I just double check my config.  We are using convertType=true.  Someone
else came up with the config so I am not sure why we are using it.  I will
try with it set to false to see if something else will break.  Thanks for
pointing that out.

This is my first time using DIH.  I really like what I have seen so far.

Bill


On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The default in JdbcDataSource is to use ResultSet.getObject which
> returns the underlying database's type. The type specific methods in
> ResultSet are not invoked unless you are using convertType="true".
>
> Is MySQL actually returning java.sql.Timestamp objects?
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Bill Au <bill.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am running Solr 4.3.0, using DIH to import data from MySQL.  I am
> running
> > into a very strange problem where data from a datetime column being
> > imported with the right date but the time is 00:00:00.  I tried using SQL
> > DATE_FORMAT() and also DIH DateFormatTransformer but nothing works.  The
> > raw debug response of DIH, it looks like the time porting of the datetime
> > data is already 00:00:00 in Solr jdbc query result.
> >
> > So I looked at the source code of DIH JdbcDataSource class.  It is using
> > java.sql.ResultSet and its getDate() method to handle date column.  The
> > getDate() method returns java.sql.Date.  The java api doc for
> java.sql.Date
> >
> > http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/sql/Date.html
> >
> > states that:
> >
> > "To conform with the definition of SQL DATE, the millisecond values
> wrapped
> > by a java.sql.Date instance must be 'normalized' by setting the hours,
> > minutes, seconds, and milliseconds to zero in the particular time zone
> with
> > which the instance is associated."
> >
> > This seems to be describing exactly my problem.  Has anyone else notice
> > this problem?  Has anyone use DIH to index SQL datetime successfully?  If
> > so can you send me the relevant portion of the DIH config?
> >
> > Bill
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>

Reply via email to