
(SOLR-4898), I'd like to be able to add arbitrary metadata at both the top
level of the schema and at each leaf node, and allow read/write access to that
metadata via the REST API.
Some uses I've thought of for such a facility
Hi,
I am trying to create a debian package for solr 4.3 (default installation
with jetty).
Is there anything already available?
Also, I need 3 different cores so plan to create corresponding packages for
each of them to create solr core using admin/cores or collections api.
I also want to use
I have setup solr cloud and when I try to access documents I get this error,
no servers hosting shard: 503
However if I add shards=shard1 param it works.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/no-servers-hosting-shard-tp4081783.html
Sent from the Solr - User maili
If your issue is that you want to retrieve the number of groups,
group.ngroups will return the sum of the number of groups per shard.
This is not the number of groups overall as there if some groups are present
on more than one shard.
To make sure that this does not happen, one can choose to dist
Thanks Walter,
Existing media sets will rarely change but new media sets will be added
relatively frequently. (There is a many to many relationship between media
sets and media sources.) Given the size of data, a new Media Set that only
includes 1% of the collection would include 6 million rows.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> there is however a "group.cache.percent" option tha you might look into --
> but i honestly have no idea if that toggles the use of queryResultCache or
> something else, i havn't played with it before...
That's only a single-request cache
No, I haven't had time for that (and unlikely won't have for the next few
weeks), but it is on the list - if it is 25% improvement, it would be
really worth of the change to G1.
Thanks,
roman
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Did you also test indexing speed? With default
> Hey Bryan, Thanks for the response! To make use of the
> FastVectorHighlighter
> you need to enable termVectors, termPositions, and termOffsets correct?
> Which takes a considerable amount of space, but is good to know and I
may
> possibly pursue this solution as well. Just starting to look at
Hi all,
I am seeing some inconsistent behavior with facets, specifically range facets,
on Solr 4.3. Running the same query several times (pressing F5 on the browser)
produces different facet ranges when doing distributed searches, as some times
it doesn't include some of the "buckets". The resu
Just an update. Change was pretty straight forward (at least for my simple
test case) just a few lines in the getBestFragments method seemed to do the
trick.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-externally-stored-text-tp4078387p4081748.html
Sent from
Hi Siva,
I think I mention this several days ago... DYM ReSearcher will do that:
http://sematext.com/products/dym-researcher/index.html
Otis
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013, sivaprasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to "auto correct" the Solr query and get the results? For
> example, user tries t
the list of IDs does change relatively frequently, but this doesn't seem to
have very much impact on the performance of the query as far as I can tell.
attached are the stacks
thanks,
steve
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31
: it's quite long but this request uses both faceting and grouping. If I
: remove the grouping then the cache is used. Is this a normal behavior or
: a bug?
I believe that is expected -- i don't think grouping can take advantage of
the queryResultCache because of how it collects documents.
th
Also we do not have any useFilterForSortedQuery in our config. So we are
relying on the default which I guess is false.
From: Jean-Sebastien Vachon
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 3:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: queryResultCache showi
Ok I might have found an Solr issue after I fixed a problem in our system.
This the kind of query we are making:
http://10.0.5.214:8201/solr/Current/select?fq=position_refreshed_date_id:[2747%20TO%203501]&fq=position_soc_2011_8_code:41101100&fq=country_id:1&fq=position_job_type_id:4&fq=position_e
Hi Mark
Yes, it is something we implemented also. We just try various subsets of the
search terms when there are zero results. To increase performance for all
these searches we return only the first three results and no facets so we can
simply display the result counts for the various subsets
Hey Bryan, Thanks for the response! To make use of the FastVectorHighlighter
you need to enable termVectors, termPositions, and termOffsets correct?
Which takes a considerable amount of space, but is good to know and I may
possibly pursue this solution as well. Just starting to look at the code
Looks like the problem might not be related to Solr but to a proprietary system
we have on top of it.
I made some queries with facets and the cache was updated. We are looking into
this... I should not have assumed that the problem was coming from Solr ;)
I'll let you know if there is anything
Thanks to Ryan Ernst, my issue is duplicate of SOLR-4449.
I think that this proposal might be very useful (some supporting links are
attached there. worth reading..)
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Isaac Hebsh wrote:
> Hi,
> I submitted a new JIRA for this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
Hello Paul,
Can you please explain what you mean by:
"To get the exact number of groups, you need to shard along your grouping
field"
Thanks! :)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Paul Masurel wrote:
> Do you mean you get different results with group=true?
