OK thanks. So I guess I will set up my own "normal" webserver and have the solr
server a sort of private web-based API (or possibly a front-end that, when a
user clicks on a search result link, just redirects the user to my "normal" web
server that has the related file). That's easy enough. If t
That's a good idea, I'll try that next week.
Thanks!
Tim
On 29/06/13 12:39 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Tim:
Yeah, this doesn't make much sense to me either since,
as you say, you should be seeing some metrics upon
occasion. But do note that the underlying cache only gets
filled when getting doc
Solr HTTP caching also support "e-tags". These are unique keys for the
output of a query. If you send a query twice, and the index has not
changed, the return will be the same. The e-tag is generated from the
query string and the index generation number.
If Varnish supports e-tags, you can kee
I do not know what causes the error. This setup will not work. You need
one or three zookeepers. SolrCloud demands that a majority of the ZK
servers agree. If you have two ZKs this will not work.
On 06/29/2013 05:47 AM, Sagar Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi,
I setup 2 solr instances on 2 different mach
On a large website, by putting 1 varnish in front of all 4 SOLR boxes we
were able to trim 25% off the load time (TTFB) of the page.
Our hit ratio was between 55 and 75%. We gave varnish 24GB of RAM, and was
not able to fill it under full load with a 10 minute cache timeout.
We get about 2.4M SOL
OK.
Here is the answer for us. Here is a sample default.vcl. We are validating
the LastModified ( if (!beresp.http.last-modified) )
is changing when the core is indexed and the version changes of the index.
This does 10 minutes caching and a 1hr grace period (if solr is down, it
will deliver resu
Hello Utkarsh,
This may or may not be relevant for your use-case, but the way we deal with
this scenario is to retrieve the top N documents 5,10,20or100 at a time
(user selectable). We can then page the results, changing the start
parameter to return the next set. This allows us to 'retrieve' milli
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4978
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes we need to use getTimestamp instead of getDate. Please create an issue.
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> > So disabling convertType
Tim:
Yeah, this doesn't make much sense to me either since,
as you say, you should be seeing some metrics upon
occasion. But do note that the underlying cache only gets
filled when getting documents to return in query results,
since there's no autowarming going on it may come and
go.
But you can
There's nothing built into the indexing process that stores URLs allowing
you to fetch the document, you have to do that yourself. I'm not sure how
the link is getting into the search results, you're assigning "doc1" as the
ID of the doc, and I think the browse request handler, aka Solaritas is
con
Yes, we are softCommit'ing every 1000ms, but that should be enough time to see
metrics though, right? For example, I still get non-cumulative metrics from the
other caches (which are also throw away). I've also curl/sampled enough that I
probably should have seen a value by now.
If anyone else
Yes we need to use getTimestamp instead of getDate. Please create an issue.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> So disabling convertType does provide a workaround for my problem with
> datetime column. But the problem still exists when convertType is enabled
> because DIH is not d
So disabling convertType does provide a workaround for my problem with
datetime column. But the problem still exists when convertType is enabled
because DIH is not doing the conversion correctly for a solr date field.
Solr date field does have a time portion but java.sql.Date does not. So
DIH sh
Sorry, i thought it was obvious. The links that are broken are the links that
are returned in the search results. Using the example in the documentation I
mentioned below, to load a word doc via
curl
"http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.id=doc1&commit=true"; -F
"myfile=@my
Well, the code is all in the same JVM, so there's no
reason a singleton approach wouldn't work that I
can think of. All the multithreaded caveats apply.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Peyman Faratin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a multicore setup (in 4.3.0). Is it possible for one core to
Mike:
One issue is that you're forcing all the work onto the Solr
server, and single-threading to boot by using DIH. You can
consider moving to a SolrJ model where you can have
N clients sending data to Solr if you can partition the data
up amongst the N clients cleanly.
FWIW,
Erick
On Sat, Jun
Well, depending on how many docs get served
from the cache the time will vary. But this is
just ugly, if you can avoid this use-case it would
be a Good Thing.
Problem here is that each and every shard must
assemble the list of 2,000 documents (just ID and
sort criteria, usually score).
Then the n
It's especially weird that the hit ratio is so high and you're
not seeing anything in the cache. Are you perhaps soft
committing frequently? Soft commits throw away all the
top-level caches including documentCache I think
Erick
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> Than
What links? You haven't shown us what link you're clicking on
that generates the 404 error.
You might want to review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, MA LIG wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran the solr example as described in
> http://lucene.apa
Setting convertType=false does solve the datetime issue. But there are now
other columns that were working before but not working now. Since I have
already done some research into the datetime to date issue and not been
able to find a solution, I think I will have to keep convertType set to
false
Cores can be reloaded, they are inside solrcore loader /I forgot the exact
name/, and they will have different classloaders /that's servlet thing/, so
if you want singletons you must load them outside of the core, using a
parent classloader - in case of jetty, this means writing your own jetty
init
I just double check my config. We are using convertType=true. Someone
else came up with the config so I am not sure why we are using it. I will
try with it set to false to see if something else will break. Thanks for
pointing that out.
This is my first time using DIH. I really like what I hav
its the singleton pattern, where in my case i want an object (which is RAM
expensive) to be a centralized coordinator of application logic.
thank you
On Jun 29, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> There is very little shared between multiple cores (instanceDir paths,
> logging c
Use the edismax query parser with a higher boost for category than name:
qf=name category^10.0
Tune the boost as needed for your app.
Make sure name and category have both "text" and "string" variants - use
. The string variant is good for facets, the text variant is good
for keyword searc
Both dynamic fields and multivalued fields are powerful Solr features that
can be used to great effect, but only is used in moderation - a relatively
small number of discrete values (e.g., a few dozens of strings.) Anything
more complex and you are asking for trouble and creating a pseudo-schema
Hi,
I setup 2 solr instances on 2 different machines and configured 2 zookeeper
servers on these machines also. When I start solr on both machines and try to
access the solr web-admin then I get following error on browser -
"Http status 503 - server is shutting down"
When I setup a single stand
Hi Mike,
You could try http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
And make sure you commit at the very end.
From: Mike L.
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 3:15 AM
Subject: FileDataSource vs JdbcDataSouce (speed) Solr 3.5
I'
Hi,
Currently i've certain sample data :
name : summer boot
category : boot shoe
name : snow boot
category : boot shoe
name : boot pant
category : pants
name : modern boot pant
category : pants
name : modern bootcut
category : pants
If the keyword search "boot" , how to make the item with c
Good day,
I'm seeking some guidance on how best to represent the following data within
a solr schema.
I have a list of subjects which are detailed to n levels.
Each document can contain many of these subject entities.
As I see it if this had been just 1 subject per document, dynamic fields
would ha
29 matches
Mail list logo