> numFound is supposed returns the numb
: We just configured a new Solr cloud (5 nodes) running Solr 4.3, ran
: about 200 000 queries taken from our production environment and measured
: the performance of the cloud over a collection of 14M documents with the
: default Solr settings. We are now trying to tune the different caches
:
: it's Windows 7. I'm starting Jetty with java -jar start.jar
Not sure if you are using cygwin, or if this is related but...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3884
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3884?focusedCommentId=13462996&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpan
: Can I expect the FieldCache of Lucene to return the correct values when
: working
: with TrieField with the precisionStep higher than 0. If not, what did I get
: wrong?
Yes -- the code for building FieldCaches from Trie fields is smart enough
to ensure that only the "real" original values are
Awesome Jack Krupansky-2!!!. It seems to work!.
What I didn't understand is *^100*. Could you give some explanation on ^100
please? if it could be any number other than 100?.
Thanks a lot!, I was working on this for past 3 days!.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabb
I was going to say 10, but frequently people find that they need a really
big boost.
Normally, a boost might be 1.5 or 2 or 5, or something like that.
A fractional boost, like 0.5, 0.25, 0.1, or even 0.01 can de-emphasize
terms.
If you add debugQuery=true to your query request and look at th
Can someone explain how one would go about providing alternative searches for a
query… similar to Amazon.
For example say I search for "Red Dump Truck"
- 0 results for "Red Dump Truck"
- 500 results for " Red Truck"
- 350 results for "Dump Truck"
Does this require multiple searches?
Thanks
On 7/31/2013 11:20 AM, Simonian, Marta M (US SSA) wrote:
Does anybody know if Solr performs better on Jetty vs Tomcat?
Jetty has less complexity than tomcat. It is likely to use less memory.
If you went with default settings for both, jetty is likely to perform
better, but the difference wo
Does anybody know if Solr performs better on Jetty vs Tomcat?
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley (@MITRE.org) [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ingesting geo data into Solr very slow
Hi Marta,
Presumably you a
Hi guys,
Here is the reply I got from the solr group. I'll change those settings. It's
good to know that it doesn't matter if we use the bean vs solr doc.
-Marta
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley (@MITRE.org) [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:08 PM
To: solr
Ok, thanks. I will check it.
On Jul 31, 2013, at 5:08 PM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
> See:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-Artifacts-4.x/javadoc/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
>
> I have more examples in my book.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> F
Did you also test indexing speed? With default G1GC settings we're seeing a
slightly higher latency for queries than CMS. However, G1GC allows for much
higher throughput than CMS when indexing. I haven't got the raw numbers here
but it is roughly 45 minutes against 60 in favour of G1GC!
Load is
A dot release should never require reindexing, unless... there is some
change in a field type analyzer or update processor that your data depends
on.
For example, some changes occurred in the ngram filter, so whether that
would impact your data is up to you to decide.
See:
https://issues.apa
Thanks shawn for the reply. I would upgrade to solr 4.3 and check that.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/31/2013 4:27 AM, Sinduja Rajendran wrote:
> > I am running solr 4.0 in a cloud. We have close to 100Mdocuments. The
> data
> > is from a single DB table. I use di
I'll try to run it with the new parameters and let you know how it goes.
I've rechecked details for the G1 (default) garbage collector run and I can
confirm that 2 out of 3 runs were showing high max response times, in some
cases even 10secs, but the customized G1 never - so definitely the
paramete
We have SolrCloud (4.3.0) cluster (5 shards and 2 replicas) on 10 boxes. We
have about 450 million documents. We're planning to upgrade to Solr 4.4.0. Do
We need to re-index already indexed documents?
Thanks!
This is awesome news. I had been looking for the ability to do this with
SolrCloud since 4.0.0-ALPHA. We're on 4.1.0 right now, so this is a great
reason to plan for an upgrade.
Just to be clear, CREATEALIAS both creates and updates an alias, right?
--
View this message in context:
http://luce
Thanks for all answers. We decided to use VisualVM with multiple remote
connections.
-Original Message-
From: Utkarsh Sengar [mailto:utkarsh2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: monitor jvm heap size for solrcloud
We have been
Hi Dmitry,
probably mistake in the readme, try calling it with -q
/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/queries/demo/demo.queries
as for the base_url, i was testing it on solr4.0, where it tries contactin
/solr/admin/system - is it different for 4.3? I guess I should make it
configurable (it alread
Flavio,
There was a problem with the solrconfig and schema files.
One of the team members had deleted some entries in the solrconfig.xml and I
was picking the same solr configuration everytime, I got the latest version
of solr and carefully edited the solrconfig and schema files and it worked.
See:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-Artifacts-4.x/javadoc/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
I have more examples in my book.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Luís Portela Afonso
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Su
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Carmine Paternoster
wrote:
>
Try datasource => dataSource in:
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. This check will be (eventually) part of SolrLint:
https://github.com/arafalov/SolrLint/issues/7
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedi
in my db-data-config.xml i have configured two datasource, each with his
parameter name, for example:
but when in solr from dataimport i execute the second entity-name-query i
On 7/31/2013 9:21 AM, Cool Techi wrote:
> Would it make sense if we open a newSearcher with the last 15 days documents?
> since these is the documents which are mostly used by the users. Also, how
> could i do this if this is possible?
When you open a searcher, it's for the entire index. You ma
Well, assuming you have solved the differences
in statistics between the index you maintain and
the one in the cloud with respect to the scoring...
My comment about indexing is probably
irrelevant, you're not indexing anything to the
SolrCloud cluster.
But still doubt this will work. Here's the p
Hum, ok.
It's possible to add to a field, static text? Text that i write on the
configuration and then append another field? I saw something like
CloneFieldProcessor but when i'm starting solr, it says that could not find the
class.
I was trying to use processors to move one field to another.
Thanks Anshum,
autoSoftCommit was alread set to 1000ms, but I changed the autoCommit to
3 minutes.
I'll wait for it to come back. The index contains about 200.000
documents and the last commit was 14 hours ago. So I wonder how long it
will take.
I would have thought it would be back up alre
Would it make sense if we open a newSearcher with the last 15 days documents?
since these is the documents which are mostly used by the users. Also, how
could i do this if this is possible?
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:54:47 -0600
> From: s...@elyograg.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sub
OK,
Then I would suggest creating multiValued enclosure_type, etc. tags for
searching, and then one string-typed field to store the JSON snippet you've
been showing.
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062 | c: +1 917 477 7906
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Ma
As a single record? Hum, no.
So an Rss has /rss/channel/ and then lot of /rss/channel/item, right?
Each /rss/channel/item is a new document on Solr. I start with the solr example
rss, but i change that to has more fields, other fields and get the feed url
from a database.
So each /rss/channel/i
So you're trying to index a RSS feed as a single record, but you want to be
able to search for and retrieve individual entries from within the feed? Is
that the issue?
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062 | c: +1 917 477 7906
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence M
On 7/31/2013 12:24 AM, William Bell wrote:
> But that link does not tell me which on you are using?
>
> You are listing like 4 versions on your site.
>
> Also, what did it fix? Pause times?
>
>
> Any other words of wisdom ?
I'm not sure whether that was directed at me or Roman, but here's my
a
Thank you very much for that information, Erick. That was what I was
fearing...
Well, the problem, why I am trying to do this is, that the SolrCloud is
managed by someone else. We are indexing some content to a pretty small
local index. To this index we have complete access and can do whatever
we
This fields can be multiValued.
I the rss standart there is not correct to do that, but some sources do and i
like to grab it all. Is there any way that make it possible?
Once again, Many thanks :)
On Jul 31, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Michael Della Bitta
wrote:
> Luís,
>
> Is there a reason why spli
Luís,
Is there a reason why splitting this up into enclosure_type, enclosure_url,
and enclosure_length would not work?
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062 | c: +1 917 477 7906
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Marketing”
18 East 41st Street
New York, NY 10
On 7/31/2013 7:30 AM, Cool Techi wrote:
> We have a solr master slave set up with close to 30 million records. Our
> index changes/updates very frequently and replication is set up at 60 seconds
> delay.
>
> Now every time replication completes, the new searches take a time. How can
> this be i
On 7/31/2013 7:16 AM, Vineet Mishra wrote:
> I checked the File. . .nothing is there. I mean the formatting is correct,
> its a valid XML file.
What version of Solr, and how large is your XML file?
If Solr is older than version 4.1, then the POST buffer limit is decided
by your container config,
On 7/30/2013 11:22 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I see, thanks. I thought that 'disk cache' was something on disk, such
> as swap space. The server is already maxed out on RAM:
> $ free -m
> total used free sharedbuffers
> cached
> Mem: 14980 14906 7
Hi,
I'm trying to index information of RSS Feeds.
So in a more detailed explanation:
The RSS feed has something like:
http://www.engadget.com/podcasts/Engadget_Podcast_353.mp3";
length="32642192" type="audio/mpeg"/>
With my current configuration, this is working and i get a result like that:
It perhaps is just replaying the transaction logs and coming up. Wait for
it is what I'd say.
The admin UI as of now doesn't show replaying of transaction log as
'recovering', it does so only during peer sync.
Also, you may want to add autoSoftCommit and increase the autoCommit to a
few minutes.
You're in uncharted territory. I can imagine you use
a SolrCloud cluster as a separate Solr for a federated
search, but using it as a single shard just seems wrong.
If nothing else, indexing to the shards will require that
the documents be routed correctly. But having one
shard in SolrCloud and an
Nope. Solr fields are flat. Why do you want to do this? I'm
asking because this might be an XY problems and there
may be other possibilities.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Luís Portela Afonso
wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to create a field with multiple fields inside, that is:
>
> origin
Right. The big difference is that the TermsComponent can't
give you any suggestions that are NOT in your index. So
if someone just misspells a word there's no real way to
say "this term is similar" using straight TermsComponent.
Also, the TermsComponent takes a prefix. So a nonsense
prefix won't s
Hi,
After the following error, one of the replicas of the leader went down.
"Error opening new searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,
try again later."
I increased the autoCommit time to 5000ms and restarted Solr.
However, the status is still set to "down".
How do I get it back to
On 7/31/2013 4:27 AM, Sinduja Rajendran wrote:
> I am running solr 4.0 in a cloud. We have close to 100Mdocuments. The data
> is from a single DB table. I use dih.
> Our solrCloud has 3 zookeepers, one tomcat, 2 solr instances in same
> tomcat. We have 8 GB Ram.
>
> After indexing 14M, my indexing
Ok, got the error fixed by modifying the base solr ulr in solrjmeter.py
(added core name after /solr part).
Next error is:
WARNING: no test name(s) supplied nor found in:
['/home/dmitry/projects/lab/solrjmeter/demo/queries/demo.queries']
It is a 'slow start with new tool' symptom I guess.. :)
O
OK. On ubuntu there are shell scripts that come with jetty 9. They seem to
do the proper job (disclaimer: not yet extensive testing with solr done,
but looks good so far).
Not sure, how well jetty supports win environment on the life-cycle
automation side.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Artem K
Hi Roman,
What version and config of SOLR does the tool expect?
Tried to run, but got:
**ERROR**
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1390, in
main(sys.argv)
File "solrjmeter.py", line 1296, in main
check_prerequisities(options)
File "solrjmeter.py", line 351, in check_prerequisities
e
Hi,
We have a solr master slave set up with close to 30 million records. Our index
changes/updates very frequently and replication is set up at 60 seconds delay.
Now every time replication completes, the new searches take a time. How can
this be improved? I have come across that warming would h
Thanks for the reply Erick. I'm looking for type-ahead support; using
spell checking too via the DirectSolrSpellChecker. Seems like the
spell check based suggester is designed for type-head or am I not
understanding something? Here's my config:
explicit
json
I checked the File. . .nothing is there. I mean the formatting is correct,
its a valid XML file.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> This file is malformed:
>
> *SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unexpected character '<'
> (code 60) expected '='*
> * at [row,col {
A filter query is used to exclude all documents that do not match - it is an
"AND" operation. In your case, you don't want to exclude documents, so...
you can't use a filter query.
What people typically do for your use case is to add an "OR" clause or a
"bq" boost query that merely boosts docu
Good to note!
But... any "search" will not detect dupe IDs for uncommitted documents.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:11 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: How might one search for dupe IDs other than faceting on the ID
field?
Hi,
I have managed to attach the patch in Jira.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 2:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: new field type - enum field
OK, if you can attach it to an e-mail, I'll atta
This file is malformed:
*SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unexpected character '<'
(code 60) expected '='*
* at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [20281,18]*
Check row 20281 column 18
-Original message-
> From:Vineet Mishra
> Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013 15:05
> To: solr-use
Hi All
I am currently stuck in a Solr Issue while Posting some data to Solr Server.
I have some record from Hbase which I am posting to Solr, but after posting
some 1 Million of data records, it suddenly stopped. Checking the Catalina
log trace it showed,
*org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: U
I got it resolved, actually the error trace was even more above this one.
It was just that the posting XML was not forming properly for the Solr
field *Date* which usually takes the format
*2006-07-15T22:18:48Z*
*
*
This is the standard format for the Solr date(datatype) which follows
specifically
Since there are no parentheses, the terms and operators are all at the save
level and the "OR" is essentially a redundant operator and ignored, so:
q=name:memory OR -name:encoded
is treated as:
q=name:memory -name:encoded
When what you probably want is:
q=name:memory OR (-name:encoded)
BUT.
Hi,
We just configured a new Solr cloud (5 nodes) running Solr 4.3, ran about 200
000 queries taken from our production environment and measured the performance
of the cloud over a collection of 14M documents with the default Solr settings.
We are now trying to tune the different caches and whe
Been working on it for quitre some time.
this is my config
Now, this runs in my test env and the only thing I do is change the
configuration to another db( and as a result also the schema name from
[dbo] to another )
This result in a totally different behavior.
In the first confi
Not that I know of. Grouping pretty much treats all groups the same...
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Gunnar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to page results with grouping /field collapsing. My query is:
>
> ?q=myKeywords&start=0&rows=100&group=true&group.field=myGroupField&group.form
Probably not the root of your problem, but
bq: and committing it there after.
Does that mean you're calling commit after every
document? This is usually poor practice, I'd set
the autocommit intervals on solrconfig.xml and NOT
call commit explicitly.
Does the same document fail every time? What
The biggest thing is that the spellchecker has lots of knobs
to tune, all the stuff in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate
TermsComponent, on the other hand, just gives you
what's in the index with essentially no knobs to tune.
So it depends on your goal. Typeahead
Hello Dmitry,
it's Windows 7. I'm starting Jetty with java -jar start.jar
31.07.2013 12:36, Dmitry Kan пишет:
Artem,
Whats the OS are using?
So far jetty 9 with solr 4.3.1 works ok under ubuntu 12.04.
On 30 Jul 2013 17:23, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
Of course, I meant Jetty (not Tomcat)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Steven Bower wrote:
>
> not sure what you mean by good hit raitio?
>
I mean such queries are really expensive (even on cache hit), so if the
list of ids changes every time, it never hit cache and hence executes these
heavy queries every time. It's well known perf
I am running solr 4.0 in a cloud. We have close to 100Mdocuments. The data
is from a single DB table. I use dih.
Our solrCloud has 3 zookeepers, one tomcat, 2 solr instances in same
tomcat. We have 8 GB Ram.
After indexing 14M, my indexing fails witht the below exception.
solr org.apache.lucene.i
fwiw,
this code won't capture uncommitted duplicates.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Jack Krupansky
> wrote:
> > The Solr SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory is designed to facilitate
> dedupe...
> > any particular reason you did not use it
Do you mean you get different results with group=true?
numFound is supposed returns the number of ungrouped hits.
To get the number of groups, you are expected to set
set group.ngroups=true.
Even then, the result will only give you an upperbound
in a distributed environment.
To get the exact numbe
Hello everyone,
I have a question about Solr TrieField and Lucene FieldCache.
>From my understanding, Solr added the implementation of TrieField to
perform faster range queries.
For each value it will index multiple terms. The n-th term being a masked
version of our value,
showing only it first (
Can you try:
q=+name:memory -name:encoded
or
q=name:memory AND -name:encoded
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:14 AM, karanjindal <
karan_jin...@students.iiit.ac.in> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using solr 3.2 and confused how a particular query is executed.
> q=name:memory OR -name:encoded
> separately
Artem,
Whats the OS are using?
So far jetty 9 with solr 4.3.1 works ok under ubuntu 12.04.
On 30 Jul 2013 17:23, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
> Of course, I meant Jetty (not Tomcat). So apologies for spam and confusion
> of my own. The rest of the statement stands.
>
> Personal website: http:/
I’m using solr 4.0 with DIH jdbc connector. I have a field named *code* with
multiple values separated by semicolon(;). I am trying to list the search
results which matches the field query(fq) to be listed at the top and
remaining should be listed below. So this is not just a filter query to list
o
Hey there
Is there a way to show the total row count (documents that will be inserted)
when executing a full import through the Data Import Request handler ?
Currently after executing a full import and pointing to /dataimport
you can get the total rows processed
6354
It would be nice if you
Hi list,
I have a Solr server, which uses sharding to make distributed search
with another Solr server. The other Solr server now migrates to a Solr
Cloud system. I've been trying recently to continue searching the Solr
Cloud as a shard for my Solr server, but this is failing with mysterious
effec
Hi, I'm trying to create a field with multiple fields inside, that is:
origin: {
htmlUrl: "http://www.gazzetta.it/";,
streamId: "feed/http://www.gazzetta.it/rss/Home.xml";,
title: "Gazzetta.it"
},
Get something like this. Is that possible? I'm using Solr 4.4.0.
Thanks
smime.p7s
Description: S/M
Thank you very much, Alan. Now it's working! I agree with you: this kind of
things should be documented at least in CHANGELOG.txt, because when
upgrading from one version to another all should be compatible between
versions, but this is not the case, thus people should be noticed of that.
Regards,
Hello,
I'm trying to page results with grouping /field collapsing. My query is:
?q=myKeywords&start=0&rows=100&group=true&group.field=myGroupField&group.format=simple&group.limit=1
The result will contain 70 groups, is there a way to get 100 records
returned, means 70 from each group first doc
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
